Search Results for keywords:"Environmental Protection Agency"

Found 402 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Environmental Protection Agency"

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 9859
    Reading Time:about 12 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established new regulations for residues of the herbicide clopyralid on certain agricultural products, such as caneberries, bulb onions, and intermediate wheatgrass. These regulations are part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and are intended to ensure that residue levels are safe for human consumption. The EPA assessed the safety of clopyralid residues and found no significant risk to the general population, including infants and children. No international residue limits have been set for clopyralid, and this regulation directly impacts growers, food processors, and retailers but does not affect states, tribal governments, or impose unfunded mandates.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made some new rules to make sure a weed-killer called clopyralid is not too much in certain fruits and veggies, so it's safe to eat; these rules mainly tell farmers and food makers how much is okay.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11794
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Department of Justice has lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri regarding environmental claims at the Madison County Mines Superfund Site. The settlement involves Delta Asphalt, Inc., and aims to resolve contamination-related claims under federal and Missouri state environmental laws. Delta Asphalt will place controls on their property to allow the Environmental Protection Agency and the State to conduct necessary remedial actions. There is a public comment period, and individuals may submit comments and request a public meeting within 30 days of this notice.

    Simple Explanation

    The Justice Department has made a plan with a company called Delta Asphalt to help fix pollution problems at a place in Missouri. This plan wants Delta Asphalt to allow special helpers, like the EPA, to clean up the area.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 88
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a proposed consent decree related to a lawsuit where United Refining Co. claimed that the EPA did not act on its 2019 small refinery hardship exemption request under the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS) program. This proposed consent decree would require the EPA to make a decision on United's petition by February 19, 2021. Public comments on this proposal are encouraged and must be submitted by February 3, 2021. The proposed actions and comments can be viewed and submitted online through the official EPA website.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has a proposal where they promise to make a decision by February 19, 2021, on a special request from a company that asked for help because their refinery was too small to meet certain rules. People can tell the EPA what they think about this plan until February 3, 2021.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 16478
    Reading Time:about 67 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve West Virginia's plan to address visibility issues caused by air pollution in national parks and wilderness areas, known as Class I areas. This decision reverses a previous proposal to disapprove the state's plan. The approval is based on West Virginia's measures to control emissions and the conclusion that no further actions are needed to improve visibility during the specified period. The EPA's decision reflects a change in their policy, suggesting that if current air conditions are below a certain improvement mark, states are meeting progress requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA thinks that West Virginia's plan to make the air clearer around special nature areas is good, even though they first said it wasn't. They changed their mind because they believe the air is getting better, so the plan can stay as it is.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11998
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an information collection request about the modification of secondary treatment requirements for discharges into marine waters to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This request involves public comments that had previously been called for in August 2020, with an additional 30 days now open for further comments. The Clean Water Act section 301(h) allows specific wastewater treatment facilities to receive permits waiving some treatment requirements if they meet strict environmental criteria. The information collected will help ensure these facilities are operating within legal limits to protect water quality and habitats.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure that the way some water gets cleaned before going into the ocean is good for the environment, and they're asking people to say what they think about it. They have to get permission to ask these questions, and they're checking with people again to make sure everyone is okay with it.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 102847
    Reading Time:about 20 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Oklahoma's plan to control emissions from municipal solid waste landfills, as mandated by the Clean Air Act. This state plan aims to regulate existing landfills' pollutants in line with federal guidelines, making the plan federally enforceable if approved. The EPA evaluated the plan, confirming it meets federal requirements, and it will affect certain areas, including specific parts of Indian country in Oklahoma. The public can submit comments on this proposal until February 18, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to give a thumbs up to Oklahoma's plan to make sure trash dumps pollute less. They're checking the plan to make sure it follows the rules and people can tell the EPA what they think until February 18, 2025.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 9041
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve parts of a plan from Texas that ensures areas not meeting federal ozone standards are properly managing new pollution sources and emissions reporting. These areas include Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, and Bexar County. The plan submission meets the requirements under the Clean Air Act for managing new sources of pollution and ensuring detailed emissions reports are provided annually. Public comments on this proposal are invited until March 15, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure Texas is following rules to keep the air clean in big cities like Dallas and Houston. They're checking that Texas has a good plan to control smoke from new factories and reports how much pollution is in the air every year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10914
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has sent a request to extend data collection for the NESHAP regulations on nutritional yeast manufacturing to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This request has already been approved until February 28, 2025, but the EPA is asking for additional comments from the public by March 31, 2025. These regulations aim to control the emission of harmful air pollutants from yeast manufacturing facilities. The requirements include initial notifications, performance tests, and regular reports to ensure compliance.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to keep checking how four factories that make a special kind of yeast are doing so they don’t pollute the air too much. They’re asking people to say what they think about it before the end of March next year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 14139
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to submit a request for collecting information on its WaterSense® Program to the Office of Management and Budget. This program aims to promote water-efficient products with a common label. The EPA is inviting public comments for 60 days about the information collection process, which will help evaluate the program and gather data on product performance and consumer satisfaction. The estimated burden for respondents, including manufacturers and retailers, amounts to 8,710 hours annually, costing around $989,335 each year.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep checking how well a water-saving plan called WaterSense works and wants people to share their thoughts about it. They need help understanding some things because they're asking for more time and money than before and haven't explained everything clearly yet.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1040
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a correction to a previously published rule regarding the classification of major and area sources of air pollution under the Clean Air Act. This correction fixes a typographical error in the regulatory text, changing an incorrect reference to a specific regulation with the correct reference. The correction ensures clarity and consistency in the rule without changing its original intent or imposing new requirements. The rule is effective immediately to prevent confusion, as the public had already been informed of the content through earlier notices.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA fixed a mistake in its rules about air pollution that was like spelling a word wrong, and they wanted to make sure everyone knows about the change right away so there’s no confusion.