Search Results for keywords:"India"

Found 54 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"India"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 99281
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) decided that getting rid of antidumping duty orders on silicomanganese from India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela would likely cause harm to a U.S. industry. The ITC began these reviews on May 1, 2024, and chose to do expedited reviews in August 2024. They completed these determinations by December 4, 2024, concluding that the antidumping orders should stay in place to protect U.S. industry. This decision is documented in the ITC's publication titled Silicomanganese from India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-929-931 (Fourth Review).

    Simple Explanation

    Imagine a big club that helps make sure everyone plays fair with trades of a special metal called silicomanganese. They looked at whether stopping some special rules that protect local makers of this metal from unfair competition would be a bad idea. After thinking hard about it, they decided to keep these rules, which means they want to keep the local makers safe and happy.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7564
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission determined that the U.S. industry is suffering due to imports of fluid end blocks from China, Germany, India, and Italy. These imports were found to be subsidized by their respective governments, and some from Germany and Italy were sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The investigations began after petitions from several U.S. companies and a trade coalition, following which the Commission held a hearing in December 2020. Their final determinations were issued on January 25, 2021, confirming these findings.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. found that some countries, like China, Germany, India, and Italy, were not playing fair because they helped pay for making special metal parts called fluid end blocks, and some parts from Germany and Italy were sold too cheaply in the U.S., which hurt businesses in America.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10067
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce is delaying the preliminary decisions regarding the investigations into imports of a chemical called hexamethylenetetramine from China, Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia. Originally due by March 10, 2025, these decisions will now be postponed until April 29, 2025. This postponement comes after a request from the petitioner, Bakelite LLC, to allow more time for a thorough review of the information related to the cases. The final determinations will be made 75 days after these new preliminary determinations, unless there is a further delay.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce is taking longer to decide about some special rules for buying a chemical from China, Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia because a company asked for more time to gather all the information. Now, instead of deciding in March 2025, they will decide in late April 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 2478
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has issued a notice regarding India's Digital Services Tax (DST). The USTR found that India's DST is unfair or discriminatory and negatively impacts U.S. businesses. This tax applies only to non-resident companies and is imposed on revenue instead of income, which is against international tax principles. Further actions will be considered under Section 301 of the Trade Act to address these issues.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. noticed that India's rule about taxing companies from outside India is unfair to American businesses, like making them pay even if they don't earn profit there, and they plan to figure out what to do next.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11623
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission announced that it is conducting expedited reviews to determine if removing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rods from China, India, Taiwan, and Thailand would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry. The Commission has decided to carry out these reviews quickly, as the domestic party response was deemed adequate while the foreign party response was not. Interested parties can submit written comments, but they must adhere to specific guidelines and deadlines. Due to the complexity of these reviews, the Commission may extend the review period by up to 90 days.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission wants to check quickly if stopping special taxes on steel rods from some countries would hurt American businesses, because not many people from outside the U.S. wanted to talk about it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8764
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Department of Commerce has completed its review of the countervailing duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India. They concluded that if the order were revoked, it would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of subsidies that are countervailable. This review resulted in maintaining the duty order, highlighting the need to prevent the resumption of unfair trade practices. The department emphasized that the pigments covered by this order are subject to specific classification under U.S. trade regulations.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Commerce checked some rules about special purple paint stuff from India and decided to keep the rules because stopping them might cause unfair help for businesses that isn't allowed.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11708
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the countervailing duty orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rods from India and China would likely result in ongoing subsidies and harm to the U.S. industry. Therefore, the Department of Commerce will continue these orders. This decision follows a review process that did not receive adequate responses from China, India, or any respondents, leading to an expedited review. Further details and analysis can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accessible online.

    Simple Explanation

    The Commerce Department in the United States decided to keep special taxes on certain steel rods from India and China because if they stop, the U.S. might get hurt due to unfair help those countries give to their businesses.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11512
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination that producers and exporters of hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from India are receiving subsidies that can be countervailed. This investigation covers the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024, with parties invited to comment on the findings. The investigation aligns the final decision on countervailing duties with a separate investigation into whether hexamine is sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S., expected by July 14, 2025. The Department determined a preliminary subsidy rate for the main Indian producer, Kanoria Chemicals, which affects other non-examined companies as well.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government thinks that a special ingredient from India used in making things like medicine and fuels, called hexamine, is getting unfair help from its home country, making it cheaper and less fair for competitors in America; they are checking this out to see if they need to add extra taxes on it to make it fair for everyone.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 84
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to postpone the preliminary determinations in the countervailing duty investigations of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs imported from India and China. Originally scheduled for January 22, 2025, the determinations will now be made by March 28, 2025. This delay was requested by the petitioners to allow more time to review questionnaire responses and accurately assess subsidy rates. Commerce found no reason to deny this request, citing compliance with regulatory requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government is taking more time to decide if special taxes should be added to certain parts made in India and China that help big doors open and close. They need more time because some people asked to check everything carefully before making any decisions.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 5132
    Reading Time:about 13 minutes

    The Department of Commerce is reviewing an antidumping duty order on certain lined paper products from India for the period from September 2018 to August 2019. They found that the companies Navneet Education Ltd. and Super Impex did not sell the products below normal value during this time. The review determined that some companies listed had no shipments during the period, and others would follow the zero-duty rate calculated for Navneet and Super Impex. Commerce invites comments on these preliminary findings and will disclose calculations to parties involved.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Commerce checked if two companies from India sold notebook paper at unfair prices. They found that these companies followed the rules and didn't sell the paper too cheaply this time. They want people to share their thoughts about this finding.