FR 2025-02816

Overview

Title

Accessibility of User Interfaces, and Video Programming Guides and Menus

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FCC says that by August 2026, companies that make video gadgets need to make it easy for people who can't hear well to turn on captions, like subtitles they can read on the screen.

Summary AI

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced the compliance date for a rule requiring manufacturers of certain video devices and services to make closed captioning settings accessible for those who are deaf or hard of hearing. The compliance date for this requirement is set for August 17, 2026. This rule aligns with the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, ensuring that video programming with captions is fully accessible, especially for devices with next-generation operating systems. The rule change was confirmed after the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the related information collection requirements.

Abstract

In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) announces that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved, for a period of three years, an information collection associated with implementing the requirement that manufacturers of covered apparatus and multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) make closed captioning display settings readily accessible to individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, adopted by the Commission on July 18, 2024, in the Accessibility of User Interfaces, and Video Programming Guides and Menus Third Report and Order (Order). This document is consistent with the Order, which stated that the Commission would publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the compliance date of the "readily accessible" rule and revise the rule accordingly.

Type: Rule
Citation: 90 FR 10041
Document #: 2025-02816
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 10041-10042

AnalysisAI

The document under discussion is an announcement from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding a new compliance requirement for manufacturers and distributors of certain video devices. It mandates that closed captioning settings must be easily accessible to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. The compliance date for this rule is set for August 17, 2026. This regulation aligns with the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, which seeks to improve accessibility for individuals with disabilities.


Summary of the Document

The document reflects a federal rule that impacts manufacturers of video devices and multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs). The rule focuses on ensuring that closed captioning options are readily accessible, enhancing the viewing experience for those who are deaf or hard of hearing. The compliance period allows stakeholders sufficient time to align their products and services with the new requirements, particularly for devices implementing next-generation operating systems post-August 17, 2026.

The document also details procedural aspects, such as the Office of Management and Budget's approval of information collection requirements and the associated reporting burden. The OMB has set an annual financial burden of $95,700 and a time burden of 11,465 hours for compliance.


Issues and Concerns

The document presents several issues:

  • Complexity and Technical Language: The document is filled with technical jargon and references to specific Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections. This complexity may pose challenges for individuals or small businesses trying to comply without expert legal or technical assistance.

  • Calculation of Costs and Burdens: The document does not clearly explain how the substantial annual cost and time burden were derived, making it difficult for stakeholders to assess the efficiency or justification behind these figures.

  • Impact on Small Businesses and Individuals: There is a lack of discussion on how the regulation might disproportionately affect small businesses or specific individuals, potentially leading to unintended hardships.

  • Incorporation of Beneficiary Feedback: The document does not articulate how feedback from the intended beneficiaries—deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals—has been or will be incorporated into evaluating the effectiveness and impact of these regulations.


Impact on the Public Broadly

Broadly, this regulation aims to improve accessibility, a crucial goal that can lead to a more inclusive media environment. While this is a beneficial development for individuals with disabilities, the broader public may experience increased costs for goods and services if manufacturers need to invest significantly to meet compliance requirements.


Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impact:

  • Individuals with Disabilities: The rule undeniably benefits the deaf and hard-of-hearing community by making it easier to access and navigate closed captioning settings on various devices.

  • Advocacy Groups: These groups may see this regulation as a significant step forward in advancing rights and accessibility for people with disabilities.

Negative Impact:

  • Small Businesses and Device Manufacturers: The potential financial and logistical challenges of meeting these new requirements could place a significant burden on small businesses within the technology and media sectors. They might face additional costs related to compliance, reporting, and modifying existing or future products.

  • Consumers: While the end goal enhances accessibility for some, consumers may bear the burden of increased costs passed down from manufacturers and distributors adapting to meet these new requirements.

The rule underscores a pivotal shift toward greater accessibility, but it also requires consideration of economic impacts and clear communication to ensure successful implementation and compliance.

Financial Assessment

In the Federal Register document concerning the accessibility of user interfaces and video programming guides and menus, financial allocations are mentioned primarily in relation to the implementation and compliance efforts required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The total annual cost identified in the document is $95,700. This cost is associated with the requirements set forth by the regulations that aim to ensure accessibility of closed captioning for individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Financial Summary

The document specifies several key financial elements:

  • Total Annual Cost: The document highlights that there is an anticipated expenditure of $95,700 annually. This expenditure covers the various costs associated with complying with the new regulations related to closed captioning display settings.

  • Total Annual Burden: Accompanying the costs, there is an indication of a total annual burden of 11,465 hours. This figure likely reflects the combined effort in hours required by respondents to adhere to the compliance guidelines and administrative mandates outlined by the FCC.

Relation to Identified Issues

Several issues are identified regarding the financial elements and their implications:

  1. Lack of Clarity on Cost Breakdown: The document does not detail how the $95,700 annual cost or the 11,465 hours are calculated. A lack of transparency in these figures may hinder the ability of stakeholders, especially smaller entities, to assess the efficiency and necessity of these costs. Questions may arise regarding whether these expenditures are justified, particularly among small businesses or individual respondents who are required to comply with these regulations.

  2. Impact on Small Businesses: Without an analysis of the financial impact on small businesses or individuals, there is an unknown factor as to how smaller entities might be disproportionately affected by the compliance costs. This omission is significant, as these businesses may struggle more with allocation of limited resources to meet regulatory requirements.

  3. Engagement with Stakeholders: The document does not discuss how insights or feedback from disabled individuals, the primary beneficiaries of these regulations, have influenced the financial estimates or the potential effectiveness of the regulations. Engaging with these groups could provide crucial insights into whether the expenses indeed align with enhancing accessibility effectively.

  4. Specific Needs and Uses: More clarity could be offered regarding which specific needs and uses the $95,700 is meant to cover. By not delineating what components of compliance this expense includes—such as whether it covers technology updates, personnel training, or administrative adjustments—it is challenging for stakeholders to understand the direct benefit derived from this financial outlay.

In summary, while the document specifies a clear annual cost and a corresponding effort in hours, it lacks the necessary breakdown and impact analysis that could inform affected entities more comprehensively about the nature of these financial commitments. Providing this information could facilitate a better understanding and potentially encourage more efficient compliance with the regulatory requirements.

Issues

  • • The document is quite technical and may be difficult for a layperson to understand, especially regarding compliance details and the technical requirements for closed captioning.

  • • Some of the language and jargon used in the document, such as references to specific sections of the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), might be complex for individuals or small entities trying to comply with these regulations without legal or technical assistance.

  • • The document does not provide a clear explanation of how the annual cost of $95,700 or the total annual burden of 11,465 hours were calculated, making it difficult to assess whether this expenditure is justified or efficient.

  • • There is no discussion or evaluation of the potential impact on small businesses or individuals that might be disproportionately affected by the regulation requirements.

  • • The document does not appear to address how feedback from disabled individuals, who are the intended beneficiaries of the rule, was or will be incorporated into assessing the effectiveness of these regulations.

  • • There could be more clarity on what specific needs and uses the $95,700 annual cost and 11,465 hours cover, as well as how they will enhance accessibility effectively.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,368
Sentences: 44
Entities: 143

Language

Nouns: 440
Verbs: 102
Adjectives: 41
Adverbs: 14
Numbers: 121

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.91
Average Sentence Length:
31.09
Token Entropy:
5.42
Readability (ARI):
20.54

Reading Time

about 5 minutes