FR 2024-29399

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice regarding an application submitted by PE Hydro Generation, LLC. The application seeks a temporary change to water flow regulations at the Millville Hydroelectric Project, located on the Shenandoah River in Jefferson County, West Virginia. This modification is intended to facilitate a dam safety inspection by slightly lowering the water level for less than a day, while ensuring that a minimum flow of 200 cubic feet per second is maintained downstream.

Summary of the Document

The notice invites public inspection and participation by providing details on how individuals can submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene. The deadline for these submissions is set for January 8, 2025. FERC strongly encourages electronic submissions and has provided detailed instructions and contact information to assist individuals through the process.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several points within the notice that raise potential concerns:

1. Purpose of the Variance: While it is stated that the change in flow is required for a dam safety inspection, the document does not elaborate on why this variance is indispensable, nor are any specific details given about the inspection itself.

2. Environmental Impact: The notice fails to describe how the reduction in bypassed reach flow could impact the surrounding ecosystem or the local community. This omission could be pivotal for stakeholders concerned about environmental conservation and local water use.

3. Lack of Point of Contact: Although FERC contact details for procedural assistance are provided, there is no specified point of contact for parties interested in addressing potential environmental impacts.

4. Alternative Considerations: The notice does not mention any alternative methods considered to minimize negative impacts during the variance, nor does it explain measures that will be implemented to mitigate such impacts.

5. Historical Context: There is no reference to whether similar variances have been requested or granted previously, which might offer reassurance or insight into the potential impacts of this variance.

6. Decision-Making Process: The document briefly outlines the process for public comments but does not detail how these submissions will influence the decision on whether the variance will be granted.

Public Implications

The public might view this notice with a level of concern, particularly those residing near the project site, as there is potential for environmental or resource management impacts. The limited detail about potential effects or the justification for the variance could cause hesitation among community members and local stakeholders.

Stakeholder Impacts

The hydroelectric project operators might benefit positively from the variance if it facilitates necessary maintenance work that ensures long-term safety and operational efficiency. However, environmental advocacy groups, local residents, and downstream water users may have concerns about any ecological disruption or water availability issues, albeit for a short duration.

In conclusion, while the notice aims to inform and engage the public in regulatory processes, it might fall short in providing the depth of information needed for stakeholders to fully understand and assess the impacts of the proposed variance. All who may be affected are encouraged to participate actively by submitting comments or petitions by the stated deadline.