Overview
Title
Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards
Agencies
ELI5 AI
HUD is using new maps to decide where and how to help people with housing. This helps them make sure they are helping the right places with their programs based on community needs.
Summary AI
In this final rule, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) adopts the 2020 Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) standards for use in its programs. This update ensures that HUD's data and program administration remain accurate and current based on new delineations provided by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The rule affects various HUD programs, including housing grants and rental calculations, ensuring resources are properly directed to where they are most needed. The rule received positive feedback from the public, with some additional suggestions for minimizing disruptions in program implementation.
Abstract
This rule adopts the 2020 Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) standards as determined by the Office of Management and Budget's July 16, 2021, Federal Register notice for all HUD use of CBSAs. HUD uses CBSAs throughout its programs and is updating the standards to ensure accuracy of data and program administration.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
In a recent rule issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), significant changes have been implemented by adopting the 2020 Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) standards. Prescribed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), these standards will guide the geographical delineations used across a breadth of HUD programs. This update is intended to ensure that HUD's administrative practices reflect the latest data and accurately address current housing and community development needs. By doing so, HUD aims to ensure that resources are properly allocated to where they are most required.
General Overview
The rule, effective from January 6, 2025, updates CBSA standards as established in a Federal Register notice from July 2021. The adoption of these standards is meant to enhance the precision of several HUD program components—namely, the calculation of fair market rents, area median family income, and income limits. CBSAs are intended to capture regions with significant commuting ties that tie a central urban area to surrounding communities. This rule aligns HUD's practices with these updated statistical delineations to reflect the latest census data and adjustments made for shifting populations.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues were highlighted during the public comment phase that exposed potential challenges with the new rule. Notably, some commentators expressed concern over potential disruptions in program participation due to changes in income limits derived from the new geographic delineations. They suggested a "hold harmless" policy to stabilize these limits and safeguard participants against abrupt declines. HUD's response acknowledged the issue but refrained from committing to specific policy adjustments in the final rule.
Other comments suggested a move towards using ZIP codes as a more granular alternative to the county-based CBSA delineations. Proponents argued that ZIP codes could better capture changing population patterns and commuting behaviors. However, HUD maintained that it must adhere to the county-based standards set by the OMB without delving into the feasibility or considerations around such alternatives.
Public Impact
For the general populace, the adoption of the updated CBSA standards seeks to deliver a more equitable distribution of resources. By aligning program calculations with the latest population and geographic data, HUD aims to ensure that housing assistance, grant allocations, and other resources are targeted more effectively. This should benefit communities receiving these services by more accurately reflecting their current socioeconomic status and housing needs.
Impact on Stakeholders
Housing agencies and program participants could experience both positive and negative effects from the rule's implementation. On the positive side, the updated standards could lead to more accurate assessments of housing market conditions, thus potentially directing more robust assistance to areas most in need. Conversely, stakeholders have expressed apprehensions over how geographic changes might lower income thresholds or alter eligibility criteria, which could inadvertently exclude some beneficiaries.
Furthermore, real estate professionals and community development organizations stand to benefit from a refreshed and precise set of standards, ensuring that the areas they serve receive suitable consideration in federal housing programs. However, these stakeholders may need to brace for the initial administrative and logistical challenges posed by the transition to these new standards.
Conclusion
Overall, the rule signifies a substantial update in the methodology governing HUD's resource allocation across its various programs. While it primarily aims to refine and modernize statistical and administrative practices, it will be crucial for HUD to monitor the rule's impact to address any unforeseen challenges brought on by the new CBSA standards. Balancing precision and public interest will remain a key challenge as HUD moves forward with this implementation.
Issues
• The document contains complex language and terminology which might be difficult for individuals who are not familiar with HUD's policies and programs to understand.
• There is a suggestion from a public comment regarding a 'hold harmless' policy to prevent income limits from declining due to geographic changes. While HUD responded to this comment, the response could be seen as lacking in detail about how such feedback might be considered in the future.
• The rule adopts county-based CBSAs as determined by OMB but does not address why alternative geographic measurements, like ZIP codes suggested by a commenter, might not be feasible solutions, considering they could provide more detailed data.
• The comments and responses section discusses potential impacts on program participants, but there is no detailed analysis within the rule regarding the perceived disruptions due to new delineations and how HUD plans to mitigate these issues.
• Although the rule mentions the use of CBSA standards in various HUD programs, it does not provide detailed examples or case studies on the potential financial implications or savings realized by adopting the new CBSA standards.
• The rule states it will assist in accurate calculation of Fair Market Rents, Area Median Family Income, and Income Limits, but lacks detailed projections or models on how the changes might impact housing assistance allocations across different metropolitan areas.