FR 2021-02429

Overview

Title

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

Agencies

ELI5 AI

FEMA has made changes to maps that show which areas are likely to flood. These changes help decide how much people need to pay for flood insurance on new houses to keep them safe if it rains too much.

Summary AI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has finalized new or modified flood hazard determinations for various communities. These updates, shown in Letters of Map Revision (LOMR), affect the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and, in some cases, the Flood Insurance Study reports. These changes are used to determine flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents. The adjustments have been made to comply with floodplain management measures required by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

Abstract

New or modified Base (1-percent annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on the indicated Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities listed in the table below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports, currently in effect for the listed communities. The flood hazard determinations modified by each LOMR will be used to calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 8376
Document #: 2021-02429
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 8376-8379

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document is a notice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the Department of Homeland Security. It announces finalized updates to flood hazard determinations, which are presented in the form of Letters of Map Revision (LOMR). These revisions modify the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and, in some cases, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for various communities. Essentially, these revisions will affect how flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents are calculated, aligning with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues with the document is the use of technical language without adequate explanation. Terms like "Base Flood Elevations (BFEs)" and "Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)" are used without definitions, which could confuse a lay audience unfamiliar with flood management terminology. This limits the accessibility of the document.

The document also lacks transparency regarding the process by which these determinations are made, as well as how communities can appeal these decisions. While it mentions legal statutes such as the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, it does not provide explanations or summaries of these legal frameworks, leaving readers without a contextual understanding of the legal basis for the changes.

Additionally, the document fails to clarify how these adjustments will influence the affordability of flood insurance, which could be a critical concern for property owners. The absence of information on measures taken to ensure data accuracy and reliability further detracts from the document’s usefulness.

Impact on the Public

The updates to flood hazard determinations could have broad implications for the public. Communities affected by these changes may see shifts in their designated flood zones, potentially impacting property values, insurance requirements, and building regulations. New or existing property owners may need to reassess their flood risk and insurance coverage, which could influence both financial planning and property investment decisions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For local governments and community planners, these updates necessitate revisions to floodplain management strategies. They are required to align with NFIP guidelines to remain eligible for participation in the program. Although the document emphasizes minimum criteria, it allows communities to adopt stricter measures, providing an opportunity for enhanced flood protection that may benefit residents.

Property owners and real estate developers are stakeholders significantly impacted by these changes. The revised flood hazard information could alter insurance premiums, affecting not only operating costs but also the attractiveness of certain areas for investment and development.

Overall, while the document serves an essential function in updating flood-related policies, it could be improved through clearer language, the inclusion of explanations or summaries of relevant statutes, and more detailed insights into the potential economic implications of the changes introduced.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical jargon such as 'Base Flood Elevations (BFEs)' and 'Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)' without providing definitions or explanations for a lay audience.

  • • Although the document lists resources for further information, it does not explain the process by which the flood hazard determinations are made or how communities can appeal them if necessary.

  • • The notice mentions that the changes are 'used to calculate flood insurance premium rates.' It does not provide any information on how these changes might impact the affordability of flood insurance for new or existing property owners.

  • • The document references legal statutes (e.g., 'section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973' and 'National Flood Insurance Act of 1968') without providing summaries of these laws for context.

  • • The document does not mention any specific measures taken to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the LOMR data.

  • • While the document encourages owners and lessees to review the updated maps, it does not explain how these individuals can use this information practically or how it might impact their properties.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 713
Sentences: 23
Entities: 58

Language

Nouns: 264
Verbs: 45
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.13
Average Sentence Length:
31.00
Token Entropy:
5.12
Readability (ARI):
21.85

Reading Time

about 2 minutes