FR 2021-01967

The document issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) details a notice related to the Upper Peninsula Power Company's hydroelectric project on the Dead River in Michigan. This notice pertains to the company's request for a temporary amendment to specific requirements in their license. The request aims to adjust the water levels of reservoirs managed under the hydroelectric project.

General Summary

The Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPC) has sought approval from FERC to temporarily change the water level targets at its hydroelectric project on the Dead River. Specifically, the company wishes to modify the start-of-month water level targets at the Silver Lake and Dead River Storage Basins for the year 2021. These changes are intended to investigate potential improvements to water quality, although the document does not provide detailed justifications on how water quality will be affected. Interested parties are given 30 days from the notice date to file comments, motions to intervene, or protests regarding this proposed variance.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One primary concern is the lack of detailed rationale for how the proposed changes to reservoir levels will result in improved water quality. Stakeholders might question the necessity and effectiveness of these alterations without empirical evidence or data supporting the claim. Furthermore, the technical language, notably the use of terms like "feet NGVD" (National Geodetic Vertical Datum), could confuse individuals unfamiliar with such terminology.

Additionally, the process for filing comments or motions to become involved in the decision-making process may seem daunting to those not versed in regulatory procedures. The comprehensive guidelines and specific requirements might deter public participation, especially when navigating challenges like typing lengthy URLs and understanding procedural jargon.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the public residing near and utilizing resources from the Dead River area might be directly affected by changes in water management. If the proposed changes succeed in enhancing water quality, residents could benefit from healthier ecosystems and improved recreational opportunities. However, without a clear demonstration of anticipated benefits, concerns may arise regarding possible negative impacts, such as alterations in the natural landscape or changes to local water usage regulations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as environmental groups, the proposed variance presents both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, these modifications could lead to positive environmental outcomes, aligning with sustainability goals. On the other hand, the potential lack of transparency and unclear outcomes from the proposed changes might be a cause for skepticism and further inquiry.

For the Upper Peninsula Power Company, obtaining this variance could represent a proactive step towards more adaptive and responsive resource management. However, it also places the company under public scrutiny, emphasizing the need for rigorous monitoring and transparent communication to validate their proposals and their resultant environmental impact.

The document outlines a regulatory process that may appear convoluted to some, yet remains crucial to ensure balanced stakeholder involvement and comprehensive environmental management. Such regulatory proceedings are essential to ensure that proposed changes serve the public interest and maintain ecological integrity.