Search Results for keywords:"trade policy"

Found 14 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"trade policy"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8765
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Department of Commerce conducted a second sunset review and found that if the countervailing duty order on steel grating from China were revoked, it would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of subsidies. This decision means that the protections against unfair subsidies will remain in place. The review included input from domestic manufacturers represented by the Metal Grating Coalition, but no significant responses from other interested parties. The final results were published, affirming the continuation of these duties to prevent unfair trade practices.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Commerce decided that if the special rules stopping unfair help to Chinese steel makers were canceled, it would be bad, so they are keeping the rules to help make sure trading stays fair.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11743
    Reading Time:about 17 minutes

    To address the flow of illicit drugs across the U.S.-Canada border, the U.S. has imposed additional tariffs on Canadian imports as outlined in a series of executive orders. This notice by the Department of Homeland Security adjusts the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. to implement these tariffs, effective March 7, 2025. The changes include a 10% tariff on certain Canadian products not qualifying for duty-free status under the USMCA, and specialized tariff adjustments for automotive and potash products to minimize economic disruption. The tariffs aim to pressure Canada to enhance measures against drug trafficking while maintaining trade considerations for vital sectors like the automotive industry.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. made a rule to make some things from Canada more expensive because they want Canada to help stop illegal drugs from coming in. This means extra costs on certain Canadian items, like cars and fertilizer, starting March 7, 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 96945
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided that getting rid of the existing countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel racks from China might lead to the return of government subsidies that help Chinese manufacturers at unfair levels. This conclusion comes after an expedited review, due to a lack of participation from Chinese respondents. The review examines whether subsidies would likely continue if the duty order were revoked, and it found that such subsidies would likely recur. The findings and related discussions are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is available for public access online.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government says if they stop charging extra money when people buy steel shelves from China, it might make things unfair because China's government might help their factories too much.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7411
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has announced an expedited review regarding the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from China. This review is conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess the likely effects of revoking the duty order, specifically whether it might cause harm to the U.S. industry. Interested parties have until January 29, 2021, to submit comments, although these comments cannot introduce new factual information. This complex review may be extended by up to 90 days as allowed under the Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The International Trade Commission is checking if stopping a special tax on crepe paper from China would hurt American businesses. They're looking at this quickly and want to hear what people think, but only until January 29, and they can't say anything new.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10677
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is seeking public comments on unfair trade practices by other countries. This initiative follows directives set out in the America First Trade Policy Presidential Memorandum and the Presidential Memorandum on Reciprocal Trade and Tariffs. Comments should specifically address non-reciprocal trade arrangements and the harm they cause to the U.S. The deadline for submitting comments is March 11, 2025, and submissions should explain the impact of these practices on U.S. interests, supported by quantified harm like opportunity costs.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Trade Office wants people to tell them if other countries are being unfair with trade, like if a country doesn't let the U.S. sell as much stuff to them as they sell to the U.S. They want to know by March 11, 2025, about any problems this causes, like losing money or chances to sell things.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11995
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The International Trade Commission is conducting a full review to determine if removing the antidumping duty on certain large diameter line pipes from Japan would lead to continued harm to the U.S. industry. They have decided to extend this review by up to 90 days, as allowed under their authority. People interested in participating as parties to the review must submit an entry of appearance 45 days after this notice's publication. The Commission will hold a hearing on September 11, 2025, and people can submit written comments on the review by specific deadlines noted in the notice.

    Simple Explanation

    The International Trade Commission is checking if stopping a special fee on big pipes from Japan might hurt American businesses. They are taking more time to make sure they get it right, and people can join in to share what they think.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 3175
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The Commerce Department's International Trade Administration is starting a countervailing duty investigation on sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China, following a petition filed by a U.S. producer, Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. The petition claims that these products benefit from unfair subsidies provided by the Chinese government and harm the U.S. industry by increasing imports, reducing market share, and depressing prices. The investigation will check whether the subsidies are causing material injury or threatening to cause injury. Interested parties can submit comments on the scope of the investigation and must follow specific filing requirements through the Commerce Department's electronic system.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government is checking if a type of rough material, used for grinding and sanding and brought in from China, is being sold unfairly cheap because of special help from the Chinese government. They're doing this because a company in the U.S. thinks this is hurting their business, and people can give their thoughts about this investigation.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 56
    Reading Time:about 11 minutes

    The Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration has proposed preliminary findings that Chinese manufacturers of certain chassis and subassemblies receive unfair subsidies, which can harm U.S. manufacturers. The investigation covers activities between January 1 and December 31, 2019. As a result of the findings, the U.S. government might impose extra duties on these imports to level the playing field. The public is invited to provide comments on this preliminary decision, and the final decision will require further verification due to travel restrictions related to COVID-19.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce found that China might be unfairly helping its companies make certain products cheaply, which could hurt companies in America. They are thinking about adding extra charges to these products from China and want people to share their thoughts on this idea.

  • Type:Presidential Document
    Citation:90 FR 11463
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The President issued Executive Order 14228, amending a previous order (Executive Order 14195) to increase tariffs on products from China from 10% to 20%. This decision was made because the Chinese government has not taken adequate steps to address the inflow of synthetic opioids, like fentanyl, which poses a threat to U.S. national security and economy. The order underscores that it is consistent with applicable law and does not confer any new rights enforceable at law.

    Simple Explanation

    The President decided to make Chinese goods more expensive by doubling the extra cost (tariffs) on them because China isn't doing enough to help stop bad drugs from coming into the U.S.

  • Type:Presidential Document
    Citation:90 FR 8471
    Reading Time:about 12 minutes

    The America First Trade Policy memorandum outlines a plan by the President to prioritize American economic and national security interests in trade policy. It directs various government officials to investigate and address issues like unfair trade practices, large trade deficits, and currency manipulation. The memo also emphasizes reviewing trade relations with China, exploring tariff adjustments, and examining the effectiveness of existing U.S. export controls. The goal is to enhance the United States' industrial and technological strengths, protect workers, and ensure fair trade practices with global partners.

    Simple Explanation

    The President wants to make trade fairer for America by checking if other countries are playing by the rules when buying and selling things. This plan, called the America First Trade Policy, also looks at how the U.S. can be stronger and smarter with its technology and factories.

123 Next