Search Results for keywords:"stilbenic optical brightening agents"

Found 2 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"stilbenic optical brightening agents"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10830
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) decided that if the antidumping duty orders on certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan were removed, it would likely harm the U.S. industry in the near future. These reviews were reinstated after a court ordered a reevaluation following a previous decision to revoke these orders. The USITC completed their review and published their findings in a document dated February 21, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The people who check if stuff sold from other countries to America is fair (USITC) said that taking away extra charges (called antidumping duties) on a type of product from China and Taiwan might hurt the people who make similar stuff in America. They looked at the issue again after being told by a court to reconsider their earlier decision.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11511
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping duty orders on certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan. This action is based on findings that lifting these duties could lead to the recurrence of dumping and harm to U.S. industries. The orders, which have been in place since 2012, will remain effective, ensuring that U.S. Customs continues to collect duty deposits on these imports. The next review of these orders is planned before the fifth anniversary of the ITC's last determination.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government has decided to keep a special rule that makes certain brightening chemicals from China and Taiwan more expensive, because taking away this rule might hurt American businesses that make or use the same chemicals.