Search Results for keywords:"investigation termination"

Found 12 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"investigation termination"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11062
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided not to review an initial decision to terminate an investigation into certain surface cleaning devices after a settlement was reached between the parties involved, which include SharkNinja Operating LLC and Dyson, Inc. This decision is based on the fact that the settlement aligns with public interest by saving resources and not adversely affecting the public. The investigation, initially launched in June 2024 over patent infringement allegations, is thus terminated following this settlement agreement, with no requests for review submitted. This resolution relies on the authority given under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission stopped looking into a fight between companies that make cleaning gadgets after they decided to be friends and settle their problem. This means they won't argue anymore, saving everyone's time and energy.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8033
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed a decision by an administrative law judge that found no violation of section 337 by several electronic device companies accused of patent infringement by Ericsson. After investigating, the Commission agreed with the judge's decision that there was no violation, mainly because the patent claims were either invalid or withdrawn. This means the investigation is now closed, and there was no wrongdoing found by the companies involved. The decision was finalized on January 16, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The Commission checked if some electronics companies broke rules about using inventions without permission. They found that the companies didn't break any rules, so they closed the investigation.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8033
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided to issue a General Exclusion Order (GEO). This order stops the unlicensed importation of certain foldable reusable drinking straws and accessories that infringe on specific claims of a U.S. patent. The investigation that led to this was initiated by The Final Co. LLC and involved several companies from China. The order means that any imports that break this patent cannot enter the U.S. without a license, and the investigation on this matter is now closed.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. decided that no one can bring special straws that copy someone else's idea into the country unless they have permission, and this means the investigation about these straws is now finished.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 2697
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission has ended its investigation into the impact of the Canada-EU Trade Agreement on the U.S. lobster industry. This decision follows a letter from the U.S. Trade Representative revoking the request for the investigation, as the European Union recently removed tariffs on imported lobsters, which eliminated the need for such a report. The investigation was originally requested in July 2020, but officially terminated on December 23, 2020. The Commission will not be releasing a report on this matter.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. decided not to check how a deal between Canada and Europe might hurt American lobster sellers because Europe stopped charging extra money to buy lobsters from anywhere, so now everyone can sell lobsters there more easily.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9630
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has ended its investigation into the effects of trade on U.S. workers and underserved communities. Originally requested by the U.S. Trade Representative in January 2023, this investigation was terminated after the request was withdrawn on February 4, 2025. Consequently, the Commission will not produce the previously planned report titled "Distributional Effects of Trade and Trade Policy on U.S. Workers, 2026 Report." This decision was made under the authority granted by the President and in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Simple Explanation

    The government decided not to continue looking into how buying and selling things with other countries affects workers and communities in the U.S. They were going to do a big study, but they changed their minds and stopped it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 5249
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission investigated a complaint from Heraeus Medical LLC and Heraeus Medical GmbH about misappropriation of trade secrets by companies including Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. The investigation looked into whether these actions violated section 337, which concerns trade practices injuring U.S. industries. Ultimately, the Commission concluded that there was no violation as Heraeus failed to prove the existence of a domestic industry impacted by these actions. Thus, the investigation was terminated without penalties against Zimmer Biomet.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission checked if some companies used secret ideas from another company without permission, but in the end, they decided that no rules were broken, so they stopped looking into it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11547
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed a case concerning NJOY, LLC's complaint against JUUL Labs, Inc. about certain vaporizer devices violating section 337. The Commission found no violation after evaluating the administrative law judge's initial findings. Although it reviewed some aspects like the non-infringement findings for a patent and economic issues, the decision not to find any violation was upheld, and the investigation was concluded.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission checked if a company broke any rules by using certain vaping devices but decided they didn't, and so they ended their investigation.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 106425
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to terminate the investigation into allegations that glass wine bottles imported from Chile were being sold at unfairly low prices in the United States. This decision comes after the U.S. Glass Producers Coalition withdrew its petition for antidumping duties. Although some parties opposed this withdrawal, Commerce deemed ending the investigation to be in the public interest. Consequently, U.S. Customs will stop suspending shipments of these bottles and will refund any deposits collected from importers due to the investigation.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge decided to stop checking if glass bottles from Chile were being sold too cheaply in the U.S. because the group that asked for the check changed their mind and took back their request. Now, stores will get their money back if they paid extra while waiting to see if the bottles were priced fairly.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 7157
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed an investigation regarding the importation and sale of certain photovoltaic connectors, which allegedly infringed on specific patent claims. Initially, there was a finding of a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act concerning the '153 patent. However, upon review, the Commission reversed this finding, determining that there was no violation due to the accused products not satisfying the necessary patent claims. The investigation has been concluded with no violation found.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission looked into special plugs for solar panels and at first thought they broke some rules, but then changed their mind and found they didn't. Now, everything is okay with those plugs.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 13624
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has concluded an investigation regarding the alleged patent infringement by Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (SDC) involving organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display panels. The investigation found no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, ruling that SDC did not demonstrate sufficient domestic industry ties required to support its claims, among other deficiencies. The investigation, which involved multiple parties and reviewed several patents, is now officially terminated with a finding of no violation.

    Simple Explanation

    The big people who make rules looked into whether a company named Samsung did something naughty with screens for phones. After checking it all out, they decided Samsung didn’t break any rules, so they’re closing the case.

123 Next