Search Results for keywords:"general exclusion order"

Found 3 results

Search Results: keywords:"general exclusion order"

💰 Only
Oldest Newest
  • 2021-00086 — Certain Shaker Screens for Drilling Fluids, Components Thereof, and Related Materials; Commission Determination To Review-nn-Part an Initial Determination Granting Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
    Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 1523
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided to partly review an initial decision that found certain companies violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing and selling infringing shaker screens used for drilling fluids. These products infringe specific patents and trademarks, leading M-I L.L.C. to request a general exclusion order and a 100% bond on these items during a U.S. Presidential review period. The Commission invites interested parties to submit their opinions regarding possible remedies, the public interest, and the amount of bonding required. Submissions are due on specific dates in January 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission is checking if some companies broke rules by bringing in and selling special screens used in drilling that might copy someone else's work. They want people to say what they think about making these companies stop selling them and paying a big penalty.

  • 2025-02086 — Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof (II); Notice of Institution of Investigation
    Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8811
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission announced that several companies have filed a complaint alleging violations of trademark laws concerning imported electrolyte beverages and their packaging that infringe on existing trademarks. The companies are asking for an investigation into these allegations, which may result in orders to stop these products from being imported or sold in the U.S. if violations are found. The investigation will look into whether the companies involved breached section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing these products and whether a U.S. industry is affected or being developed. Respondents have 20 days to respond to these allegations.

    Simple Explanation

    Some companies say that drinks with special labels are being brought into the U.S. without permission, so they asked a group to check if rules were broken. If they find problems, they might stop these drinks from coming in or being sold here.

  • 2025-04246 — Certain Passive Optical Network Equipment; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337
    Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 12366
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission is reviewing a decision related to an investigation into certain optical network equipment imported from China. The initial ruling found no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act, indicating that the involved patents weren't infringed upon and that the complainant, Optimum Communications, is no longer valid due to patent ownership changes. Despite recommendations for a general exclusion order if a violation was found, the evidence did not support such actions. After reviewing the case, the Commission has decided to examine the initial determination completely.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission is taking another look at a decision about some special network equipment from China, which was said not to break any rules. They're checking to make sure everything is okay with how they decided.