Search Results for keywords:"correction"

Found 39 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"correction"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10813
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The U.S. Department of Commerce issued a correction to a notice published on February 10, 2025, concerning countervailing duties on corrosion-resistant steel from Canada. The error involved the incorrect naming of a mandatory respondent in the original notice. The company name was mistakenly listed as ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc., but it should have been ArcelorMittal Dofasco G.P. This correction has been officially documented to ensure accurate information in the public record.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce needed to fix a mistake in a document about special taxes on certain steel from Canada. They got the name of a company wrong and corrected it to make sure everyone has the right information.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 13286
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The Federal Highway Administration within the Transportation Department has issued a rule to address a recent mistake in the Code of Federal Regulations. This correction involves removing the section titled "Sign Details" from Appendix C to Subpart A of Part 470 in Title 23 of the Code, as revised on April 1, 2024. This action was published to ensure the accuracy and clarity of the regulations.

    Simple Explanation

    The people who take care of roads made a little mistake in some rules about road signs, so they're fixing it by removing a part that shouldn't be there to keep everything clear and correct.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 2615
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    In a proposed rule document by the Environmental Protection Agency, there was a correction concerning pesticide petitions. The correction involved a date change in the document 2020-28117, initially published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2020. The DATES section on page 82998 mistakenly stated "January 20, 2021," which has been corrected to "January 21, 2021."

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a little fix to a document about pesticides; they changed a date from January 20, 2021, to January 21, 2021, to correct a mistake.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 7653
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The U.S. Copyright Office, part of the Library of Congress, has issued a correction to a final rule published on January 11, 2021. The rule pertains to the responsibilities of digital music providers in transferring and reporting royalties for unmatched musical works to a mechanical licensing collective. This action is related to the Music Modernization Act, which aims to address unlicensed use of musical works. The correction involves specific amendments to section 210.10 of the associated regulation.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Copyright Office made a small fix to some rules about how online music companies pay and report money for music they use but don't own, to make sure everything is clear and works right. This is part of a bigger plan to help musicians get paid fairly for their work.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 15447
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register correcting an error regarding the name of a company involved in an investigation. The company, originally listed as “Asha Spring and Engineering & Spring Company,” was corrected to “Asha Spring and Engineering Company.” This correction is part of the affirmative countervailing duty determination related to overhead door counterbalance torsion springs imported from India. The notice was issued in accordance with various sections of the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Simple Explanation

    Imagine a big book where grown-ups write down important rules about trading things like springs between countries. Someone wrote the name of a company incorrectly by accident, so they made a notice to fix it. Now, the book has the right name to make sure everyone knows who is involved.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10857
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), part of the Department of Transportation, issued a correction to a previous rule about highway-rail grade crossing safety standards. Initially, an error was made in the final rule published on December 14, 2020, where a reference was incorrectly linked to a non-existent paragraph. This correction fixes the mistake by correctly referring to the paragraph that lists the 10 states needing to submit updated reports electronically. This amendment is effective from February 23, 2021, and does not require public notice or comment due to the minor nature of the error.

    Simple Explanation

    The train safety people made a mistake in their book of rules and wrote down the wrong number. They've now fixed it so everybody knows which states need to send reports about keeping train crossings safe.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 5606
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    This document is a correction to a final regulation initially published in the Federal Register on December 11, 2024, under Treasury Decision 10016. These regulations pertain to how taxable income or loss and foreign currency gain or loss are determined for a qualified business unit. The document corrects specific portions of the published regulation and makes amendments to parts of the tax code under sections 861, 985 through 989, and 1502. These corrections are effective starting January 17, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    Imagine you have a special kind of piggy bank where you put money in different types of coins from all over the world. Sometimes the rules about how to count how much money is inside change a little bit. This document is about fixing a few mistakes in those rules so everything is clear and fair for counting those coins.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10227
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    In this proposed rule, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) aims to correct a past error regarding emission limits related to regional haze in the United States Virgin Islands. Originally published in 2012, the rule did not include certain required limits in the Code of Federal Regulations. This update will incorporate those limits without changing any previous decisions or reopening past determinations. The EPA is inviting public comments on this correction for transparency, focusing solely on confirming the specific limits intended to have been included.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a goof in a past rule about air pollution in the Virgin Islands by leaving out some important pollution limits they meant to include. Now, they're fixing the mistake and telling people exactly what limits should have been in there from the start.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 16466
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice's National Security Division issued a correction to a rule that limits certain data transactions with specific countries or individuals. Initially published on January 8, 2025, the rule contained an incorrect reference, which this document aims to fix. The correction involves changing a cross-reference in section 202.401 of the regulations to ensure accuracy. This amendment takes effect on April 18, 2025, and aims to support national security by accurately addressing access to sensitive data.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Justice found a mistake in a rule about who can look at or buy certain important information. They fixed the mistake by changing a number, so the rule works better to keep everyone's information safe.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10826
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a correction to a previous rule regarding Utah's State Implementation Plans (SIP) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Initially, the EPA mistakenly stated that no comments were received during the public comment period. However, it turned out they had overlooked one electronically submitted comment. The EPA clarified that they had temporarily stopped accepting mailed comments because of COVID-19, but they maintained the requirement to consider public feedback through electronic means. This rule is now effective as of February 23, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a mistake earlier and said no one commented on a new air quality rule for Utah when actually someone did comment online. Because of COVID-19, they weren't accepting comments by mail, just online. Now, they've corrected this and will take the online comment into account.

123 Next