Search Results for keywords:"compensatory mitigation"

Found 2 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"compensatory mitigation"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7107
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice has announced a proposed Consent Decree in the case of United States v. Roger J. LaPant, Jr., related to violations of the Clean Water Act. The decree involves the defendant being required to pay a civil penalty and perform compensatory mitigation for discharging pollutants into U.S. waters without a permit. Public comments on this proposal can be submitted within thirty days of the notice. The document can be viewed online or at the Clerk's Office of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, although physical access may be limited due to COVID-19.

    Simple Explanation

    The government says Roger J. LaPant, Jr. broke the rules by putting bad stuff in the water without asking first, and now he needs to pay money and fix the damage he caused. People can send their thoughts about what should happen within a month, and they can read more about it online or at a special office, but going there might be tricky because of the virus.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 3184
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has released the Record of Decision (ROD) for managing the Greater Sage-Grouse habitat in Wyoming. After extensive planning and environmental processes over the past decade, the BLM concluded that no new land use planning is required and decided not to amend existing land use plans. This decision aligns with the 2019 Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment and is not open to appeal or protest. The ROD also summarizes considerations on a range of issues, such as environmental impacts and compensatory mitigation strategies for the habitat.

    Simple Explanation

    The BLM has decided how they'll take care of a special bird called the Greater Sage-Grouse in Wyoming, and they think they don't need to change their old plans. They say people can't argue or change this decision anymore.