Search Results for keywords:"Section 337"

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has started an advisory opinion proceeding at the request of Nortek, a group of companies including Nortek Security & Control, LLC and others. The proceeding aims to determine if certain garage door openers from Nortek infringe specific claims of a U.S. patent in a case filed by The Chamberlain Group, Inc. The ITC has set a target date of six months for completing this proceeding and has assigned it to an administrative law judge for further proceedings and a recommendation. The Commission's review is focused on whether these products, which operate obstacle detectors at a constant energy level, are covered by the previously issued remedial orders.

The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed a case concerning NJOY, LLC's complaint against JUUL Labs, Inc. about certain vaporizer devices violating section 337. The Commission found no violation after evaluating the administrative law judge's initial findings. Although it reviewed some aspects like the non-infringement findings for a patent and economic issues, the decision not to find any violation was upheld, and the investigation was concluded.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from SkyBell Technologies, SB IP Holdings, and Eyetalk365, alleging that various companies violated trade rules by selling certain IP camera systems and video doorbells that infringe on several U.S. patents. They claim this is happening both through imports into the U.S. and sales inside the country. The complaint asks for an investigation and aims for an exclusion order and cease and desist orders against the companies involved. An investigation has been ordered to determine if these allegations are true, with responses from the accused companies needed within 20 days of being served the complaint.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is investigating whether Amazon violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing and selling electronic devices that allegedly infringe on several Nokia patents. The investigation focuses on technology in computers, streaming devices, and TVs, and currently only targets Amazon after HP settled. The Commission extended the investigation deadline to May 2025 and is seeking feedback on public interest, possible remedies, and bonding. It also plans to review the administrative judge's decision, which found a violation by Amazon regarding four patents, while ruling no violation on another patent.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is investigating potential violations related to products containing tirzepatide. On December 6, 2024, an administrative law judge issued an initial determination that partially found a violation of Section 337. The Commission is seeking public comments on the potential impact of excluding these products from the U.S. market or issuing cease and desist orders. Comments should address how these actions might affect public health, the economy, and consumer interests in the United States. Written submissions are due by January 8, 2025.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Spanx, LLC regarding certain shapewear garments. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by several companies, including infringements related to the importation and sale of these garments in the U.S. It requests the Commission to consider exclusion orders and penalties. The Commission is asking for public comments on how these potential orders could impact public health, the U.S. economy, and consumers.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is seeking public comments on potential public interest issues related to a possible violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation involves certain bone cements and bone cement accessories imported by Heraeus Medical GmbH and Heraeus Medical LLC. If a violation is found, the Commission may issue exclusion and cease and desist orders against these imports. The public is invited to submit comments by March 9, 2021, focusing on how such remedial actions might impact public health, the economy, and consumers in the United States.

The U.S. International Trade Commission announced that several companies have filed a complaint alleging violations of trademark laws concerning imported electrolyte beverages and their packaging that infringe on existing trademarks. The companies are asking for an investigation into these allegations, which may result in orders to stop these products from being imported or sold in the U.S. if violations are found. The investigation will look into whether the companies involved breached section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing these products and whether a U.S. industry is affected or being developed. Respondents have 20 days to respond to these allegations.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Cricut, Inc. alleging that certain crafting machines and components are being imported into the United States in violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Cricut claims that these imports infringe on several of its patents and requests the Commission to investigate and potentially issue exclusion orders to stop these imports. The complaint names multiple companies, mostly from China, as respondents. The Commission has initiated an investigation to determine if the allegations are true and to decide on the necessary actions based on the findings.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is asking for public and government input on possible actions it may take if it finds that certain companies violated trade rules by importing specific computing devices. The issue at hand involves a potential violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which could lead to limiting or stopping the import of products from companies like ASUSTeK Computer, Acer Inc., and Dell Technologies, among others. The public is invited to submit comments on whether these actions would affect public health, the economy, competition, or consumers in the United States by March 31, 2025. Submissions must be made electronically, and the correct protocol for confidential information must be followed.