Search Results for keywords:"Office of Administrative Law Judges"

Found 7 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Office of Administrative Law Judges"

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1800
    Reading Time:about 29 minutes

    The Department of Labor has introduced a new rule focusing on electronic filing and service procedures for cases handled by the Office of Administrative Law Judges. This rule mandates attorneys and representatives to use the Department's electronic system for filing and serving documents, making it easier and more streamlined. Individuals representing themselves can choose between electronic and traditional filing methods. Additionally, the rule covers various technical details, such as electronic signatures, the scheduling of hearings, and modifications to existing regulations to accommodate these new procedures.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Labor has made a new rule that says lawyers have to send important papers online when they go to court. People who don't have a lawyer can choose to do it online or the old way.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1862
    Reading Time:about 28 minutes

    The Department of Labor is proposing changes to improve the rules for administrative hearings before its Office of Administrative Law Judges. The main update is to require electronic filing and service of documents, making it easier and more efficient for lawyers and their clients. These rules also allow self-represented individuals to choose between electronic and traditional methods for filing papers. The Department has considered potential impacts and ensured that changes comply with relevant laws and regulations.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Labor wants to start using computers to share important papers for certain kinds of meetings, which will make it faster and easier for people who have lawyers. People who don't have lawyers can still use paper if they want, but the plan doesn't say much about how it might be tricky for some people who don't have computers or the internet.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8124
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    A complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission by China United Lines, Ltd. against Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon Logistics Inc., and Beijing Century Joyo Courier Service Co., Ltd. The complaint alleges that these companies violated specific sections of the U.S. Shipping Act by trying to obtain ocean transport services at reduced rates and avoiding paying fines by changing the reason for ending their contract with China United Lines. The respondents must respond to the complaint within 25 days. This case has been assigned to the Office of Administrative Law Judges, with an initial decision due by January 2026.

    Simple Explanation

    In a pretend game of "ocean shipping," a company named China United Lines says that Amazon and its friends did something wrong to get a better deal on boat rides for their packages and tried to change their story to avoid getting in trouble. Now, some special judges will decide who's right by next January.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11426
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Department of Labor has withdrawn a rule announced on January 11, 2021, that would have required electronic filing and service of legal documents, after receiving significant negative feedback. This rule, which aimed to make e-filing mandatory for individuals with legal representation, is no longer proceeding because of the comments received before the deadline. The Department will reopen the comment period for the related proposed rule and plans to conduct public sessions to gather more input on its electronic filing system. The Department will provide advance notice if a final rule requiring e-filing is issued.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Labor tried to make a rule that all lawyers have to send their paperwork over the internet, but some people didn't like this idea, so they decided to think about it more and ask people for their thoughts again.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 95213
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    Baylink Shipping Inc. has filed a complaint with the Federal Maritime Commission against ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd. The complaint claims that ZIM violated several sections of the U.S. Code and CFR by releasing a shipping container to the wrong party and charging inappropriate fees. The case will be handled by the Office of Administrative Law Judges, with an initial decision expected by November 2025 and a final decision by June 2026. Interested parties can read the full complaint on the Commission's website.

    Simple Explanation

    Baylink Shipping Inc. says that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services made a mistake by giving a shipping box to the wrong person and asking for too much money, so they've told the people in charge, and it might take a while for them to figure out what to do next.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 13364
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    A complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission by Francis Sheka Kanu against several companies, including Ejike Dickson Eze dba Ejike International Trade Limited, Sealines International, Seamates International, Inc., and Maersk. The complaint alleges that these companies failed to deliver a shipment as agreed, violating certain U.S. maritime laws. The case will be reviewed by the Office of Administrative Law Judges, with the initial decision due by March 17, 2026, and the final decision by October 1, 2026. The complaint and its proceedings can be accessed online through the Commission's electronic Reading Room.

    Simple Explanation

    A person named Francis complained that some shipping companies didn't deliver his stuff as they promised. The people in charge will check this out and decide what to do about it next year.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11425
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Department of Labor is withdrawing a rule that would have made electronic filing and service mandatory for legal representatives involved with the Benefits Review Board unless a different filing method was justified. This decision came after receiving significant negative feedback during the comment period, indicating some concerns with the filing system. While the rule won't take effect, the department plans to extend the comment period and hold listening sessions to gather more user feedback. The rule withdrawal applies to changes that were to be introduced on January 11, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The government wanted to make it so lawyers had to send important papers through computers, but some people didn't like the idea. So now, they're stopping that plan for now and will talk to more people to see what everyone thinks before making any changes.