The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided not to review a ruling by the administrative law judge allowing changes to a complaint in an investigation concerning artificial eyelash extension systems. The original complaint by Lashify, Inc. claimed that certain products were imported or sold in the U.S., infringing on some of their patents. The investigation originally named CVS Health Corporation and Ulta Beauty, Inc. as respondents, but the ruling allows substituting them with CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. This decision means the investigation will proceed with these updated parties, and authority for this determination comes from the Tariff Act of 1930.
Simple Explanation
There was a mix-up with names, so a complaint about fake eyelash products was updated to use the correct company names. Now, the investigation to see if those companies copied someone's idea can continue!