Search Results for keywords:"International Trade Commission"

Found 238 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"International Trade Commission"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7737
    Reading Time:about 16 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has started a review to decide if removing the antidumping duty on ironing tables and related parts from China would harm the U.S. industry. They are asking interested parties to provide information and feedback by specific deadlines. The review follows previous continuations of the duty order in 2010 and 2016, aiming to evaluate whether the domestic industry would face injury if the order is revoked. Anyone wishing to participate must submit the required information electronically and follow specific procedures outlined by the Commission.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is checking if stopping a special tax on ironing tables from China will hurt businesses here, and they want people to share what they think about it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7734
    Reading Time:about 17 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has started reviews to determine if removing duties on uncoated paper from China, Indonesia, Australia, Brazil, and Portugal might cause harm to U.S. industries. These reviews will consider the potential impact on production, prices, and imports of such paper. Companies and organizations involved in producing, importing, or exporting this paper are invited to submit relevant information by specified deadlines. The outcome will decide whether to maintain or revoke these trade orders.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is checking if taking away extra costs on paper from some other countries would hurt American paper makers, and they're asking companies to provide helpful information to decide.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7990
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Department of Commerce has issued a countervailing duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Turkey. This decision is based on positive determinations by the Department and the International Trade Commission that these subsidized imports harm U.S. industry. Consequently, countervailing duties will be imposed on certain imports entering the United States from September 21, 2020. Cash deposits will be required to enforce these duties until further notice, with specific provisions for provisional measures.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States is putting extra taxes on some steel cables from Turkey because they found out these cables are getting help from the Turkish government, which is making it hard for American companies to compete.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9963
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC) have determined that removing antidumping duties on persulfates from China would likely result in continued dumping and harm to U.S. industries. Therefore, the antidumping duties will remain in place. Persulfates include ammonium, potassium, and sodium persulfates, and the duties' continuation ensures fair trade practices. The next review of these duties will occur before five years pass from the latest ITC determination.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government decided to continue taxing certain chemical products from China so that they are sold at fair prices and do not harm American businesses by being too cheap.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 14273
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided that removing the antidumping duty order on diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel from Japan could harm U.S. industries. They conducted a quick review of this decision, starting on September 3, 2024, and concluded on March 25, 2025, before publishing their findings. The Commission's decision is documented in the report titled "Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1206 (Second Review)."

    Simple Explanation

    The ITC looked at special metal from Japan that goes into making things, like cars, and decided that taking away a special tax might hurt people who make things in the U.S. They talked about this carefully and then wrote down what they found.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 104561
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a change in the schedule for its investigations regarding float glass products from China and Malaysia. This adjustment is due to the Department of Commerce extending its decision-making deadline to December 31, 2024. As a result, the USITC must make preliminary determinations by January 27, 2025, and share their conclusions with the Department of Commerce by February 3, 2025. These investigations are being conducted under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Simple Explanation

    The US International Trade Commission is making changes to their schedule for looking into glass products from China and Malaysia. They need to finish their checks and tell another group, the Department of Commerce, by early next year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9914
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission is inviting public contributions to its 2025 report on U.S. services trade. This report will offer data on cross-border trade in services for 2019-2023 and transactions by foreign affiliates for 2018-2022. It will focus on professional services like accounting, advertising, and legal services. The Commission plans to release this report online by May 30, 2025, and all submissions must be filed electronically by February 3, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The government wants to know what people think about how different services like accounting and legal help are traded between countries. They're going to share what people say in a big report coming out in May 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 13626
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has announced a schedule for a full review regarding the impact of potentially ending the investigation into fresh tomatoes imported from Mexico. This review, conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930, will examine whether ending the suspension could result in material injury reoccurring or continuing in a foreseeable future. The Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days due to the review's complexity. Interested parties must submit requests and information by specified dates, with hearings and submissions scheduled through September 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The International Trade Commission is checking to see if stopping a study on tomatoes from Mexico might hurt businesses in the future, and they've decided to take a bit longer to finish this check. They want to make sure everyone gets a chance to say what they think, so they’ve extended the time they have to listen to people until September 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10063
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping duty order on persulfates imported from China. The decision is based on findings that removing the order could lead to the continuation of unfair pricing and harm to U.S. industries. This means that customs will keep collecting duties on imports of persulfates at current rates, which is intended to maintain fair market conditions. The continuation comes as part of a regular review process that occurs every five years.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. has decided to keep a special rule that charges extra money on a particular chemical coming from China to stop it from being sold for really cheap, which can hurt local businesses. This means U.S. companies that make similar stuff can still compete fairly.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 99277
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed an investigation concerning certain networking equipment supporting NETCONF and determined that there was no infringement of asserted U.S. patents, leading to no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This decision affirmed an initial ruling, known as Order No. 19, and led to the termination of the investigation. Additionally, the Commission granted a third party, Xenogenic Development, LLC, limited rights to intervene to discuss the ownership of the patents, although this did not change the outcome. The investigation's termination is based on the finding of no infringement.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided that certain network gadgets didn't copy someone else's invention, so they canceled the investigation. They also let a company talk a little bit about who really owns the inventions, but it didn't change anything in the end.

123 Next