Search Results for keywords:"Antidumping Duty"

The U.S. Department of Commerce and key Argentine lemon juice exporters signed an amendment to a previous agreement that pauses an investigation into potential unfair pricing of lemon juice imports from Argentina. This amendment updates how pricing is set and introduces better monitoring and enforcement to prevent price undercutting in the U.S. market. The document outlines specific requirements for compliance from exporters and details of how these prices can change over time. It aims to eliminate harmful effects on U.S. lemon juice producers while keeping the agreement effective and in the public interest.

The U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it is immediately ending its policy of issuing liquidation instructions for certain antidumping and countervailing duty cases 15 days after a final decision is published, if no statutory injunction is requested. This policy was initially put in place in 2002 to give Customs and Border Protection enough time to process these cases and avoid any automatic liquidations. The policy change applies only to goods not originating from Canada and Mexico, as they were already exempt from the 15-day rule.

The Department of Commerce conducted an administrative review on the import of glycine from China for the period between March 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020. They confirmed that some companies had not shipped glycine to the U.S. during this time, while Avid Organics Private Limited remains part of the China-wide entity subject to antidumping duties. The final assessment ensures that antidumping duties will be applied appropriately, with the China-wide entity facing a rate of 155.89 percent. Additionally, cash deposit requirements and policies for importers and companies involved in the trade of glycine from China have been outlined.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has conducted an expedited sunset review regarding the antidumping duty order on Laminated Woven Sacks (LWS) from Vietnam. The review found that revoking this order would likely lead to continued or repeated dumping, with dumping margins potentially as high as 292.61%. These findings are published as the final results of the review. The document serves as a reminder to parties involved to handle proprietary information according to regulations.

The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations into imports of ceramic tile from India. These investigations, under the Tariff Act of 1930, aim to determine if these imports, alleged to be subsidized and sold at unfairly low prices, are harming the U.S. ceramic tile industry. The investigations were initiated based on a petition from the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile, a group of American ceramic tile manufacturers. The USITC will conduct hearings and allow for written submissions from interested parties, with the aim of protecting local industry from unfair international trade practices.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews to see if stopping antidumping duty orders on strontium chromate from Austria and France would harm U.S. companies. The reviews are part of the Tariff Act of 1930 and are happening because of an adequate response from U.S. companies and inadequate response from others. The Commission will release a public report and accept written comments until March 13, 2025, unless extended by the Department of Commerce. The review period may be extended by up to 90 days due to its complexity.

The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a supplemental schedule for ongoing investigations into imports of melamine from India. This schedule follows the Department of Commerce's final affirmative determinations that melamine from India is subject to countervailing and antidumping duties. Interested parties must submit comments on these determinations by February 24, 2025, but cannot include new factual information, and submissions are limited to five pages. All documents related to these investigations must be filed electronically via the USITC's Electronic Document Information System, as no paper filings will be accepted.

The United States International Trade Commission is investigating whether the U.S. industry is being harmed by imports of chassis from China, which may be sold at unfair prices and subsidized by the Chinese government. These chassis are equipment used for transporting containers and other goods by road or rail. The investigation aims to determine if these imports are negatively impacting the American market or hindering the growth of the U.S. industry. Public participation is encouraged, and a hearing is scheduled for March 16, 2021, where interested parties can present their views.

The U.S. Department of Commerce is reviewing an antidumping duty order on superabsorbent polymers from South Korea for the period from June 7, 2022, to November 30, 2023. They found that LG Chem, Ltd., a South Korean company, did not sell their products in the U.S. at unfairly low prices during this time. Interested parties can submit comments on these preliminary findings. The Commerce Department will determine any necessary antidumping duties and provide instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection once the review is completed.

The United States International Trade Commission announced an expedited review to decide if ending the antidumping duty on malleable iron pipe fittings from China would likely cause harm to U.S. industries. This review follows the Tariff Act of 1930, and the Commission found the local industry's response sufficient but China's inadequate, prompting a quicker review. Written comments from interested parties are due by May 8, 2025. The Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days, deeming the matter extraordinarily complicated.