Search Results for keywords:"Air Quality Standards"

Found 16 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Air Quality Standards"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 1105
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final guidance document intended to help state, local, and tribal air agencies demonstrate how international emissions affect local air quality standards under the Clean Air Act's Section 179B. This guidance provides examples of information and analyses that agencies should consider using, and it explains a "weight of evidence" approach for evaluations. While it doesn't create regulatory requirements, it could assist agencies in meeting air quality standards by offering flexibility in the development of demonstrations showing an area's potential compliance had it not been for international emissions. The document emphasizes cooperation with existing regulatory frameworks and other suitable mechanisms without directly creating new regulations.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has shared a guide to help places in the U.S. show how pollution coming from other countries affects their air and makes it hard to be clean. This doesn't make new rules but gives them ideas on how to prove pollution problems are not all their fault.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 101477
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule confirming that the nonattainment areas in Freestone and Anderson Counties and Titus County, Texas, have met the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide air quality standards by the deadline of January 12, 2022. This decision was based on evidence like shutdowns of major pollution sources, air quality monitoring data, and emissions modeling. The rule also specifies that these areas remain designated as nonattainment until formally redesignated by the EPA. This decision obeys the Clean Air Act requirements and does not impose new obligations beyond what the Act mandates.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA checked the air in some parts of Texas to see if it was cleaner and found it was safe enough, mostly because some big polluters closed down. They decided these areas still need to be watched before they can be called completely clean.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11681
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of part of a plan submitted by the State of Arizona. This plan is designed to improve air quality by controlling particulate matter (PM) emissions from agricultural activities in certain parts of the state. The EPA recognizes that the proposed updates to Arizona's regulations could help reduce harmful PM emissions, but it also identified some deficiencies that don't fully meet federal standards. The EPA is considering approving the changes to add new control measures, while also initiating a process to address the unresolved issues.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is saying Arizona made a plan to keep the air cleaner by controlling dusty stuff from farms, but Arizona's plan needs a little more work to meet all the rules. So, the EPA likes some parts of the plan but thinks Arizona needs to fix a few things first.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 101896
    Reading Time:about 20 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially approved the State of Washington's request to redesignate a part of Whatcom County from a "nonattainment" area to an "attainment" area for sulfur dioxide (SOâ‚‚) air quality standards. This redesignation follows the closure of the Intalco Aluminum LLC smelter, which previously caused high SOâ‚‚ levels. Alongside the redesignation, EPA has approved Washington's maintenance plan to ensure the area continues to meet air quality standards, which includes monitoring strategies for future potential pollution sources. This decision was finalized on December 11, 2024, and becomes effective on January 16, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA said yes to Washington's request to fix air pollution by changing a part of Whatcom County to be healthy again after a dirty factory closed, and they'll keep checking the air to make sure it stays clean.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1600
    Reading Time:about 3 hours

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions submitted by the State of Alaska aimed at meeting Clean Air Act requirements. These revisions address air quality standards for the Fairbanks North Star Borough, targeting fine particulate matter pollution. The plan includes inventories of emissions, control measures for pollutants, and an attainment timeline set for the year 2027. Public comments on the proposal are being accepted until February 7, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The government wants to make the air cleaner in a place in Alaska by following special rules and plans, and they are asking people what they think about these ideas until February next year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10909
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to extend the information collection for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) related to Ferroalloys Production Area Sources. This proposal requests public comments for an additional 30 days, due by March 31, 2025, concerning the continued collection efforts. The NESHAP regulations require facilities to report and maintain records to ensure compliance with air quality standards. The EPA expects no changes in the burden or costs associated with the regulations since there has been no change in the rules and minimal industry growth.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep collecting information from companies that make Ferroalloys, to make sure they follow air pollution rules, and they're asking if anyone has any comments or thoughts about this plan before they decide.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11694
    Reading Time:about 67 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to approve Utah's request to redesignate the Logan, Utah-Idaho area to meet the air quality standards for PM2.5, a type of fine particulate matter. This decision follows Utah's demonstration that the area has achieved the required air quality standards through permanent and enforceable emission reductions. The approval would involve updates to the Utah State Implementation Plan (SIP), which includes various local air quality control measures. The plan also outlines continued monitoring to ensure air quality is maintained and sets contingency measures if air quality standards are exceeded in the future.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to approve Utah's plan to clean up the air in a specific area, showing that it now meets safety standards for tiny, potentially harmful particles. This decision will change some local air rules and include checks to keep the air clean in the future.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10015
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved changes to Washington's air quality plan, which were submitted in 2018. This approval confirms that Washington's plan satisfies federal requirements for controlling interstate pollution of sulfur dioxide, a harmful air pollutant. The EPA found that emissions from Washington will not significantly affect air quality in other states, meeting the standards set in 2010. This rule takes effect on March 22, 2021, and stakeholders can find more information or address inquiries as directed in the details provided by the EPA.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has agreed that Washington's new rules for cleaning the air are okay because they make sure the smoke and bad stuff in the air won't bother people in other places, and this will start being official on March 22, 2021.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 104476
    Reading Time:about 25 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to reject revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) aimed at meeting the ozone standards set in 2008 for Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) areas. These revisions, submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality between 2015 and 2020, failed to show that these areas could achieve the required air quality standards by their respective deadlines, leading to their reclassification as more severe nonattainment areas. Consequently, the EPA is proposing to disapprove the related emissions control strategies and budgets associated with these submissions. This decision aligns with federal regulations that mandate EPA action on SIP submissions that have not been withdrawn.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to say "no" to a plan Texas made to clean the air in two big cities, because the plan didn't show it could make the air better in time.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 13116
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    On January 22, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule called the "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources Technology Review." The EPA has decided to extend the deadline for public comments on this rule from March 24, 2025, to April 14, 2025, giving people more time to review and share their thoughts. Comments can be submitted through various methods including online, email, fax, mail, or in-person delivery to the EPA's Docket Center. The EPA encourages those submitting comments to include all necessary information to ensure their voices are heard.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wanted people to tell them what they think about some new rules for factories, and they gave everyone extra time to do so. Now, people have until April 14, 2025, to share their thoughts.

123 Next