Search Results for citation:"86 FR 11999"

Found 2 results

Search Results: citation:"86 FR 11999"

💰 Only
Oldest Newest
  • 2021-04128 — KOPPERS CO., Inc. (Charleston Plant), Charleston, North Carolina; Notice of Modified Settlement
    Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11999
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a modification to an existing settlement related to the Koppers Co., Inc. Superfund Site in Charleston, South Carolina. This modification includes a newly acquired parcel that was not part of the original agreement made in 2019. The public is invited to comment on this modified settlement until March 31, 2021. Comments can be submitted online or via email, and the EPA will consider all feedback to determine if changes to the settlement are needed.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA changed a deal about cleaning up a special dirty place in Charleston, South Carolina, to add some new land that wasn't included before. People can share their thoughts about this change until the end of March.

  • 2021-04127 — Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program: Petitions for Objection to State Operating Permit for Hunter Power Plant (Emery County, Utah) and State Operating Permit for Coyote Station Power Plant (Mercer County, North Dakota)
    Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11999
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced final decisions on petitions challenging state operating permits for two power plants. The EPA Administrator denied petitions from the Sierra Club to object to the Clean Air Act title V operating permits for the Hunter Power Plant in Utah, and from Casey and Julie Voigt regarding the Coyote Station Power Plant in North Dakota. These decisions mean the EPA did not find enough reason to object to the permits despite claims about inadequate pollution controls and lack of compliance with federal standards. The EPA detailed its reasoning for these denials and directed a review of the Hunter Power Plant's 2020 permit.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA looked into complaints about pollution rules at two power plants in Utah and North Dakota, but decided not to change the permits because they didn't find enough problems with the plants' pollution controls.