Search Results for keywords:"material injury"

The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has determined that if anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China are revoked, it would likely harm U.S. industries by continuing or recurring material injury. This decision follows reviews that began on July 1, 2020, and were expedited in October 2020. The findings were completed and filed on February 5, 2021, and are detailed in USITC Publication 5158. Commissioner David S. Johanson disagreed with the majority decision.

The International Trade Commission announced an expedited review to assess whether removing the antidumping duty on hand trucks from China would likely result in significant harm to the U.S. industry. This decision follows the Commission's finding that the response from domestic parties was adequate, while the response from respondents was not. Interested parties involved in the review can submit comments by January 15, 2021, and electronic submissions are currently required. The review period may extend by up to 90 days due to its complexity.

The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) decided that if the antidumping duty orders on certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan were removed, it would likely harm the U.S. industry in the near future. These reviews were reinstated after a court ordered a reevaluation following a previous decision to revoke these orders. The USITC completed their review and published their findings in a document dated February 21, 2025.

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping duty orders on certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan. This action is based on findings that lifting these duties could lead to the recurrence of dumping and harm to U.S. industries. The orders, which have been in place since 2012, will remain effective, ensuring that U.S. Customs continues to collect duty deposits on these imports. The next review of these orders is planned before the fifth anniversary of the ITC's last determination.

The Commerce Department's International Trade Administration is starting a countervailing duty investigation on sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains from China, following a petition filed by a U.S. producer, Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. The petition claims that these products benefit from unfair subsidies provided by the Chinese government and harm the U.S. industry by increasing imports, reducing market share, and depressing prices. The investigation will check whether the subsidies are causing material injury or threatening to cause injury. Interested parties can submit comments on the scope of the investigation and must follow specific filing requirements through the Commerce Department's electronic system.

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission have decided to continue existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on raw flexible magnets from China and Taiwan. These orders are in place to prevent unfair pricing and subsidies that harm U.S. industries. The review found that revoking these orders might lead to more dumping and subsidies, negatively affecting U.S. industries. Therefore, the orders will remain in effect, with Customs and Border Protection continuing to enforce them.

The United States International Trade Commission has started investigations to determine if temporary steel fencing imported from China is harming U.S. industries by being sold at unfairly low prices or subsidized by the Chinese government. These investigations were triggered by a petition from ZND US Inc on January 15, 2025. The Commission must make a preliminary decision regarding these accusations by March 3, 2025, and submit their findings by March 10, 2025. People interested in participating in these investigations or submitting relevant information need to follow specific procedures for filing and registration.

The United States International Trade Commission has scheduled expedited reviews to determine if removing antidumping duties on uncovered innerspring units from China, South Africa, and Vietnam would likely cause harm to domestic industries. These reviews are conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930 and are considered extraordinarily complicated, prompting the Commission to extend the review period by up to 90 days. Interested parties can submit written comments by March 6, 2025, but they must not include new factual information. A public version of the staff report will be available after February 26, 2025.

The International Trade Commission is conducting a full review to determine if removing the antidumping duty on certain large diameter line pipes from Japan would lead to continued harm to the U.S. industry. They have decided to extend this review by up to 90 days, as allowed under their authority. People interested in participating as parties to the review must submit an entry of appearance 45 days after this notice's publication. The Commission will hold a hearing on September 11, 2025, and people can submit written comments on the review by specific deadlines noted in the notice.

The United States International Trade Commission has decided to maintain the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China. This decision is based on the findings that removing these orders would likely harm a U.S. industry. These reviews were initiated in September 2024 and conducted on an expedited basis, with final determinations completed in March 2025. The results are detailed in a publication by the Commission.