Search Results for agency_names:"International Trade Commission"

Found 259 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: agency_names:"International Trade Commission"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11546
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission is conducting an expedited review to determine if revoking the antidumping duty on mattresses from China would likely cause material injury to the U.S. market. This review, conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930, follows a finding that domestic responses to its inquiry were adequate, while responses from Chinese parties were not. Interested parties can submit written comments by April 17, 2025, with restrictions on new factual information. The review has been identified as extraordinarily complicated, and the Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is checking if stopping a special tax on mattresses from China could hurt businesses in the U.S. They want to make sure that American companies are treated fairly, and people have until April 17, 2025, to say what they think about this.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9435
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has issued a notice about their plan to do a full review of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from several countries, including China and India. The review will check if removing these duties could cause harm to U.S. industries. The review period may be extended by up to 90 days, and there are several important dates and procedures for businesses and interested parties to participate. A public hearing on this matter is scheduled for July 24, 2025, and various guidelines for document submissions and appearances have been outlined.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is looking at special taxes on steel from some countries, like China and India, to see if stopping these taxes would hurt businesses in the U.S. They want to take a closer look, and people can say what they think about it in July.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 12567
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided not to review an initial decision by an administrative law judge to terminate an investigation regarding certain hydrodermabrasion systems. This decision came after HydraFacial LLC requested to withdraw its complaint, which accused several companies of patent infringement. The involved companies did not oppose this withdrawal. The authority for this decision is section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided not to continue looking into a complaint about special machines used for skin care because the company, HydraFacial, changed its mind and took back what it said without anyone arguing against it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 1191
    Reading Time:about 19 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has announced the final stage of investigations into whether the American industry is harmed by crystalline silicon photovoltaic products (solar panels) imported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. These products are suspected of being subsidized and sold at less-than-fair market value in the U.S., which could negatively impact American businesses. The investigations, in response to a petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, will determine if tariffs or other measures are necessary to address any unfair trade practices. Public hearings and submission opportunities are scheduled as part of the investigation process.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is checking if solar panels from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam are being sold too cheaply and hurting American jobs, and they might add extra taxes if needed.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 104561
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a change in the schedule for its investigations regarding float glass products from China and Malaysia. This adjustment is due to the Department of Commerce extending its decision-making deadline to December 31, 2024. As a result, the USITC must make preliminary determinations by January 27, 2025, and share their conclusions with the Department of Commerce by February 3, 2025. These investigations are being conducted under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Simple Explanation

    The US International Trade Commission is making changes to their schedule for looking into glass products from China and Malaysia. They need to finish their checks and tell another group, the Department of Commerce, by early next year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7414
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) decided to end an investigation about certain motorized self-balancing vehicles because the issue became moot. Initially, the investigation began because Razor USA and others claimed certain companies were violating patent laws, but after some legal discussions and a Federal Circuit Court remand, the ITC found the case unnecessary to pursue further. The investigation showed some products infringed on patents, but changes in patent claims and other factors led to the decision that the case did not need to continue. The decision to terminate the investigation was officially voted on and recorded on January 22, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge of making sure companies follow the rules about selling certain fun scooters decided to stop looking into a problem because the problem was no longer important. Some companies argued that others were copying their ideas unfairly, but things changed, and it didn't matter anymore to keep checking.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 7157
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission reviewed an investigation regarding the importation and sale of certain photovoltaic connectors, which allegedly infringed on specific patent claims. Initially, there was a finding of a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act concerning the '153 patent. However, upon review, the Commission reversed this finding, determining that there was no violation due to the accused products not satisfying the necessary patent claims. The investigation has been concluded with no violation found.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission looked into special plugs for solar panels and at first thought they broke some rules, but then changed their mind and found they didn't. Now, everything is okay with those plugs.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9975
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission has determined that if the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on laminated woven sacks from China are revoked, it would likely harm industries in the United States in the foreseeable future. The Commission began these reviews on July 1, 2024, and expedited the process in October 2024. The decisions were finalized and filed on February 13, 2025, as documented in the USITC Publication 5589.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States decided to keep rules in place that make it more expensive for certain bags from China to be sold here because taking those rules away could hurt the businesses that make these kinds of bags in America.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11548
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission announced an expedited review to decide if ending the antidumping duty on malleable iron pipe fittings from China would likely cause harm to U.S. industries. This review follows the Tariff Act of 1930, and the Commission found the local industry's response sufficient but China's inadequate, prompting a quicker review. Written comments from interested parties are due by May 8, 2025. The Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days, deeming the matter extraordinarily complicated.

    Simple Explanation

    The International Trade Commission wants to see if stopping special taxes on certain pipe parts from China would hurt American companies. They are checking quickly because China's response to their questions wasn't as good as they hoped.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 1544
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from InOvate Acquisition Company about certain dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies imported from Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd. of China. They claim these imports violate U.S. trade laws and are seeking a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission is inviting comments from the public on whether these actions would impact public health, welfare, and the U.S. economy. Comments are due eight days after the notice is published in the Federal Register, and must be submitted electronically.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government is looking into a complaint about a company in China making dryer parts that might break trade rules, and they want to know if stopping these parts from coming into the country would be good or bad for people and the economy. They are asking people to share their thoughts by a specific deadline by sending them online.