Search Results for keywords:"EPA"

Found 291 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"EPA"

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 7037
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received a petition from the Attorneys General of several states, asking the agency to change the rules about pesticide labeling requirements. They want the EPA to ensure that no state can have pesticide labels that conflict with the EPA's findings about health risks, like cancer or birth defects, identified during their risk assessments. The public is invited to comment on this petition until February 20, 2025. The EPA is considering modifying its regulations to prevent such inconsistent state labeling from being allowed.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA got a letter from some states asking to make sure that all states use the same rules on pesticide labels, especially about things that could make people sick, like cancer. They want people to share what they think about this idea by February 20, 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 10567
    Reading Time:about 65 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has made available a collection of applicability determinations, alternative monitoring decisions, and regulatory interpretations related to various air quality standards and programs, such as NSPS, NESHAP, and others. These determinations help clarify whether specific facilities or equipment must follow certain EPA regulations, and they often involve evaluating requests for alternative monitoring methods or exemptions. A summary of 59 documents added to the Applicability Determination Index on October 22, 2020, includes topics like monitoring plans for emissions from industrial processes and compliance with air quality standards for specific facilities. These documents are available online for public access, and complete details can be found through the EPA's Clean Air Act Compliance Monitoring website.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has shared decisions on rules for air pollution from factories and other sources, showing which rules apply to them and if any special exceptions are allowed. These decisions are helpful for understanding how to keep the air clean, even though the details can be tricky to understand.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 95121
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final rule that both approves and disapproves parts of Wyoming's revised Regional Haze Plan from 2022. This plan was meant to tackle air pollution affecting visibility in national parks and other protected areas. The EPA approved parts of the plan related to visibility conditions and monitoring strategies, but disapproved other parts, including long-term strategies and progress goals, because Wyoming did not adequately justify their choices and failed to include necessary emissions control measures. This rule will take effect on January 2, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA looked at Wyoming's plan to clear up dirty air that makes it hard to see in beautiful places like parks. They liked some ideas but didn't like others because Wyoming didn't explain them well or include all the needed steps to clean the air.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 894
    Reading Time:about 86 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to regulate the chemical known as Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1) (PIP (3:1)). This rule prohibits the processing and distribution of PIP (3:1) and products containing it, with certain exceptions for specific industries like aviation and automotive, where no safer alternatives exist. The rule also bans the release of this chemical into water and mandates that commercial users follow best practices to prevent such releases. The regulation aims to reduce the manufacture, use, and disposal of PIP (3:1), thereby lowering the risk of exposure to humans and the environment.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a rule to make sure a big, complicated chemical called PIP (3:1) isn't used too much because it could be bad for people and nature. This rule stops PIP (3:1) from getting into the water and from being used, except in special cases where it's really needed, like in airplanes or cars.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 99856
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to submit an information collection request for the SmartWay Transport Partnership to the Office of Management and Budget. The EPA is asking for public comments on the proposed data collection, which aims to assess energy and air quality in the freight industry, including strategies to reduce idling and fuel consumption. Organizations involved in freight operations can join the program and must report transportation-related data annually. The response to this collection is voluntary, with the estimated total annual cost for respondents being $732,210.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep track of how much energy and air pollution trucks make and asks truck companies to share their data to help save fuel and keep the air clean. They want to hear what people think about this idea, and it's okay for companies to choose if they want to share their information.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11678
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve changes to Utah's air quality management plan, called the State Implementation Plan (SIP). These changes were submitted by Utah on November 5, 2019, to comply with certain state legislative requirements, specifically Utah's 2019 House Bill 155. The revisions aim to update rules related to smoke management from prescribed fires and streamline previous regulations. The EPA intends to approve these changes under section 110 of the Clean Air Act to ensure the state meets federal air quality standards while also reducing redundancy and outdated components in the rules.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to change some air rules in Utah to help manage smoke from fires better, just like Utah planned in 2019. They want to make sure the air is cleaner and the rules are easier to follow.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 99180
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision from South Carolina's Department of Health and Environmental Control. This revision updates the state's participation in the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) emissions trading programs for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). These programs are designed to help reduce air pollution that affects other states. The EPA believes the proposed changes align with federal requirements and do not impose new obligations beyond what state law already specifies.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to say yes to South Carolina's plan to update how they trade pollution credits for certain gases that can travel to other states. These updates help keep the air cleaner, and the plan follows all the rules without adding new ones.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 103734
    Reading Time:about 18 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to disapprove parts of a plan by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to manage air quality fees in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area. This plan was meant to address a rule requiring fees for emitting too much ozone. The EPA says the proposed plan doesn't meet the rule's requirements since it allows ending the fee program too soon without redesignating the area as having good air quality. Even if disapproved, Texas does not need to fix these plan parts due to other rule changes that ended the requirement for the fee program.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to say "no" to part of Texas's plan to fix air pollution fees in one area because the plan lets them stop charging too soon. But, Texas doesn't have to change it since the fee rule doesn't apply anymore.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10178
    Reading Time:about 14 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final rule that amends the existing exemption for residues of Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA). This change allows CPPA to be used not only as a plant growth regulator but also as a nematicide, which is a type of pesticide that kills nematodes. The EPA concluded that the use of CPPA, when applied following proper practices, presents no risk to the U.S. population, including infants and children. This decision follows a petition by FBSciences, Inc. and upholds safety standards set under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is letting a special chemical called CPPA be used to help plants grow and to stop tiny worms called nematodes from hurting them. They checked and said it's safe for everyone when used properly.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 10269
    Reading Time:about 43 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued the 2021 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for stormwater discharges from industrial activities. This permit replaces the expired 2015 MSGP and covers eligible operators in areas where the EPA is the permitting authority, including states, Indian country lands, and U.S. territories. The new permit introduces changes such as streamlined language, public signs for permit coverage, and new monitoring requirements. It will be effective from March 1, 2021, and lasts for five years, aiming to ensure compliance with the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has made some new rules about how rainwater from factories can go into rivers without making them dirty. These rules started in March 2021 and help keep the water clean for everyone.