Search Results for keywords:"expedited review"

Found 21 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"expedited review"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 2022
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission decided that if they remove tariffs on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from China, it could harm the U.S. industry. This conclusion is based on a five-year review and was finalized on January 3, 2025. The review process started in June 2024 and was expedited in September 2024. Two commissioners did not participate in this decision.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States Trade Commission checked if taking away tariffs, which are special taxes, on certain pipe parts from China might hurt U.S. businesses and decided that removing them could be bad. Two people who usually help make these decisions weren't involved, but we don't know why.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 10597
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has announced an expedited review under the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if ending the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts from China would likely result in further harm to U.S. industry. The review began on November 6, 2020, after determining that the domestic party response was adequate, while the response from the respondent party was inadequate. Interested parties who have provided sufficient responses can submit comments by February 25, 2021. The review has been deemed complex, allowing the Commission to extend it by up to 90 days.

    Simple Explanation

    The Commission is checking to see if taking away a special tax on diamond blades from China would hurt businesses in the U.S., and they are doing it quickly but carefully. Some people gave enough information, but others did not, so the review is more complicated and might take longer.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11327
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission is conducting an expedited review under the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether ending the antidumping duty order on steel nails imported from China would likely cause harm to U.S. industries. The review process began on February 4, 2025, when the Commission decided that the response from domestic parties was adequate, while the response from foreign parties was not. Written comments from interested parties are due by March 19, 2025, and the public version of the staff report will be issued after that date. The Commission has decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days due to its complexity.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is checking if stopping a special tax on nails from China would hurt American businesses, and people can say what they think by March 19, 2025. They might need extra time because it's a tricky question.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 2001
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The International Trade Commission announced an expedited review to assess whether removing the antidumping duty on hand trucks from China would likely result in significant harm to the U.S. industry. This decision follows the Commission's finding that the response from domestic parties was adequate, while the response from respondents was not. Interested parties involved in the review can submit comments by January 15, 2021, and electronic submissions are currently required. The review period may extend by up to 90 days due to its complexity.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is checking if stopping the extra taxes on hand trucks from China would hurt American companies. They want to make sure everyone who has something to say about it sends their comments quickly so they can decide.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8340
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Department of Commerce has completed its third sunset reviews on antidumping duty orders for carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India and China. It found that removing these orders would likely result in continued or renewed dumping, with potential dumping margins going up to 241.32% for China and 44.80% for India. The decision was made after Sun Chemical Corporation participated in the review, but no substantial responses were received from other parties. Commerce conducted expedited reviews because there were no substantive responses from respondent interested parties.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce studied and decided that if they removed special rules stopping some companies in India and China from selling a purple color powder (called CVP-23) too cheaply in America, these companies would likely start doing it again.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9074
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has conducted an expedited review to check if removing the antidumping duty for mattresses imported from China would lead to unfair pricing, known as dumping. They found that if the duties were revoked, dumping would likely continue, with rates potentially reaching up to 1,731.75%. This review was carried out without any response from interested parties in China and involves several U.S. companies and organizations that filed to maintain the duties. The decision was made based on legal frameworks and previous data on the issue.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce looked at bed mattresses from China and decided that if they stopped a special tax (called an antidumping duty) on these mattresses, the companies might sell them for really low prices again, which isn't fair to American companies. They decided to keep the tax to stop that from happening.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11546
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission is conducting an expedited review to determine if revoking the antidumping duty on mattresses from China would likely cause material injury to the U.S. market. This review, conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930, follows a finding that domestic responses to its inquiry were adequate, while responses from Chinese parties were not. Interested parties can submit written comments by April 17, 2025, with restrictions on new factual information. The review has been identified as extraordinarily complicated, and the Commission has extended the review period by up to 90 days.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is checking if stopping a special tax on mattresses from China could hurt businesses in the U.S. They want to make sure that American companies are treated fairly, and people have until April 17, 2025, to say what they think about this.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8716
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission has decided that removing the antidumping duty on steel wire garment hangers from China would likely cause harm to a U.S. industry in the foreseeable future. This decision is part of the Commission’s five-year review process, which started on July 1, 2024. The review concluded in January 2025, with the Commission choosing to conduct an expedited review. One Commissioner, however, did not participate in this determination.

    Simple Explanation

    The people who make important decisions about trading goods between countries have decided that if they stop charging extra fees on wire clothes hangers coming from China, it might hurt people who make hangers in America. They thought about it for a long time and decided to keep the fees to protect the people making hangers here.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8940
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has scheduled expedited reviews to determine if removing antidumping duties on uncovered innerspring units from China, South Africa, and Vietnam would likely cause harm to domestic industries. These reviews are conducted under the Tariff Act of 1930 and are considered extraordinarily complicated, prompting the Commission to extend the review period by up to 90 days. Interested parties can submit written comments by March 6, 2025, but they must not include new factual information. A public version of the staff report will be available after February 26, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is checking if taking away extra fees on springy bed parts from China, South Africa, and Vietnam would hurt American businesses. They want to make sure everything is fair and people's opinions can be shared by early March.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11506
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that ending the countervailing duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from China would likely lead to the continuation of unfair government subsidies. In their review, the Department did not receive a sufficient response from the Chinese government but received input from U.S. producers such as Bristol Metals, Felker Brothers, and Primus Pipe and Tube. Because of this lack of response from China, the Department conducted an expedited review. The decision and more detailed information are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is accessible online.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce thinks that if the rules about stopping special money support for Chinese pipes are removed, China might keep giving unfair help to their pipe makers. Because China didn't say much about this, the U.S. did a quick check with help from some American pipe makers.