Search Results for keywords:"cease and desist orders"

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is requesting public comments on a case concerning certain wearable monitoring devices. An administrative law judge has found a potential violation of Section 337 regarding the import and sale of these devices by various companies, including Fitbit and Garmin. The ITC is considering issuing exclusion orders and cease and desist orders, but they want feedback on how these actions might impact public health, competition, and consumers in the U.S. Public comments are due by March 8, 2021, and should address specific issues like the availability and production of alternative products and potential impacts on consumers.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has started a formal enforcement proceeding regarding cease and desist orders issued in an investigation about certain blood flow restriction devices. This action relates to the alleged infringement of U.S. patents and trademarks by two companies, Rhino, Inc. from Delaware and Wuxi Emsrun Technology Co., Ltd. from China. Despite previous orders, these companies are accused of continuing to sell products that violate these protections. The Commission will investigate these allegations and determine if any enforcement measures are needed.

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided not to review a decision by an administrative law judge regarding violations of section 337, involving products containing tirzepatide. These violations included trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and false advertising by certain companies. The ITC is now asking for written submissions from different parties on potential remedies, public interests, and bonding issues. If a remedy is ordered, it might include stopping these products from entering the U.S. or cease and desist orders against the companies involved.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Wilson Electronics LLC on January 21, 2021, claiming that certain cellular signal boosters, repeaters, and related equipment infringe multiple U.S. patents. The complaint suggests that these products are being imported, sold for importation, and sold within the United States in violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission decided to initiate an investigation into these allegations. The investigation will determine whether these imports infringe the mentioned patents and if a U.S. industry is adversely affected, leading to possible exclusion and cease and desist orders against the respondents.

A complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 5, 2024, by Schütz Container Systems, Inc. and Protechna S.A., alleging that imported composite intermediate bulk containers violate multiple U.S. patents. The complaint accuses several Chinese companies of infringing on these patents and requests the Commission to investigate and potentially issue exclusion and cease and desist orders. An investigation has been initiated to look into these claims and whether a relevant industry exists in the U.S. The Commission has also outlined details for the investigation process and response requirements for the accused entities.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has begun an investigation regarding a complaint filed by Husky Injection Molding Systems from Canada and Vermont. The complaint accuses NINGBO AO SHENG MOLD CO., LTD., a company from China, of importing and selling specific injection molding components and products that infringe on five U.S. patents. This investigation seeks to determine any violations and assess whether a related industry exists within the U.S. If the allegations are confirmed, the Commission may issue orders preventing further importation and sales of the infringing items.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is reviewing a case involving alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act, which concerns icemaking machines and the infringement of certain patents owned by Hoshizaki America, Inc. The Commission is seeking written input from involved parties and interested stakeholders on specific legal and technical questions regarding patent equivalence and remedies like exclusion orders or cease and desist orders. This investigation began based on complaints that specific models infringed issued patents and has been extended with a new target completion date of February 13, 2025.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Wilson Electronics LLC, alleging violations of the Tariff Act related to the importation and sale of certain cellular signal boosters and related components due to patent infringements. The Commission is investigating whether these products infringe on several patents and if a U.S. industry is affected. The investigation will involve specific companies, including Cellphone-Mate, Inc. and Shenzhen SureCall Communication Technology Co., Ltd. If the allegations are confirmed, the Commission may impose a limited exclusion order and issue cease and desist orders against the respondents.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Aardvark Medical Inc. alleging that several companies are importing and selling nasal devices that violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint requests actions like exclusion orders and cease and desist orders against these companies. The Commission is inviting public comments on the impact these actions could have on American public health, welfare, competitive conditions, and consumers. Comments must be submitted electronically within eight days of this notice's publication.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 concerning the importation and sale of certain power converter modules and computing systems. It has issued two types of orders: a limited exclusion order to prevent unlicensed products from entering the U.S. and cease and desist orders against specific companies. This decision followed an investigation initiated due to a complaint from Vicor Corporation, with the Commission determining a breach regarding the '481 and '761 patents, while finding no violation for the '950 patent. The public interest factors did not stop these orders, and the investigation has now ended.