Search Results for keywords:"antidumping duty orders"

The Department of Commerce is issuing antidumping duty orders on forged steel fluid end blocks imported from Germany and Italy due to findings of unfair pricing that harm U.S. industries. The duties will apply to imports made on or after July 23, 2020, except for specific exemptions like shipments from Metalcam S.p.A. in Italy. The action comes after the International Trade Commission confirmed these imports are harming U.S. producers. Additionally, the final determination for Germany has been amended to correct a ministerial error affecting calculated dumping margins.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from eight countries: Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Turkey, and the UAE. This action is based on findings that these imported products were sold in the U.S. at less-than-fair-value (LTFV) and caused material injury to industries in the U.S. Antidumping duties will be collected on these imports, effective from September 30, 2020. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection will enforce these duties and require cash deposits for estimated duties to protect U.S. industries from unfair global competition.

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided that removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel racks and parts from China would likely result in unfair pricing and subsidies, harming U.S. industries. As a result, Commerce is continuing these orders, meaning U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting duties on these imports. These orders apply to steel racks and parts thereof, with specific exclusions and detailed scope described within the orders. The decision is effective from March 5, 2025, and compliance with protective measures regarding business information is required.

The Department of Commerce has completed its third sunset reviews on antidumping duty orders for carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India and China. It found that removing these orders would likely result in continued or renewed dumping, with potential dumping margins going up to 241.32% for China and 44.80% for India. The decision was made after Sun Chemical Corporation participated in the review, but no substantial responses were received from other parties. Commerce conducted expedited reviews because there were no substantive responses from respondent interested parties.

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping duty orders on sodium nitrite from Germany and China. This decision is based on findings that removing these orders could lead to dumping practices and harm U.S. industries. The notice confirms that U.S. Customs will keep collecting the duties for imports of sodium nitrite, and the orders will remain in effect as of February 5, 2025. The government plans to review these orders again in five years to determine if they should remain in place.

The Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. This decision is based on findings that removing these orders would likely result in the recurrence of dumping, government subsidies, and harm to the U.S. industry. The continuation of these orders means that additional duties will still be collected on these imports to protect U.S. businesses. This continuation is effective from January 4, 2021, and further reviews will be conducted in the future to assess the situation again.

The United States International Trade Commission has announced expedited reviews as required by the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing trade duties on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry in the near future. The reviews stem from a prior determination that responses from domestic parties were sufficient, but responses from respondents weren't. Interested parties can submit written comments with their views on the matter by January 14, 2021, though they must not include new factual information. The reviews have been deemed complex, allowing for a possible extension of the review period by up to 90 days.

The United States International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews to decide if lifting the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam could cause harm to U.S. industry. These reviews, scheduled under the Tariff Act of 1930, aim to assess potential negative consequences within a foreseeable time frame. The Commission has given specific dates for submitting comments related to these reviews and has outlined procedures for participation and document submission. This process allows interested parties to express their views on whether these trade protections should remain in place.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overturned previous decisions from the U.S. Court of International Trade regarding aluminum door thresholds from China. These thresholds, imported by Worldwide Door Components, Inc. and Columbia Aluminum Products, LLC, are now classified as subject to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. This decision means that the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue holding the thresholds until further instructions are given. Additionally, the cash deposit rates for these items will be determined by the rates applicable to similar products from China.

The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has announced expedited reviews of antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia. These reviews aim to determine if ending the orders would harm the U.S. industry by causing injury. The process includes publishing reports and allows interested parties to submit written comments. Due to the complexity of the case, the review period was extended by up to 90 days.