Search Results for keywords:"antidumping duty"

Found 189 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"antidumping duty"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8884
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction to its previous decision regarding the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. On January 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the original decision was incorrect, prompting Commerce to amend its results. Despite this change, the revised antidumping duty margin for the company Venus Wire Industries remains above the minimum threshold, meaning they will stay included in the antidumping duty order. Commerce will not issue new cash deposit instructions as Venus had already been subjected to another review that established a new rate.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government changed its mind about some rules for selling a special kind of steel from India to the U.S. because the court said the first decision was not right. But one company's steel still costs extra when sold to the U.S. because of an older rule.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11512
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary determination that producers and exporters of hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine) from India are receiving subsidies that can be countervailed. This investigation covers the period from April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024, with parties invited to comment on the findings. The investigation aligns the final decision on countervailing duties with a separate investigation into whether hexamine is sold at unfairly low prices in the U.S., expected by July 14, 2025. The Department determined a preliminary subsidy rate for the main Indian producer, Kanoria Chemicals, which affects other non-examined companies as well.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government thinks that a special ingredient from India used in making things like medicine and fuels, called hexamine, is getting unfair help from its home country, making it cheaper and less fair for competitors in America; they are checking this out to see if they need to add extra taxes on it to make it fair for everyone.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11793
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The United States International Trade Commission has decided not to revoke the antidumping duty order on certain crepe paper products from China. This decision was made because, based on their review, removing the order would likely cause harm to related industries in the United States. The review was part of a regular five-year assessment, officially filed on February 22, 2021. The findings and detailed views of the Commission are documented in USITC Publication 5163.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government has decided to keep special rules to make sure crepe paper from China is sold at fair prices, because if they remove these rules, it might hurt businesses in America.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 2022
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission decided that if they remove tariffs on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from China, it could harm the U.S. industry. This conclusion is based on a five-year review and was finalized on January 3, 2025. The review process started in June 2024 and was expedited in September 2024. Two commissioners did not participate in this decision.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States Trade Commission checked if taking away tariffs, which are special taxes, on certain pipe parts from China might hurt U.S. businesses and decided that removing them could be bad. Two people who usually help make these decisions weren't involved, but we don't know why.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 12123
    Reading Time:about 15 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary decision determining that producers and exporters of thermoformed molded fiber products from China receive governmental subsidies. This investigation covers the entire year of 2023, and interested parties are encouraged to provide feedback on this determination. The final decision regarding these subsidies is set to be released by July 21, 2025, and during this investigation, Commerce plans to verify its findings. Additionally, certain companies have not cooperated fully with the investigation, leading to adverse assumptions about them being made by the Commerce Department.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government thinks that some companies in China are getting help from their government to make special products from paper in a cheaper way, and they are looking into this to decide if they should charge extra fees. People are invited to share their thoughts on this situation before the final decision next year.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 95743
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has received scope ruling applications related to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These applications request clarifications on whether specific products fall under existing trade regulations. The document notifies the public about these applications filed in October 2024, including details such as product descriptions, countries of production, and applicants' names. Interested parties can find more information and participate in the proceedings through the Commerce Department's online systems.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government is trying to figure out if some products, like special metal parts, need to follow certain rules that help fair trade between countries. They want to let everyone know that they are checking into this and that people can look online to see all the details.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 6871
    Reading Time:about 14 minutes

    The Department of Commerce has announced preliminary results regarding the sale of cold-rolled steel flat products from South Korea. They found that Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO/POSCO International Corporation did not sell these products at unfairly low prices in the U.S. between September 2018 and August 2019. The review still involves Hyundai, POSCO/PIC, and KG Dongbu Steel, and the Commerce Department is inviting comments on these preliminary findings. The decisions and comments will later influence the final assessments of duties and responsibilities for companies involved in this trade.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government checked if two Korean companies sold steel at very low prices in America to be unfair. They found that these companies didn't do that, and now people can share what they think about these findings.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 99830
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce reviewed the sales practices of OCTAL SAOC FZC, a producer/exporter from Oman, for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin during a specific period and found that they did not sell the product at less than normal value. As a result, OCTAL will not be subject to antidumping duties. The Department has also updated procedures for assessment and cash deposit requirements, maintaining a zero percent cash deposit rate for OCTAL and the standard rate for others if applicable. Importers must be aware of their responsibilities regarding antidumping duties to avoid extra charges.

    Simple Explanation

    In a review, the U.S. Department of Commerce found that a company called OCTAL from Oman sold plastic resin fairly, so they don't have to pay extra fees called antidumping duties. This means OCTAL can keep selling their product in the U.S. without any penalty, and companies buying from them won't have to pay extra either.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7737
    Reading Time:about 16 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission has started a review to decide if removing the antidumping duty on ironing tables and related parts from China would harm the U.S. industry. They are asking interested parties to provide information and feedback by specific deadlines. The review follows previous continuations of the duty order in 2010 and 2016, aiming to evaluate whether the domestic industry would face injury if the order is revoked. Anyone wishing to participate must submit the required information electronically and follow specific procedures outlined by the Commission.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is checking if stopping a special tax on ironing tables from China will hurt businesses here, and they want people to share what they think about it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11623
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission announced that it is conducting expedited reviews to determine if removing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rods from China, India, Taiwan, and Thailand would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry. The Commission has decided to carry out these reviews quickly, as the domestic party response was deemed adequate while the foreign party response was not. Interested parties can submit written comments, but they must adhere to specific guidelines and deadlines. Due to the complexity of these reviews, the Commission may extend the review period by up to 90 days.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission wants to check quickly if stopping special taxes on steel rods from some countries would hurt American businesses, because not many people from outside the U.S. wanted to talk about it.