Search Results for keywords:"Clean Water Act"

Found 66 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Clean Water Act"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 1116
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The Yuba County Water Agency has submitted an application for a water quality certification to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the California State Water Resources Control Board. The submission was acknowledged on December 30, 2024. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, the Water Board has until December 30, 2025, to act on the certification request. If the Water Board does not take action by then, the authority to certify is considered waived under the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The Yuba County Water Agency wants to make sure the water in a certain area is clean, so they asked two groups if it meets all the rules. These groups have one year to decide, and if they don't, they won't get another chance to say yes or no.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 105567
    Reading Time:about 12 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking comments on its draft analyses comparing two sets of protective values for aquatic life affected by pesticides. These values are developed under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA). The agency's findings suggest that the values from both legal frameworks are similarly effective in protecting aquatic life. The EPA is considering adopting the benchmarks from the Office of Pesticides Programs (OPP) as national water quality recommendations, with public comments due by January 27, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to hear what people think about two ways to keep water animals safe from stuff in pesticides. They found out both ways work well, and they might use one set of rules for everyone to follow.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 96524
    Reading Time:about 42 minutes

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has finalized a rule clarifying timelines and requirements for water quality certifications under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act related to hydroelectric projects. This rule specifies that certifying authorities have one year to act on certification requests and affirms that projects discharging into U.S. waters need such certification or a waiver. The regulation updates language for consistency with Environmental Protection Agency terms and sets a timeline for filing certification requests. Changes include revising when certain certifications are required and ensuring procedural alignment with existing federal laws, aiming to enhance clarity, efficiency, and consistency in related hydroelectric proceedings.

    Simple Explanation

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission made a new rule that says if someone wants to build or change a dam and it might let dirty water into rivers or lakes, they have one year to check and make sure the water stays clean. They updated some words to match other rules and changed the timing for when people have to ask permission, so everything works nicely together.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 107131
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has issued a notice regarding the water quality certification for three hydroelectric projects in New Hampshire. These projects are operated by Briar Hydro Associates, LLC and include the Rolfe Canal, Penacook Upper Falls, and Penacook Lower Falls Hydroelectric Projects. The notice states that the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services received requests for water quality certification on November 4, 2024, and has one year to act, until November 4, 2025. If the department does not respond by this date, the certification is considered waived under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge of checking if the water is clean enough for fish and plants in New Hampshire were told they have until next year to decide if three dams can keep going without hurting the water. If they don't decide by then, it's like saying "yes" by default.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 14135
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    On March 17, 2025, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) received a request from the New York Power Authority for water quality certification related to a project. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has notified the New York DEC that it has one year, until March 17, 2026, to act on this certification request. If the DEC fails to make a decision by that date, the requirement for certification is considered waived according to the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The New York Power Authority has asked the New York State agency in charge of the environment for a special permission called "water quality certification" for their project. This agency has until March 17, 2026, to decide, or else they might lose the chance to say yes or no.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 16125
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is planning to renew a permit that allows treated wastewater to be discharged from bulk fuel storage facilities located in Guam. This proposed permit, identified as Permit No. GUG000001, will be valid for five years and is currently open for public comments. People can submit their comments until May 19, 2025. The permit aims to manage resources efficiently while maintaining consistent conditions for similar facilities, and more information can be found on the EPA Region 9 website.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to give permission to some places in Guam that store big amounts of fuel to safely let out their cleaned water. They are asking everyone to share their thoughts on this idea before they decide.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7108
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice has announced a proposed agreement, known as a Consent Decree, in a court case against Thomas E. Lipar and several companies. The case involves complaint under the Clean Water Act, where pollutants were allegedly discharged without a permit. The proposed Decree requires the defendants to perform environmental mitigation and adhere to certain practices to prevent further violations. The public can submit comments on this proposal for 30 days, and more details can be found on the Justice Department's website or at the Clerk's Office of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

    Simple Explanation

    The Justice Department made a plan with a person and some companies who did something wrong with water rules. They need to fix their mistakes, and people can tell the government what they think about this plan for 30 days.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8048
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice has filed a proposed update to the 2006 Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. This case involves the United States and the State of Connecticut seeking action against the Metropolitan District of Hartford for violations of the Clean Water Act. The modification extends the deadline for removing certain sewage overflow points and sets a new plan for reducing water infiltration into the sewer system. Public comments on this proposal are open for thirty days, and the decree can be accessed online or by requesting assistance.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge of making sure our water is clean want to change some rules they set a long time ago. They're giving more time to fix places where dirty water could spill and are planning better ways to keep rainwater out of the sewers. People can share their thoughts on these changes, and everyone can read or ask about it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7109
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Department of Justice has lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the court to settle claims against American Zinc Recycling Corp. for environmental law violations at their facility in Palmerton, Pennsylvania. These claims involve federal laws such as the Clean Air Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Clean Water Act, and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, along with several Pennsylvania state laws. Under the Consent Decree, the company must implement new pollution control measures and pay a $3.3 million penalty, split between the U.S. and Pennsylvania. There is a public comment period on the Consent Decree, during which the document can be reviewed online or requested by mail.

    Simple Explanation

    The Justice Department wants a company that broke the rules about keeping the air, water, and ground clean to fix things and pay money, and people have a chance to say what they think about it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 1960
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the availability of the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 14 under the Clean Water Act. This plan outlines updates on previous activities, reviews of wastewater discharges, and proposed treatment technologies. The plan also addresses new studies, such as those related to industrial discharges of nutrients and PFAS (a group of chemicals). EPA received public feedback on the preliminary plan and made some clarifications, although no significant changes were made. The plan is available online for public access.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a plan to help keep water clean by checking what factories dump in the water and by looking into ways to make the water cleaner. They listened to what people thought about their first plan and made it clearer, but they didn't change much.