Search Results for keywords:"EPA"

Found 291 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"EPA"

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 8566
    Reading Time:about 13 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes approving New Hampshire's updated sulfur content standards for fuels, replacing older regulations. This revision, submitted on March 11, 2019, aims to lower sulfur limits in liquid and solid fuels, improving air quality and aligning with state law changes. Notably, the regulation allows temporary deferrals of sulfur limits during fuel shortages, provided conditions are met, and requires EPA notification. Public comments on the proposal are invited until March 10, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to change how much sulfur is allowed in fuels in New Hampshire to help clean the air. This means less stinky stuff in the air but sometimes, if there's not enough fuel, they might let it slide a little.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 101
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to submit a revised Information Collection Request (ICR) for four grant programs under its Transportation and Climate Division (TCD). These programs, which include the Diesel Emission Reduction Act (DERA), Clean School Bus (CSB), Clean Heavy Duty Vehicles (CHDV), and Clean Ports Grant Programs, aim to reduce mobile source emissions. The EPA is seeking public comments on this ICR revision, which introduces new reporting templates to improve data collection. The revisions are expected to decrease the time and cost burden on respondents. Comments are due by March 3, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to update some forms to make it easier and cheaper for people and groups to apply for grants that help reduce pollution from big trucks, school buses, and ports. They are asking people what they think about these changes before they finalize them.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 11025
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is updating certain regulations for a facility in Baytown, Texas originally owned by Bayer Material Science LLC, which is now owned by Covestro LLC. This update reflects changes in the facility's ownership and name while maintaining the existing waste exclusion rules. The change will be officially effective on March 3, 2025, without a need for a public comment period because the facility will continue to comply with previous requirements. The amendments involve updating certain tables in the hazardous waste regulations to reflect the new ownership.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is updating its records to say that a factory in Texas was once owned by one company but is now owned by another. They are just changing the names in their files, and nothing else is changing.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 87
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a proposed Settlement Agreement concerning challenges by the State of Wyoming and PacifiCorp related to the EPA's ruling on Wyoming’s Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP). In 2014, both parties filed reviews against EPA's final rule, which partially disapproved the SIP's elements and created a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to cover these gaps. The proposed agreement aims to resolve disputes over nitrogen oxide requirements at PacifiCorp's Wyodak unit, with specific actions outlined if the agreement is accepted. The EPA is seeking public comments on this proposed agreement until February 3, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA and the State of Wyoming, along with a company called PacifiCorp, are trying to settle a disagreement about how clean the air should be around a power plant. They're asking people to share their thoughts on the plan before they finish it.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 6967
    Reading Time:about 39 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed updates to the Clean Water Act methods for analyzing pollutants in effluent. This rule aims to improve data quality and consistency by introducing new methods for detecting specific substances like PFAS and PCB congeners, while withdrawing outdated testing parameters and methods. Additionally, the proposal includes simplifying certain sampling requirements and making minor corrections to existing tables of approved methods. Public comments on this proposal are invited until February 20, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure the water we use is super clean by checking for some bad stuff like PFAS and PCB, and they want to update how they test for these. They also want to make some parts of this process easier and fix some small mistakes.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 103734
    Reading Time:about 18 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to disapprove parts of a plan by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to manage air quality fees in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria area. This plan was meant to address a rule requiring fees for emitting too much ozone. The EPA says the proposed plan doesn't meet the rule's requirements since it allows ending the fee program too soon without redesignating the area as having good air quality. Even if disapproved, Texas does not need to fix these plan parts due to other rule changes that ended the requirement for the fee program.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to say "no" to part of Texas's plan to fix air pollution fees in one area because the plan lets them stop charging too soon. But, Texas doesn't have to change it since the fee rule doesn't apply anymore.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8792
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced that it has received applications to register new uses for pesticides that already have registered active ingredients. This action is under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and the EPA is inviting public comments on these applications until March 11, 2021. Interested parties, like agricultural producers and food manufacturers, can find specific instructions on how to submit their comments through various methods provided by the EPA. This announcement does not represent a final decision but informs the public of the applications received and invites input.

    Simple Explanation

    The people at the EPA want to know what everyone thinks about some new ways to use bug-fighting chemicals. They have a special rule to see if these ways are safe, and they want people to share their thoughts by March 11, 2021.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 2682
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the availability of its proposed registration review decision for the pesticide ancymidol, initiating a 60-day period for public comments. According to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticide registrations are reviewed every 15 years to ensure safety standards are met. The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed decisions for ancymidol by March 14, 2025, using the methods specified by the EPA. This notice aims to gather input from diverse stakeholders, including environmental and agricultural advocates, to aid in potential updates to the proposed decision.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is checking to make sure a chemical called ancymidol is still safe to use, and they want to hear what people think about it by March 14, 2025. They hope that scientists, farmers, and others will help them make a good decision.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 9334
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    On December 1, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decided that the Kalispel Tribe in northeastern Washington can be treated like a state for certain non-regulatory parts of the Clean Air Act. This means they can access specific grants and participate in interstate air quality management without regulatory power. The EPA reviewed and approved the tribe's request, confirming that their jurisdiction covers their original reservation boundaries. Anyone wishing to challenge this decision in court has 60 days to file an appeal.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA decided that the Kalispel Tribe can join other states in some air quality projects and get special grants, but they won't make any new rules themselves. This doesn't mean they are a state, just that they can participate in certain activities like one.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 5693
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved a change to the Washington State Implementation Plan, removing a ban on small recreational fires in Thurston County. This ban, which was mistakenly added in 2013, covered fires using seasoned firewood or charcoal, commonly seen in backyards and campfires. The EPA confirmed that removing the ban won't harm air quality in the area. This update allows recreational fires in specific cities and surrounding areas within Thurston County, effective February 18, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA said it's okay for people in a part of Washington to have small campfires again, because it won't make the air dirty, starting in February 2025.