Search Results for keywords:"Environmental Protection Agency"

Found 393 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Environmental Protection Agency"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 101007
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to renew the information collection for the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) related to polymeric coating at supporting substrates facilities, extending its approval until December 31, 2024, under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This notice was published to allow an additional 30 days for public comments. The rules apply to 74 facilities, requiring responses initially, quarterly, and semiannually, with an estimated total burden of 16,400 hours and a cost of $3,330,000 annually. No changes in the regulations or burden are anticipated in the next three years.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency wants to renew rules for factories that make shiny coatings, and people have 30 more days to tell them what they think about it. These rules make sure 74 places check their work and tell the EPA every few months, and this takes many hours and costs a lot of money.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 103819
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the Piti-Cabras area in Guam did not meet the required sulfur dioxide air quality standards by the deadline of April 9, 2023. This decision is based on the analysis of available data, showing emissions were too high, and necessary emission controls were not implemented on time. As a result, Guam must now submit a revised plan to achieve air quality standards within the next five years, according to the Clean Air Act requirements. This measure ensures continued efforts to protect public health from pollution.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA says that the air in a place called Piti-Cabras, Guam, still has too much bad stuff called sulfur dioxide, which can be harmful. They need to make a better plan to clean the air in the next five years.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1040
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a correction to a previously published rule regarding the classification of major and area sources of air pollution under the Clean Air Act. This correction fixes a typographical error in the regulatory text, changing an incorrect reference to a specific regulation with the correct reference. The correction ensures clarity and consistency in the rule without changing its original intent or imposing new requirements. The rule is effective immediately to prevent confusion, as the public had already been informed of the content through earlier notices.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA fixed a mistake in its rules about air pollution that was like spelling a word wrong, and they wanted to make sure everyone knows about the change right away so there’s no confusion.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 9041
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve parts of a plan from Texas that ensures areas not meeting federal ozone standards are properly managing new pollution sources and emissions reporting. These areas include Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, and Bexar County. The plan submission meets the requirements under the Clean Air Act for managing new sources of pollution and ensuring detailed emissions reports are provided annually. Public comments on this proposal are invited until March 15, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure Texas is following rules to keep the air clean in big cities like Dallas and Houston. They're checking that Texas has a good plan to control smoke from new factories and reports how much pollution is in the air every year.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 10876
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reopening the public comment period for a rule proposed on August 30, 2024, regarding Ohio's Regional Haze Plan under the Clean Air Act. The reopening lets people comment on specific permit conditions related to emissions at certain power plants in Ohio. This period, lasting 15 days, allows further input after some documents were initially unavailable. Comments must be submitted by March 17, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to hear what people think again about certain rules for cleaning the air around three power plants in Ohio. They've opened up a short time to give everyone a chance to say what they think because some important details were not ready before.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 5798
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the deadline for public comments related to the potential risks of certain chemicals, specifically N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-Nβ€²-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD) and its transformation product, 6PPD-quinone. Originally, comments were due by January 21, 2025, but the deadline has been moved to March 24, 2025, to give stakeholders more time to provide valuable input. The extension comes in response to requests for more time to prepare comments about regulatory options and potential alternatives under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Anyone interested can submit their comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is letting people take more time, until March 24, 2025, to share their thoughts on whether a chemical called 6PPD and something it turns into, 6PPD-quinone, might be harmful and what can be done about it.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 8699
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved a statement from Maryland's state government, declaring that there are no Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units in Maryland. This approval follows the Clean Air Act guidelines, which require states to manage emissions from such units. Maryland certified in April 2020 that no SSI units exist within its borders, which means they do not need to submit a detailed plan for controlling emissions from them. This rule is effective as of March 11, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA said that Maryland doesn't have any special machines that burn sewage waste to get rid of it, so Maryland doesn't need a plan to control smoke from those machines.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 95117
    Reading Time:about 24 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final decision to partially approve and partially disapprove Utah's plan to address regional haze, which affects air quality in national parks and wilderness areas. The EPA found Utah's plan partially insufficient as it failed to meet certain requirements, such as implementing stronger controls on emissions from specific power plants. Additionally, the EPA disapproved parts of Utah's plan addressing visibility pollution related to ozone levels from a 2020 submission. This ruling emphasizes the need for stronger measures to protect visibility and air quality in protected areas.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is like a referee for clean air, and they looked at Utah’s plan to keep the air clear in parks. They said some parts of Utah’s plan are good, but some parts need to be better, like stopping smoke from big factories so everyone can enjoy nice, clean air.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 104059
    Reading Time:about 12 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a final rule updating the materials incorporated by reference into the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) to align with federal air quality standards. This update includes various changes to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) tables, clarifying and revising several regulation explanations. The updates are effective from December 20, 2024, and affect how these materials can be accessed by the public at specified locations. EPA emphasized that this action is an administrative change that codifies existing state and federal regulations, and does not impose new regulatory impacts.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has decided to update a set of rules to make sure that Georgia follows the right air quality standards. They are changing some old numbers and letters in their big rule book, but these changes won't create any new rules for people to follow.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 971
    Reading Time:about 20 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a rule concerning air quality in Maricopa County, Arizona. The rule partially approves, partially disapproves, and partially conditionally approves revisions to the air quality plan for the area, focusing on controlling emissions to meet 2008 ozone standards. The EPA is conditionally approving certain rules for controlling emissions from surface coating operations, while requiring updates for others within a year, or they will face disapproval. No comments were received during the public comment period, and failure to meet these conditions might result in federal sanctions.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made some changes to the air quality plan in Maricopa County to help clean up the air, but they want more improvements within a year to stop certain pollutants. If the county doesn't make these improvements, they could get in trouble with the government.