Search Results for keywords:"unreasonable risk"

Found 12 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"unreasonable risk"

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3107
    Reading Time:about 119 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address health risks associated with the chemical C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29). This rule focuses on minimizing inhalation risks by requiring the use of protective gear and regular cleaning in workplaces that handle PV29 in its dry powder form. The EPA has also proposed to implement recordkeeping and labeling requirements to ensure compliance and communication throughout the supply chain. Public comments are being requested to help refine the proposal and ensure its effectiveness in protecting workers' health.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure people who work with a special purple color powder called PV29 wear the right safety gear so it's not bad for their health. They also want everyone involved with this powder to keep good records and follow clear rules about how to handle it safely.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 1495
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released its final risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This evaluation is used to determine if the chemical poses an unreasonable risk to health or the environment, considering its various uses. The EPA found that some uses of 1,4-dioxane do pose such a risk, necessitating regulatory action to manage these risks, while other uses do not. The evaluation and related documents are available for public access.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA checked if a chemical called 1,4-dioxane is too dangerous for people or nature and found that some ways it’s used are risky and need rules to make them safer, while other ways are okay.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 11142
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a regulation to address the health risks associated with a chemical called C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29), as part of their assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Initially, the comment period for this proposal was scheduled to end on February 28, 2025, but it has now been extended by 60 days, giving the public until April 29, 2025, to submit their feedback. The purpose of this extension is to allow stakeholders more time to review the materials and provide their comments. To participate, the public can submit comments online at regulations.gov and should refer to the ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0277.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is asking people to share their thoughts on a special purple color (PV29) to make sure it's safe to use. They've given everyone a bit more time, until April 29, 2025, to do so.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 3828
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final risk evaluation for diisononyl phthalate (DINP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The evaluation found that DINP poses an unreasonable risk to human health, particularly due to non-cancer effects like developmental toxicity and liver effects in female workers of reproductive age and other workers exposed to it. The EPA plans to take risk management actions to address these concerns. This includes looking at conditions where exposure to DINP through products like spray adhesives, sealants, and paints may contribute to these health risks.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA looked at a chemical named DINP and found that it can hurt people’s health, especially their bodies, when they come in contact with certain products like glue and paint. Now, the EPA will create new rules to keep everyone safe around this chemical.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8628
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published a notice regarding its findings on new chemical substances and significant new uses under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This notice, covering the period from August 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019, states that these substances are not likely to pose an unreasonable risk to health or the environment. The decision involves premanufacture notices (PMNs), microbial commercial activity notices (MCANs), and significant new use notices (SNUNs). Additional information and the EPA's detailed reasoning can be found in the Federal Register or by contacting the EPA directly.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) checked some new chemicals to make sure they're safe, and they think these chemicals won't hurt people or nature. They wrote down what they found and shared it with everyone so that people know these new things are okay to use.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 638
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the final risk evaluation for diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The EPA has found that DIDP presents an unreasonable risk to human health, particularly to female workers of reproductive age, due to non-cancer effects like reduced offspring survival linked to inhalation exposure. The EPA will propose regulatory actions to manage these risks, focusing on preventing high exposure levels in certain work scenarios. This review and the ensuing actions are guided by TSCA's requirement to use the best available science to ensure chemical safety.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA found that a chemical called DIDP can be harmful to people, especially women who are expecting a baby, and they plan to make rules to help keep everyone safe.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 6322
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final risk evaluation for the chemical C.I. Pigment Violet 29, used in various products like paints and inks. This evaluation checks if the chemical poses any unreasonable risks to health or the environment under certain conditions of use. The EPA found some uses of the chemical do pose unreasonable risks, and they plan to address these through management measures. Information and related documents are available on the EPA's website.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has checked if a chemical named C.I. Pigment Violet 29, found in things like paints, is harmful to people or nature. They found that some uses are not safe, so they plan to fix those.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 1125
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on a draft risk evaluation for Dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This evaluation aims to determine if DCHP poses an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, focusing only on risk factors and not on costs. The draft suggests that DCHP presents a risk, particularly in occupational settings, while consumer and general population risks are not significantly concerning. Public comments are invited until March 10, 2025, and feedback will be considered before finalizing the evaluation.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is asking people to share their thoughts on whether a chemical called DCHP is dangerous to humans, especially those at work. They want feedback from everyone by March 10, 2025, to help them decide.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 89
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released the final risk evaluation for Chrysotile Asbestos under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The evaluation identifies certain uses of this type of asbestos as posing an unreasonable risk to health, prompting the EPA to implement risk management measures. Other uses were found not to pose such risks. Additionally, the EPA is working on Part 2 of the risk evaluation, which will address legacy uses and disposals of all types of asbestos, with a draft scope expected for public comment in mid-2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA checked if a type of asbestos called Chrysotile is dangerous to people or the planet. They found that some uses are unsafe, so they plan to make rules to fix it. They're also working on another study to check old uses of asbestos.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10489
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a notice about certain statements of findings they made under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Specifically, this involves determinations from the EPA that certain new chemicals or new uses of existing chemicals do not pose significant risks to health or the environment. These findings cover submissions made between September 1 and December 31, 2024. The public can access more detailed information on these decisions and submit comments through the EPA's online docket system.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA checked new chemicals to make sure they're safe for people and nature. They said some new chemicals and new uses of old ones are okay because they don't think they'll cause harm.

123 Next