Search Results for keywords:"cease and desist orders"

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from SkyBell Technologies, SB IP Holdings, and Eyetalk365, alleging that various companies violated trade rules by selling certain IP camera systems and video doorbells that infringe on several U.S. patents. They claim this is happening both through imports into the U.S. and sales inside the country. The complaint asks for an investigation and aims for an exclusion order and cease and desist orders against the companies involved. An investigation has been ordered to determine if these allegations are true, with responses from the accused companies needed within 20 days of being served the complaint.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that NJOY, a company involved in the importation and sale of vaporizer devices, has violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by infringing on several JUUL Labs patents. As a result, the Commission issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting the import of NJOY's infringing products and cease and desist orders against NJOY. No bond will be required for the importation of excluded articles during the period of Presidential review. This decision was made after a thorough investigation, and the Commission's findings were communicated to the President and the U.S. Trade Representative.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Optimum Communications Services, Inc. regarding the alleged illegal importation of certain passive optical network equipment from several Chinese companies. The complaint claims that these imports violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission is asking for public comments on whether the requested actions, such as exclusion and cease and desist orders, would impact public health, the U.S. economy, or consumers. Interested parties must submit their written comments electronically within eight calendar days of the notice's publication.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 concerning the importation and sale of certain power converter modules and computing systems. It has issued two types of orders: a limited exclusion order to prevent unlicensed products from entering the U.S. and cease and desist orders against specific companies. This decision followed an investigation initiated due to a complaint from Vicor Corporation, with the Commission determining a breach regarding the '481 and '761 patents, while finding no violation for the '950 patent. The public interest factors did not stop these orders, and the investigation has now ended.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Syensqo SA, Solvay Specialty Polymers USA LLC, and Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A., alleging violations related to the importation and sale of certain polyvinylidene fluoride resins. The complaint names several Chinese companies as respondents and requests various legal actions including exclusion orders and cease and desist orders. The Commission is asking for public comments on how these requested actions might affect public health and welfare, U.S. economy conditions, and consumers. The public has until eight days after the notice's publication in the Federal Register to submit their comments.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) has received a complaint from Samsung Electronics alleging violations in the importation and sale of certain wireless communications equipment. The complaint names Ericsson's Swedish and American entities as respondents and requests exclusion orders and cease and desist orders against them. The ITC is seeking public comments on whether the requested actions could impact public health, safety, or the U.S. economy. Comments must be submitted within eight days of the notice's publication in the Federal Register.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Wilson Electronics LLC, alleging violations of the Tariff Act related to the importation and sale of certain cellular signal boosters and related components due to patent infringements. The Commission is investigating whether these products infringe on several patents and if a U.S. industry is affected. The investigation will involve specific companies, including Cellphone-Mate, Inc. and Shenzhen SureCall Communication Technology Co., Ltd. If the allegations are confirmed, the Commission may impose a limited exclusion order and issue cease and desist orders against the respondents.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Aardvark Medical Inc. alleging that several companies are importing and selling nasal devices that violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint requests actions like exclusion orders and cease and desist orders against these companies. The Commission is inviting public comments on the impact these actions could have on American public health, welfare, competitive conditions, and consumers. Comments must be submitted electronically within eight days of this notice's publication.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is reviewing a case involving alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act, which concerns icemaking machines and the infringement of certain patents owned by Hoshizaki America, Inc. The Commission is seeking written input from involved parties and interested stakeholders on specific legal and technical questions regarding patent equivalence and remedies like exclusion orders or cease and desist orders. This investigation began based on complaints that specific models infringed issued patents and has been extended with a new target completion date of February 13, 2025.

The U.S. International Trade Commission found that certain icemaking machines and components from Bluenix Co., Ltd. infringe on specific U.S. patents held by Hoshizaki America, Inc. As a result, the Commission issued orders to stop these products from being imported into the U.S. and imposed a bond of 49% of the product's value during a review period. This decision follows a series of investigations and reviews confirming the patent violation.