Search Results for keywords:"U.S. Court of International Trade"

On November 26, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade declared part of a previous decision about the antidumping duties on tires from China was incorrect. This decision affects the duties assigned to Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd. The Department of Commerce must now adjust the final results for Kenda's duties, but their current cash deposit rate will not change. The department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to calculate final duties owed on relevant Kenda tire imports.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction to its previous decision regarding the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. On January 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the original decision was incorrect, prompting Commerce to amend its results. Despite this change, the revised antidumping duty margin for the company Venus Wire Industries remains above the minimum threshold, meaning they will stay included in the antidumping duty order. Commerce will not issue new cash deposit instructions as Venus had already been subjected to another review that established a new rate.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the previous determination by the Department of Commerce regarding unfair pricing of wind towers from Spain was incorrect. Consequently, the Department of Commerce has adjusted the final determination and modified the antidumping duty order, changing the dumping margins for Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) and its affiliates. This decision also affects other producers and exporters as new cash deposit instructions will be sent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The changes were published on February 11, 2025, following a series of legal developments and court decisions.

The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the Department of Commerce's final decision regarding certain superabsorbent polymers from Korea, covering the period from October 2020 to September 2021. As a result, Commerce is changing the antidumping duty order, specifically altering the dumping margins for LG Chem, Ltd. and other producers and exporters of these polymers. This change follows a review of the commercial significance of various characteristics of the polymers, underlining the court's concerns about the initial findings. Commerce will update cash deposit instructions for these goods as these changes are implemented.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has made a decision that is not in line with the Department of Commerce's original findings regarding antidumping duties on welded line pipe from South Korea, specifically for the companies Hyundai Steel, SeAH Steel Corporation, and others. As a result, the Department of Commerce has recalculated and adjusted the dumping margins—the percentage that products are sold below fair market value—accordingly. The CIT's decision includes changes to how certain sales and costs were calculated in response to appeals and takes effect from January 14, 2021. This announcement ensures that future imports from these companies have the adjusted rates, pending any new legal challenges.

In a decision on January 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the U.S. Department of Commerce's initial findings in an investigation concerning Brazilian raw honey. The Department of Commerce had originally accused Supermel, a Brazilian honey producer, of providing unverifiable data, and had imposed heavy duties as a result. However, the court found Supermel's discrepancies minor and ordered the review of these duties. Following this ruling, Commerce adjusted the duty rates for Supermel and other producers, relying on verified data rather than their previous adverse determination.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overturned previous decisions from the U.S. Court of International Trade regarding aluminum door thresholds from China. These thresholds, imported by Worldwide Door Components, Inc. and Columbia Aluminum Products, LLC, are now classified as subject to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. This decision means that the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue holding the thresholds until further instructions are given. Additionally, the cash deposit rates for these items will be determined by the rates applicable to similar products from China.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on January 15, 2025, that Commerce's previous findings regarding antidumping duties on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Korea were incorrect. Following this, the Department of Commerce amended its results, affecting companies like Husteel and Hyundai, as well as others not individually examined. These adjustments, however, will not alter existing cash deposit rates due to subsequent reviews already being completed. The liquidation of entries remains suspended until any ongoing or future appeals are resolved.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a final judgment on January 17, 2025, regarding the countervailing duty (CVD) review of corrosion-resistant steel products from Korea, stating that it disagrees with the U.S. Department of Commerce's prior decision. Consequently, the Department of Commerce is amending its results concerning the subsidy rates for KG Dongbu Steel and related entities. Current cash deposit rates remain unchanged, and any entries from these companies during 2019 are still subject to an injunction until any appeals are resolved. If not appealed, the Department will instruct the assessment of CVDs accordingly.

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has decided that the U.S. Department of Commerce must amend its final determination regarding antidumping duties on refillable stainless steel kegs from China. This decision impacts three Chinese exporters by altering their dumping margins within the antidumping duty order. Commerce will adjust cash deposit instructions for these companies and notify the public of changes due to the CIT's ruling.