Search Results for keywords:"Countervailing Duty"

Found 28 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Countervailing Duty"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8267
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a correction to a notice previously published about the investigation into countervailing duties on vanillin from China. The document initially named the company involved in the investigation incorrectly. The corrected company name is Jiaxing Guihua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. This correction has been issued to ensure the investigation proceeds with the right information.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce made a mistake in a notice about a company from China that makes vanillin, mixing up the company's name. They've now fixed it so they can keep working on the investigation correctly.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7855
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration is giving interested parties an opportunity to request an administrative review of antidumping or countervailing duty orders, findings, or suspended investigations. Requests must be made by the last day of February 2021. If a market has conditions that affect production costs, certain adjustments may be made to the price calculations. The process involves providing detailed information about the producers or exporters involved, and reviews are determined based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Commerce is letting people ask for a review of certain trade rules that affect product prices from other countries. People need to ask by the end of February, but the process is tricky and might be hard without help.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 15436
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that the Government of Mexico and two selected companies, Azucarera San Jose De Abajo S.A. and Santa Rosalia de la Chontalpa, SA de CV, have complied with the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico during the review period of 2023. This agreement, which involves limitations on sugar exports from Mexico, has been functioning as intended according to the review conducted by Commerce. Public comments are invited, and interested parties can submit their feedback on the preliminary findings. The final results of this review are expected to be issued 120 days after the publication of this notice.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce checked if a promise made by Mexico to send less sugar to the U.S. was kept in 2023, and they said Mexico did a good job following the rules.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8181
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to rescind certain administrative reviews related to antidumping and countervailing duty orders due to the withdrawal of review requests by all parties involved. These administrative reviews, which were initially initiated as per requests during specific periods of review, will not proceed as all requests were withdrawn within the 90-day deadline. The Commerce Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection to assess duties based on existing deposits. Importers and parties involved should note their responsibility to provide certificates or handle proprietary information as required by law.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce decided to stop checking some special taxes on things brought into the country because everyone who wanted these checks changed their minds and said, "No thanks."

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9044
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) determined that ending the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on sodium nitrite from China and the antidumping duty order on sodium nitrite from Germany would likely harm the U.S. industry. The review began on July 1, 2024, and expedited determinations were made in October 2024, with final opinions filed on January 31, 2025. These decisions were based on the potential risk of material injury to U.S. businesses in a foreseeable future if the orders were revoked. Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein did not participate in the decision-making process.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided that if they stop special rules on a chemical called sodium nitrite coming from China and Germany, it might hurt businesses in the U.S., so they will keep those rules.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10083
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced a supplemental schedule for ongoing investigations into imports of melamine from India. This schedule follows the Department of Commerce's final affirmative determinations that melamine from India is subject to countervailing and antidumping duties. Interested parties must submit comments on these determinations by February 24, 2025, but cannot include new factual information, and submissions are limited to five pages. All documents related to these investigations must be filed electronically via the USITC's Electronic Document Information System, as no paper filings will be accepted.

    Simple Explanation

    The US is checking if a chemical from India, called melamine, is being sold too cheaply and unfairly in the country. They want to make sure that people who want to talk about this investigation send their thoughts in a special way online by February 24, 2025, without adding new information.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 106429
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    On December 18, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a decision that resulted in changes to the countervailing duty (CVD) rates for Risen Energy Co., Ltd., a producer from China involved in exporting crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells to the U.S. This decision overruled a previous finding by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding subsidies provided to Risen Energy, specifically removing a 5.46% rate related to the Export Buyer's Credit Program. The Department of Commerce is amending the final results of its administrative review to reflect this decision and will adjust cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection accordingly.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Court decided that a Chinese company, Risen Energy, should pay less in extra fees than first thought because they didn't use a special credit program. Now, the U.S. is changing how much money Risen Energy has to give when sending solar cells to the U.S.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 3995
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it is immediately ending its policy of issuing liquidation instructions for certain antidumping and countervailing duty cases 15 days after a final decision is published, if no statutory injunction is requested. This policy was initially put in place in 2002 to give Customs and Border Protection enough time to process these cases and avoid any automatic liquidations. The policy change applies only to goods not originating from Canada and Mexico, as they were already exempt from the 15-day rule.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce is stopping a rule where, after deciding on tax cases related to goods from other countries, they would wait 15 days before telling customs what to do, unless there's a special request not to. This rule change doesn't affect goods from Canada and Mexico.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 95180
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce completed its review and found that Kumar Industries in India received unfair financial assistance from the government, which helped it export glycine to the U.S. at a lower cost. As a result, the Department has decided on a countervailing duty rate, which means Kumar will have to pay extra taxes on their glycine imports to the U.S. to offset this advantage. The review covered the period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, and the results will be published in the Federal Register, being effective from December 2, 2024.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce found that a company in India, called Kumar Industries, got some help from their government, which made it cheaper to sell their product, glycine, in the U.S. To make it fair, the company will now have to pay extra money called a "duty" when they sell in the U.S.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 104206
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) announced the scheduling of the final phase of investigations into imports of ceramic tile from India. These investigations, under the Tariff Act of 1930, aim to determine if these imports, alleged to be subsidized and sold at unfairly low prices, are harming the U.S. ceramic tile industry. The investigations were initiated based on a petition from the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ceramic Tile, a group of American ceramic tile manufacturers. The USITC will conduct hearings and allow for written submissions from interested parties, with the aim of protecting local industry from unfair international trade practices.

    Simple Explanation

    The US government is checking if tiles from India are being sold in America for super cheap prices because of unfair help from India's government, which might be hurting tile makers in the US. They're having meetings and collecting opinions to decide if they need to make rules to help American tile companies.

123 Next