Search Results for keywords:"Clean Water Act"

Found 66 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Clean Water Act"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 3859
    Reading Time:about 28 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a draft risk assessment regarding the presence of harmful chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, in sewage sludge for public comment. This risk assessment examines the potential risks to human health and the environment when the sludge is used as a soil conditioner, disposed of on the surface, or incinerated. The EPA highlights concerns for those living near these sites and using the products grown or raised there. The public can submit comments until March 17, 2025, which will help the EPA finalize the risk assessment and consider potential regulatory actions.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to know what people think about their plan to figure out if certain chemicals, found in poop used to help plants grow or burned, might be dangerous. They're asking people to share their thoughts by March 17, 2025, so they can decide what to do next.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 636
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The Turlock & Modesto Irrigation District applied for a water quality certification with the California State Water Resources Control Board, as part of a project involving the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The application was submitted and received on December 13, 2024. The Water Board has until December 13, 2025, to make a decision on the request. If the Water Board does not act by this date, their certification authority may be considered waived under the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The Turlock & Modesto Irrigation District wants permission to make sure their water project does not hurt the environment, and they have asked the California Water Board to decide by next year. If the board doesn't respond in time, they might not have a say anymore.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11966
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a notice denying a petition to overturn a Consent Agreement and Proposed Final Order involving the Frederick-Winchester Service Authority and Frederick County Sanitation Authority. This decision was made after reviewing a petition that claimed false statements were made regarding economic benefits and pollution control practices by the respondents. The EPA determined that these statements were not materially false and did not warrant setting aside the order or holding a hearing. The case details, including the order, are accessible online for public review.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA decided not to change an agreement about fixing water pollution problems, even though some people said the first plans were based on mistakes. They looked into the complaints and found everything was okay, so the original plans will stay the same.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 4068
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) concerning the Clean Water Act Section 404 State-Assumed Programs. This request, aimed at extending a currently approved information collection, allows states and tribes to manage their own permit programs for certain water discharges. The EPA seeks public comments on the necessity and accuracy of this proposed information gathering, which involves significant hours of work for applicants and states. The total estimated cost for the programs is over $5 million, and the collected information will be available for public review.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to hear from people about their plans to let states manage certain water permits, which means states could take care of some water cleanup. They just want to make sure it's a good idea and it doesn't cost too much time or money.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 12036
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice has lodged a proposed Consent Decree concerning a case where the United States accused Thomas E. Lipar and associated companies of violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit. To settle these allegations, the defendants are required to perform compensatory environmental mitigation and adhere to best management practices. The public had initially been given until February 25, 2021, to comment on this proposed agreement, but the deadline was extended to March 11, 2021. The details of the Consent Decree can be reviewed online or at the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, although access may be restricted due to COVID-19.

    Simple Explanation

    The Justice Department is talking about a plan where some companies, who did something wrong by polluting the water, have to fix their mistake by doing good things for the environment instead. People had more time to say what they think about this plan, but it's not clear what might happen if the companies don't follow the rules.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 1117
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    On December 16, 2024, the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy notified the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) about receiving a water quality certification request from Northern States Power Company for a project. According to the Clean Water Act, Michigan EGLE has until December 6, 2025, to decide on the certification request. If they don't act by this deadline, the request is considered waived. The notice, filed by the FERC Secretary, Debbie-Anne A. Reese, was published in the Federal Register with the document number 2025-00085.

    Simple Explanation

    In this notice, the Michigan department has one year to decide if a water company can use water for a project, and if they don’t decide by then, it's like giving an automatic "okay".

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 12035
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States, on behalf of the Department of the Interior and the State of Iowa, is seeking public comments on a proposed settlement with Canadian Pacific Railway (CP). This settlement addresses the damage to natural resources caused by an ethanol spill from a derailed CP train near the Mississippi River in 2015. CP has agreed to pay $282,391 for restoration efforts, and in return, will not face legal action from the trustees for these claims. The public has 30 days from the notice's publication date to submit comments, which can be sent via email or mail.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States and the state of Iowa want to make sure Canadian Pacific Railway helps fix the environment after a big train accident spilled ethanol into a river. Canadian Pacific will pay money to make things better, and this notice is asking people to share their thoughts on this plan.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:90 FR 10043
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reopened the comment period for two proposed rules published on January 17, 2025, and January 21, 2025. These rules involve adding certain PFAS to the Toxics Release Inventory and updating methods for analyzing contaminants under the Clean Water Act. The new deadline for submitting comments is March 24, 2025. Interested parties are encouraged to review these proposed rules and share their feedback with the EPA.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is giving people extra time to share their thoughts on two ideas they have about how to handle certain chemicals and water cleaning methods. Now, everyone has until March 24, 2025, to say what they think!

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 10269
    Reading Time:about 43 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued the 2021 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for stormwater discharges from industrial activities. This permit replaces the expired 2015 MSGP and covers eligible operators in areas where the EPA is the permitting authority, including states, Indian country lands, and U.S. territories. The new permit introduces changes such as streamlined language, public signs for permit coverage, and new monitoring requirements. It will be effective from March 1, 2021, and lasts for five years, aiming to ensure compliance with the Clean Water Act.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has made some new rules about how rainwater from factories can go into rivers without making them dirty. These rules started in March 2021 and help keep the water clean for everyone.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8048
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Justice has filed a proposed update to the 2006 Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. This case involves the United States and the State of Connecticut seeking action against the Metropolitan District of Hartford for violations of the Clean Water Act. The modification extends the deadline for removing certain sewage overflow points and sets a new plan for reducing water infiltration into the sewer system. Public comments on this proposal are open for thirty days, and the decree can be accessed online or by requesting assistance.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge of making sure our water is clean want to change some rules they set a long time ago. They're giving more time to fix places where dirty water could spill and are planning better ways to keep rainwater out of the sewers. People can share their thoughts on these changes, and everyone can read or ask about it.

123 Next