Search Results for keywords:"Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act"

Found 53 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act"

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3618
    Reading Time:about 12 minutes

    The NCUA Board has finalized a rule to adjust the maximum amounts of civil monetary penalties (CMPs) it can impose, based on inflation, as mandated by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act. These adjustments, which must be made annually, are calculated by comparing the consumer price index for previous years. The new rule takes effect immediately upon publication and applies to penalties assessed for violations from November 2, 2015, onward. The adjustments are largely technical and do not require public notice or comment.

    Simple Explanation

    The government has made a rule to change how much money they can ask people or companies to pay as a penalty when they break some rules, making sure the amounts keep up with inflation. These changes are mostly about keeping up with the cost of things, and they don’t need people to give their opinions before they happen.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 6806
    Reading Time:about 13 minutes

    The Department of Education has issued new regulations to adjust penalties for inflation, as required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. These adjustments affect various fines related to educational institutions and government interactions, such as failure to report information or improper lobbying. The changes, effective January 21, 2025, are calculated using a set multiplier for inflation and will impact penalties assessed after this date for violations occurring post-November 2, 2015. The adjustments ensure the penalties continue to serve their deterrent purpose without being subject to a public comment period, as allowed by the law.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Education decided to raise the fines they give when someone breaks certain rules, to make sure these fines still make people follow the rules. They used some special math to figure out how much to raise them, and these new fines will start on January 21, 2025.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1902
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has updated its regulations to adjust for inflation the civil monetary penalties under its jurisdiction. This action is aligned with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act and is mandatory for ensuring penalties keep their deterrent power. For 2025, the penalties for false certifications related to VA-guaranteed loans have been increased from $27,894 to $28,619, and penalties for false claims to VA have risen from $13,946 to $14,308. The changes take effect on January 10, 2025, and were made without public comments due to the statutory requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Veterans Affairs is making the fines they use to punish people who break the rules a little bit bigger, like how prices of things usually go up over time, to make sure these fines still work well to stop rule-breaking. This was done without asking people what they think because the law says they have to do it every year.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 2611
    Reading Time:about 13 minutes

    The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has issued a final rule that updates the maximum daily civil penalties for violations related to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). These updates adjust for inflation, applying a 2025 multiplier set at 1.02598, which reflects inflation from October 2023 through October 2024. The adjusted penalties now stand at $55,764 for OCSLA and $59,114 for OPA violations. These changes, effective January 13, 2025, ensure BOEM penalties maintain their deterrent effect and comply with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act. The adjustments are automatic and exempt from the usual rulemaking procedures like public commentary.

    Simple Explanation

    The rules for fines if companies break certain environmental laws on ocean drilling have been updated to match inflation, so the penalties stay strong and fair. Now, if someone breaks these rules, they might have to pay a little more money because costs have gone up over time.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 7635
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The U.S. Office of Government Ethics has issued a final rule to adjust the civil monetary penalties related to the Ethics in Government Act, following the guidelines of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. This rule updates the penalty amounts based on inflation, using a specific formula, to maintain their deterrent effect. The penalties for various violations have been increased slightly, such as those related to financial disclosures and breaches of trust, and these changes apply to penalties assessed after January 15, 2021. The adjustments help ensure that monetary penalties keep up with the cost of living over time.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Office of Government Ethics made new rules to make sure people who work in the government pay more money when they break certain rules, like hiding how much money they earn, to keep up with price changes. These changes happened after January 15, 2021, and help make sure the fines are still a good reminder not to break the rules.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3039
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Federal Maritime Commission has issued a final rule to adjust civil monetary penalties for inflation. This adjustment is required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The new penalty amounts are calculated using a formula based on changes in the consumer price index. This rule takes effect on January 15, 2025, and does not require a public comment period due to exemptions from certain rulemaking procedures.

    Simple Explanation

    The Federal Maritime Commission is updating fines to match the rise in prices, like when things cost more at the store, starting January 15, 2025, and they don't need to ask people what they think about this change first.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 8131
    Reading Time:about 8 minutes

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is releasing a final rule to update regulations on the maximum civil monetary penalties for breaking laws under its control. This change is in line with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which requires annual inflation adjustments. The rule outlines how to calculate the new adjusted penalties, which will take effect immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. The Commission asserts that public notice and comment were not needed due to legal obligations dictating both the method and amount of these adjustments.

    Simple Explanation

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is changing the rules to make sure fines for breaking rules under their watch keep up with inflation, which means the fines will be a little bigger every year to match how things get more expensive. They did this because a law told them they have to, and they didn't need to ask people what they thought first.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1
    Reading Time:about 29 minutes

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule to adjust civil monetary penalties for inflation, effective January 2, 2025. These adjustments are in line with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 and guidance from the Office of Management and Budget. This rule increases penalty amounts for violations occurring after November 2, 2015, and applies to various DHS components like the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Coast Guard. The updated penalty amounts are designed to maintain their deterrent effect and comply with mandatory legislative requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is making sure that the fines people have to pay for breaking certain rules keep up with price changes, so they still work as a warning to not break the rules. This means if someone does something wrong, like breaking a law, after a certain date, they might have to pay more money as a penalty.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 2005
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Railroad Retirement Board has announced updates to the fines for civil penalties to adjust for inflation, as mandated by a law from 2015. These adjustments are based on a calculation that compares changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) over the past year. For 2021, this resulted in an approximate 1.01% increase in penalties, which means certain fines under acts like the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act and the False Claims Act have increased slightly. These changes take effect from January 11, 2021.

    Simple Explanation

    The Railroad Retirement Board makes sure that fines keep up with price changes so they stay fair, and this year they made some fines a tiny bit higher. They did this by looking at how money values changed from last year, kind of like when prices at the store go up.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1745
    Reading Time:about 59 minutes

    The Department of Transportation issued a final rule that updates the penalties for violations of certain DOT regulations to account for inflation, as required by legislation from 2015. These updates affect various areas such as air and motor vehicle safety, hazardous materials transportation, and railroad operations. The changes include adjustments in the minimum and maximum fines that can be imposed for different types of violations. The rule was implemented immediately and did not include a notice and comment period, as per the stipulations of the legislation enabling these adjustments.

    Simple Explanation

    The government has updated the money fines for breaking certain travel and vehicle rules to make sure they keep up with how much things cost now. They didn't ask people what they thought about it first because a law said they didn't need to this time.