Search Results for keywords:"Toxic Substances Control Act"

Found 16 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Toxic Substances Control Act"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 4741
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to extend the approval of its information collection practices related to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for chemical risk evaluations and management to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This extension would allow the EPA to conduct surveys and collect information from various entities such as chemical manufacturers and users to help with risk assessments and regulatory actions. The request is open for public comment until February 18, 2025. The information collected is intended to aid in developing regulations and evaluating the risks associated with chemicals under TSCA.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep asking people questions about how chemicals are used and if they're safe, but they need special permission to do so. They are checking if their plan is good enough to keep everyone safe and want people to give feedback about it.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 880
    Reading Time:about 72 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act to address health and environmental risks posed by decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), a persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemical. The rule prohibits the manufacture, processing, and distribution of decaBDE and products containing decaBDE, with some exceptions, aiming to significantly reduce exposure to the chemical. To comply, recordkeeping is required for those involved with decaBDE, except in cases involving recycling, where no new decaBDE is added. The restrictions will help to protect human health and the environment by decreasing the presence and exposure risks associated with decaBDE.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a rule to stop businesses from making and selling a chemical called decaBDE because it's bad for people and the planet, but they made some exceptions for recycling.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 102773
    Reading Time:about 2 hours

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is updating regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to improve the review process for new chemicals. These changes match the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act updates from 2016, aiming to make the process more efficient and clear. Significant adjustments include requiring more detailed information from those submitting new chemical notices, extending requirements for exceptions known as "low volume" and "low release and exposure" to certain chemicals, and ensuring all per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) go through a full review. The modifications seek to enhance EPA's ability to assess and manage chemical risks to health and the environment.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is updating some rules to make sure new chemicals are checked properly for safety. They want to be sure that certain harmful stuff, like PFAS, can't skip the safety check.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 11899
    Reading Time:about 14 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the reporting deadlines for manufacturers of certain chemical substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Originally set for March 13, 2025, the new deadlines are June 11, 2025, for vinyl chloride and September 9, 2025, for 15 other chemicals. This change was made to allow companies more time to comply with the reporting requirements due to unexpected difficulties and to ensure that EPA receives necessary health and safety data to evaluate and manage potential risks these chemicals may pose. The extension does not alter the existing requirements but provides additional time for better compliance and guidance from EPA.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is giving companies more time to send important health and safety information about certain chemicals so they can make sure these chemicals are safe; they set new deadlines to help businesses that were having trouble getting the information together on time.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 894
    Reading Time:about 86 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to regulate the chemical known as Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1) (PIP (3:1)). This rule prohibits the processing and distribution of PIP (3:1) and products containing it, with certain exceptions for specific industries like aviation and automotive, where no safer alternatives exist. The rule also bans the release of this chemical into water and mandates that commercial users follow best practices to prevent such releases. The regulation aims to reduce the manufacture, use, and disposal of PIP (3:1), thereby lowering the risk of exposure to humans and the environment.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA made a rule to make sure a big, complicated chemical called PIP (3:1) isn't used too much because it could be bad for people and nature. This rule stops PIP (3:1) from getting into the water and from being used, except in special cases where it's really needed, like in airplanes or cars.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 314
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to extend their existing information collection mandate under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8(b) for TSCA Inventory Notifications. This extension is under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as the current approval is valid until January 31, 2025. The request seeks public comments by February 3, 2025. The extension aims to continue recording chemicals manufactured or processed in the U.S., and the EPA must label these substances as β€œactive” or β€œinactive” in commerce. The process involves minimal changes, resulting in a reduced time burden for respondents.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep track of which chemicals are being made or used in the U.S. They have asked for more time to do this by filling out forms that sort chemicals into "active" or "inactive." They also want to hear what people think about this by February 3, 2025.