Search Results for keywords:"Pennsylvania Fish

Found 165 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Pennsylvania Fish

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1362
    Reading Time:about 2 hours

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a new rule regarding emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This proposal aims to address standards for mercury and chlorine emissions to ensure they do not pose an unacceptable risk to public health or the environment. The EPA suggests that current practices at the one remaining operating facility sufficiently minimize emissions through monitoring and work procedures, but is also soliciting comments on technological advances and more stringent measures, like prohibiting mercury use altogether. Additionally, changes are proposed for record-keeping, electronic reporting, and ensuring emissions controls are effective during startup and shutdown periods. Public input is requested to ensure standards are protective and realistic.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure a factory that uses mercury to make some stuff is safe for people and the earth, so they're checking up on it and thinking about new rules to make it safer, like keeping a closer eye on it and doing more reporting. They also want to know what everyone thinks about these ideas before they decide.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3706
    Reading Time:about 22 minutes

    The General Services Administration (GSA) has finalized a rule that changes how relocation miscellaneous expenses allowances (MEA) are handled for federal employees. Previously, the lump sum amounts were listed in the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); now, they will be published in FTR Bulletins, making it easier to update the amounts based on the Consumer Price Index. This change aims to provide more flexibility and accurate compensation for employees, but it may lead to a small increase in costs for the federal government. The rule also clarifies which expenses may or may not be reimbursed under MEA and ensures that the rules are easy to follow.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government made a change to how they handle moving money for workers moving to a new place for work. Instead of keeping the money rules in a big rulebook, they'll put them in smaller updates, like how some prices change at the store. This makes it easier to change the rules but might also make things a bit confusing if not updated often enough.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 8113
    Reading Time:about 93 minutes

    The final rule permanently adopts changes to the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP) made by the interim rule published in January 2020. It responds to public comments and adjusts several program aspects, including clarifying definitions, addressing eligibility requirements for agricultural and wetland easements, and enhancing conservation and land management practices. The changes, based on the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, are intended to improve the program's efficiency, allowing for more flexible non-Federal cost-sharing and incorporating additional conservation planning. The rule emphasizes voluntary participation by landowners and seeks to enhance the conservation value of public investments.

    Simple Explanation

    The rule is like setting new rules for a game to help farmers take better care of their land and water, making it easier and more organized for them to join and get help while also listening to others who shared their ideas about these changes.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 106064
    Reading Time:about 9 hours

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is updating the definition of the term "healthy" as it applies to food labeling to align with current nutrition science and dietary guidelines. This new rule outlines what food manufacturers must meet to label their products as "healthy," focusing on food groups and limiting certain nutrients like added sugars, saturated fats, and sodium. The rule aims to help consumers make better choices for maintaining a nutritious diet and to reduce diet-related chronic diseases. It is designed to ensure that foods labeled as "healthy" provide accurate and helpful information, promoting overall health and nutrition equity.

    Simple Explanation

    The FDA has made new rules for when food can be labeled as "healthy," so it matches what doctors and nutrition experts say about eating right. This helps people choose food that's good for them.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 104427
    Reading Time:about 18 minutes

    The National Park Service has issued a new rule allowing bicycles on approximately 20.6 miles of trails in the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, effective January 22, 2025. This decision came after a public feedback process and an environmental assessment that concluded the expansion of trails for bicycles would not harm the area’s natural resources. The amendments designate specific trails for bicycle use and give the Superintendent authority to manage bicycle access if needed. The changes aim to enhance visitor experiences while ensuring the trails are sustainable and environmentally friendly.

    Simple Explanation

    The park service has decided that people can ride their bicycles on about 21 miles of trails at the Chattahoochee River park because they found it won’t hurt nature, and park helpers can check and make rules if needed to keep everything nice.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 104878
    Reading Time:about 19 minutes

    The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has finalized a rule updating its regulations for floating cabins on the Tennessee River System. These rules require that all existing floating cabins comply with safety and environmental standards and submit a permit application by October 1, 2029. The rule also clarifies electrical and wastewater standards, stating that floating cabin owners must follow all federal, state, and local regulations. If a cabin does not meet these standards, TVA may revoke the permit and require its removal from the river system.

    Simple Explanation

    The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has some new rules for the floating houses on the river to make sure they're safe and don't pollute the water. They say everyone with a floating house needs to follow these rules by 2029, or they might have to move their house off the river.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 3079
    Reading Time:about 2 hours

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the regulations for emissions standards from Refractory Products Manufacturing under the Clean Air Act. The proposed revisions include adding new emission standards for certain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and updating standards to address the startup, shutdown, and malfunction of equipment. The proposal also suggests amending electronic reporting requirements to improve the tracking of emissions data. These amendments aim to enhance environmental protection by ensuring that emissions standards are met at all times and by enabling better monitoring and compliance.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure factories making heat-resistant materials are not polluting the air too much. They are planning to add some new rules to reduce harmful smoke and make reports better, so we can all have cleaner air to breathe.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 105555
    Reading Time:about 22 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plans to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for cleanup efforts at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in California, focusing on Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone. This SEIS will explore new alternatives for soil remediation, as prior efforts have faced challenges like unattainable cleanup standards and false positive results in testing. The DOE seeks public comments on these plans during a 60-day scoping period and will hold two public meetings to gather input and discuss the proposed actions and their potential environmental impacts. The SEIS aims to ensure that the cleanup is thorough and complies with environmental regulations to protect public health and safety.

    Simple Explanation

    The government wants to clean up some soil in a special area in California to make it safe for people, and they will ask people for ideas and thoughts on how to do this better by holding meetings and listening to everyone's opinions.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 95117
    Reading Time:about 24 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final decision to partially approve and partially disapprove Utah's plan to address regional haze, which affects air quality in national parks and wilderness areas. The EPA found Utah's plan partially insufficient as it failed to meet certain requirements, such as implementing stronger controls on emissions from specific power plants. Additionally, the EPA disapproved parts of Utah's plan addressing visibility pollution related to ozone levels from a 2020 submission. This ruling emphasizes the need for stronger measures to protect visibility and air quality in protected areas.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is like a referee for clean air, and they looked at Utah’s plan to keep the air clear in parks. They said some parts of Utah’s plan are good, but some parts need to be better, like stopping smoke from big factories so everyone can enjoy nice, clean air.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 95126
    Reading Time:about 27 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has decided to partially approve and partially disapprove parts of North Dakota's regional haze plan (SIP) for its second implementation period. This decision was made because certain aspects of the plan, such as its long-term strategy and goals for reasonable progress, did not meet the necessary requirements under the Clean Air Act. Specifically, North Dakota relied on visibility thresholds that the EPA found unreasonable, which led to rejecting feasible and cost-effective controls on pollution sources like Coyote Station and Antelope Valley. However, other elements of the plan, such as calculations of visibility conditions and monitoring strategies, were approved.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA checked North Dakota's plan for cleaning up the sky and said "yes" to some parts and "no" to others because they didn't think the plan would help the air enough. They liked some of the ways North Dakota wanted to measure the air but thought they could do a better job at making the air clearer.