Search Results for keywords:"financial stability"

The Federal Reserve Board has announced the 2024 global indicator amounts used to determine risk-based capital surcharges for bank holding companies considered globally significant. These surcharges are calculated using a formula that considers various factors like size and interconnectedness. The Board uses data collected by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and converts these figures from euros to U.S. dollars for their calculations. The notice provides a methodology for identifying such banks based on their potential impact on the financial system.

The proposed rule requires banking organizations to notify their primary federal regulator within 36 hours of determining in good faith that a "computer-security incident" has occurred that could cause significant disruptions to operations. A "notification incident" is an incident deemed serious enough to impact banking services or financial stability. Additionally, bank service providers must alert at least two individuals at affected banking organization customers immediately upon experiencing a significant disruption lasting four or more hours. This rule aims to ensure timely and effective responses to potential cybersecurity threats impacting the banking sector.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has proposed a new rule introducing liquidity and funding requirements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, addressing weaknesses revealed during the 2008 financial crisis. These requirements aim to ensure the companies have enough liquid assets to cover short-term and long-term financial needs, reducing the risk that they will require taxpayer bailouts. The rule also includes reporting obligations for the companies, mandating that their liquidity positions and management strategies be shared with FHFA and the public. The proposal invites public comments and suggests adjustments to liquidity requirements during economic stress.

The Postal Regulatory Commission is seeking public input on potential new regulations to improve the effectiveness of the Market Dominant ratemaking system in accordance with the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA). This process aims to address challenges such as increasing efficiency, reducing costs, maintaining high-quality service standards, and assuring financial stability. To gather opinions and discuss potential changes, comments are invited until April 15, 2021, and reply comments until May 17, 2021. The Commission is also exploring how performance-based regulations and financial incentives might guide the Postal Service towards desired improvements.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have finalized a rule called the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). This rule is designed to ensure large banking organizations maintain stable funding over a one-year period to support their various financial activities. By requiring stable funding, the rule aims to reduce liquidity risks, ensuring banks can continue to operate smoothly even in challenging economic conditions. This rule applies to large U.S. banks and some foreign banks with significant assets, enhancing the overall stability of the financial system.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved a rule change by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) that restricts certain companies from using reverse stock splits to continue being listed on the exchange. This new rule targets companies that repeatedly use reverse stock splits, especially if they have done so in the past year or have a significant reverse split history in the last two years. The SEC believes this rule will help protect investors by ensuring that companies listed on the exchange are financially stable and suitable for continuing public trading. Companies can still appeal if they are delisted due to these new rules.

In the Federal Register, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it has no objections to the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation's (FICC) proposal to enhance its system for settling trades in U.S. Treasury securities. The proposal includes expanding FICC's central counterparty services to cover both the start and end of same-day repurchase agreements known as "repos," which aims to reduce settlement fails and improve efficiency. Additionally, FICC introduced a Pair-Off Service to help members settle their failed obligations more efficiently, minimizing market risks by allowing them to resolve these by the end of each day. The changes are expected to support financial stability by reducing systemic risks and promoting effective risk management.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering a proposed rule change by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) to introduce a "Volatility Event Charge." This charge is designed to help FICC manage and reduce its risk during periods of significant market upheaval, like major elections or economic announcements, that could cause large market movements. The proposed change is aimed at ensuring FICC has enough financial resources to protect against potential losses if a clearing member defaults during such volatile times. The SEC invites public comments on this proposal, which would add more stability to financial markets by proactively managing associated risks.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has introduced Rule 17Ad-24, which exempts certain activities of registered security-based swap dealers, execution facilities, and individuals engaged in minimal dealing activity from being classified as a "clearing agency" under the Securities Exchange Act. This exemption aims to prevent unnecessary regulatory overlaps and burdens, ensuring that only activities posing significant risks are subjected to clearing agency requirements. By doing so, the SEC seeks to foster efficiency, competition, and capital formation in the security-based swap market without compromising investor protection and financial stability.

The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) has filed a proposal to increase its clearing fees with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), effective January 1, 2025. This change will increase the per contract clearing fee from $0.02 to $0.025 and eliminate the $55.00 per transaction fee for larger transactions, moving to a single fee structure regardless of transaction size. The OCC aims to address anticipated financial needs due to factors like inflation and lower interest incomes while ensuring equitable and reasonable costs for its services. The fee change aligns with maintaining OCC's financial stability and regulatory compliance.