Search Results for keywords:"Final Rule"

Found 17 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Final Rule"

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3610
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    The U.S. Office of Government Ethics has issued a final rule to adjust the fines for violations of the Ethics in Government Act in 2025, as required by law to keep up with inflation. These changes, effective January 15, 2025, include increasing penalties for activities such as falsifying financial disclosure reports and misuse of public reports. The adjustments ensure that penalties remain a deterrent and are calculated based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. These updates only affect violations occurring after November 2, 2015, that are addressed after the new rule's effective date.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is making the fines people must pay higher if they break a special honesty and ethics rule to keep up with rising costs of living. They want these fines to stay big enough to stop people from doing wrong things, like lying on their reports.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1
    Reading Time:about 29 minutes

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule to adjust civil monetary penalties for inflation, effective January 2, 2025. These adjustments are in line with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 and guidance from the Office of Management and Budget. This rule increases penalty amounts for violations occurring after November 2, 2015, and applies to various DHS components like the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Coast Guard. The updated penalty amounts are designed to maintain their deterrent effect and comply with mandatory legislative requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The government is making sure that the fines people have to pay for breaking certain rules keep up with price changes, so they still work as a warning to not break the rules. This means if someone does something wrong, like breaking a law, after a certain date, they might have to pay more money as a penalty.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 10029
    Reading Time:about 10 minutes

    The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is adjusting the maximum civil monetary penalties (CMPs) according to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. These adjustments ensure that penalties for violations of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (PFCRA) and Restrictions on Lobbying continue to reflect inflation and maintain their deterrent effect. The new penalties are based on the Consumer Price Index and are effective for violations assessed after January 15, 2021. The inflation-adjusted penalties are now set at $11,802 for false claims under the PFCRA and range from $20,720 to $207,314 for lobbying restrictions violations.

    Simple Explanation

    The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) has made changes to the fines for breaking certain rules so that they keep up with how prices change over time, like when things get more expensive in a store. Now, if someone breaks these rules, they might have to pay between $11,802 and $207,314, depending on what they did wrong.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 1374
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation issued a final rule to adjust the maximum civil penalties for certain violations, in line with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015. This adjustment is required annually to account for inflation and affects penalties under specific sections of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). For 2025, the penalty amounts have increased to $2,739 under section 4071 and $365 under section 4302. These adjustments apply to penalties assessed after January 8, 2025.

    Simple Explanation

    The rule means that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is making the fines for certain mistakes about retirement plan information a little bigger to keep up with inflation, like how prices for candy get higher over time.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 100348
    Reading Time:about 82 minutes

    The U.S. Copyright Office has issued a final rule making changes to how cable operators report their royalties, specifically through the Statement of Account form. The changes clarify how different fees, like equipment and broadcast fees, must be reported, remove outdated references, and eliminate certain reporting categories to streamline the process. The rule also requires all payments to be made electronically and introduces measures for closing out statements of account when inquiries are not responded to within a set time frame. These updates aim to improve the clarity and efficiency of royalty reporting for statutory cable, satellite, and digital audio recording licenses.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Copyright Office made new rules that help cable companies figure out how to report fees they collect, like for TV equipment and shows. These rules make the process easier and faster, and now everything must be done online.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 3836
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Department of Defense (DoD) has issued a rule to remove an outdated contract clause from the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). The clause, 252.239-7006, known as "Tariff Information," required telecommunications contractors to submit certain information, which is no longer deemed necessary. This change is expected to save costs for both the DoD and contractors. The removal simplifies compliance for contractors, including small businesses, as it eliminates a reporting requirement that was previously mandated.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Defense has decided to get rid of an old rule that made phone companies fill out extra paperwork. This change will make things easier and save money for everyone involved.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 9253
    Reading Time:about 40 minutes

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) adopted a final rule to codify the Interagency Statement Clarifying the Role of Supervisory Guidance issued in 2018 along with the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This rule emphasizes that supervisory guidance, unlike laws or regulations, does not have legal force and doesn't create legally binding obligations for the public. The rule aims to ensure that the OCC will follow the principles of administrative law and use guidance to support transparency and consistency in the supervision of banks. The final rule takes effect on March 15, 2021, and assures that supervisory guidance will continue to be a valuable tool without being enforceable like laws.

    Simple Explanation

    The OCC made a rule to say that their guide for banks is just advice and not something they have to do like a law. This helps make sure everyone knows the rules are fair and clear.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 3038
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The Corporation for National and Community Service, also known as AmeriCorps, has issued a final rule to update the civil monetary penalties in its regulations in line with inflation, following the guidelines set by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The penalties related to Restrictions on Lobbying have been adjusted from a range of $24,497 to $244,957 to a new range of $25,133 to $251,321. Similarly, the penalty under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act has been raised from a maximum of $13,946 to $14,308. These changes take effect immediately as of January 14, 2025, without prior public notice or comment due to the non-discretionary nature of the updates.

    Simple Explanation

    The government updated some money fines, making them a bit bigger because of inflation, like how prices go up over time. They didn't ask people what they thought about the changes because they had to follow the rules to update them automatically.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 9261
    Reading Time:about 42 minutes

    The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection has adopted a final rule to clarify that supervisory guidance is not legally enforceable like laws or regulations. This rule, grounded in the 2018 Interagency Statement, ensures the Bureau will not take enforcement actions based on such guidance. The guidance serves as a tool to communicate expectations and improve industry understanding, but it does not create binding legal obligations. Some commenters supported the rule for providing clarity, while others expressed concerns about its impact on supervisory discretion.

    Simple Explanation

    The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection made a rule saying that some advice they give, called supervisory guidance, is like friendly advice and can't be used as a must-follow law. This means banks and companies have to follow real laws, but this guidance just helps them understand what the rules mean better.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1809
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has issued a final rule to adjust the civil penalties they can impose for regulatory violations, in compliance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The rule, effective January 11, 2021, adjusts the maximum penalty for certain violations from $1,722 to $1,742, based on the 2021 cost-of-living adjustment multiplier provided by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This adjustment ensures penalties keep pace with inflation. The adjustment is not a significant regulatory action and does not impose new reporting requirements.

    Simple Explanation

    The National Transportation Safety Board has decided to make a small increase in fines for breaking certain rules, from $1,722 to $1,742, to keep up with the cost of living. This change makes sure that fines are fair and reflect current prices.

123 Next