Search Results for keywords:"unreasonable risk"

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final risk evaluation for the chemical C.I. Pigment Violet 29, used in various products like paints and inks. This evaluation checks if the chemical poses any unreasonable risks to health or the environment under certain conditions of use. The EPA found some uses of the chemical do pose unreasonable risks, and they plan to address these through management measures. Information and related documents are available on the EPA's website.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released its final risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This evaluation is used to determine if the chemical poses an unreasonable risk to health or the environment, considering its various uses. The EPA found that some uses of 1,4-dioxane do pose such a risk, necessitating regulatory action to manage these risks, while other uses do not. The evaluation and related documents are available for public access.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released the final risk evaluation for Chrysotile Asbestos under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The evaluation identifies certain uses of this type of asbestos as posing an unreasonable risk to health, prompting the EPA to implement risk management measures. Other uses were found not to pose such risks. Additionally, the EPA is working on Part 2 of the risk evaluation, which will address legacy uses and disposals of all types of asbestos, with a draft scope expected for public comment in mid-2021.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to address health risks associated with the chemical C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29). This rule focuses on minimizing inhalation risks by requiring the use of protective gear and regular cleaning in workplaces that handle PV29 in its dry powder form. The EPA has also proposed to implement recordkeeping and labeling requirements to ensure compliance and communication throughout the supply chain. Public comments are being requested to help refine the proposal and ensure its effectiveness in protecting workers' health.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on a draft risk evaluation for Dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This evaluation aims to determine if DCHP poses an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, focusing only on risk factors and not on costs. The draft suggests that DCHP presents a risk, particularly in occupational settings, while consumer and general population risks are not significantly concerning. Public comments are invited until March 10, 2025, and feedback will be considered before finalizing the evaluation.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a notice about certain statements of findings they made under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Specifically, this involves determinations from the EPA that certain new chemicals or new uses of existing chemicals do not pose significant risks to health or the environment. These findings cover submissions made between September 1 and December 31, 2024. The public can access more detailed information on these decisions and submit comments through the EPA's online docket system.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has completed a final risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for formaldehyde, finding that it poses an unreasonable risk to human health. This risk includes both non-cancer effects from short-term skin and inhalation exposure and cancer risks from long-term inhalation exposure. The EPA is required to initiate risk management actions to address these risks. The decision was made based on comprehensive scientific studies and evaluations.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final risk evaluation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for asbestos focusing on its legacy uses and disposals. This evaluation found that asbestos, including types like chrysotile and Libby asbestos, poses an unreasonable risk to human health, particularly due to inhalation exposure which can cause serious health effects like cancer, including mesothelioma. As a result, the EPA must take action to manage and reduce these risks by enforcing stricter regulations on the use, handling, and disposal of asbestos-containing products. The evaluation process was guided by scientific evidence, public and peer review comments, and statutory requirements.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a final risk evaluation for diisononyl phthalate (DINP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The evaluation found that DINP poses an unreasonable risk to human health, particularly due to non-cancer effects like developmental toxicity and liver effects in female workers of reproductive age and other workers exposed to it. The EPA plans to take risk management actions to address these concerns. This includes looking at conditions where exposure to DINP through products like spray adhesives, sealants, and paints may contribute to these health risks.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a regulation to address the health risks associated with a chemical called C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29), as part of their assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Initially, the comment period for this proposal was scheduled to end on February 28, 2025, but it has now been extended by 60 days, giving the public until April 29, 2025, to submit their feedback. The purpose of this extension is to allow stakeholders more time to review the materials and provide their comments. To participate, the public can submit comments online at regulations.gov and should refer to the ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2021-0277.