Search Results for keywords:"termination of investigation"

Found 3 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"termination of investigation"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11328
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided not to review the initial decision made by the administrative law judge to terminate an investigation following a settlement between Medtronic and Axonics. The investigation, which began in April 2024, focused on alleged patent infringements related to medical programmers and printed circuit boards. After some claims were withdrawn and a settlement was reached, both parties filed a joint motion to end the investigation in February 2025. The Commission agreed with this resolution, noting that the decision complied with all necessary rules and did not oppose public interest.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided not to keep looking into a disagreement between Medtronic and Axonics because they agreed to a truce, like when two kids stop arguing and shake hands. The grown-ups in charge said this was okay and didn't think it would cause any problems.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 101050
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) decided not to review an initial determination to end an investigation concerning specific electronic devices like smartphones and computers. This decision followed a joint motion by InterDigital Inc. and the respondents, Lenovo and Motorola, to terminate the investigation based on an existing arbitration agreement. The USITC concluded that ending the investigation would save resources and agreed with the motion as there were no objections. The investigation is now officially concluded as of December 9, 2024.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided to stop looking into a dispute about smartphones and computers because the companies involved agreed to solve it through a process called arbitration, which is like having a private judge help them work things out. This means the investigation is closed, and no one is upset about this decision.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 1522
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States International Trade Commission announced the termination of an antidumping duty investigation on wood mouldings and millwork products from Brazil. This decision follows a negative final determination by the Department of Commerce, meaning they found no sales at less than fair value from Brazil. The public can access further information and documents related to this investigation through the Commission's electronic docket system. This action is taken under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission's rules.

    Simple Explanation

    The United States has stopped looking into whether Brazil was selling wood products at unfairly low prices because they found it wasn't happening. This means Brazil is not in trouble for selling these wood products cheaply in the U.S.