Search Results for keywords:"section 337 investigation"

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from InOvate Acquisition Company, alleging that certain dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies imported into the U.S. infringe on a U.S. patent. The complaint requests an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and seeks a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. The investigation will look into whether the accused products, identified as "wall exhaust vents," violate specific claims of the patent and whether a supporting U.S. industry exists. The respondents named in the complaint include an entity based in China, Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited, both based in Ireland, alleging that certain foreign-made semiconductor devices and products are infringing on several U.S. patents. The complaint claims that these products, which are imported into, sold in, or sold for importation into the United States, violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission has decided to investigate these claims and will consider evidence and arguments from involved parties about the impact of these allegations on the public interest. If the allegations are proven, the Commission may issue orders to prevent the products from being imported or sold in the U.S.

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from Wilson Electronics LLC on January 21, 2021, claiming that certain cellular signal boosters, repeaters, and related equipment infringe multiple U.S. patents. The complaint suggests that these products are being imported, sold for importation, and sold within the United States in violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission decided to initiate an investigation into these allegations. The investigation will determine whether these imports infringe the mentioned patents and if a U.S. industry is adversely affected, leading to possible exclusion and cease and desist orders against the respondents.