Search Results for keywords:"expedited reviews"

The U.S. International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on vertical metal file cabinets from China would cause harm to U.S. industries. The reviews stemmed from a lack of adequate response from interested parties in China, while domestic responses were deemed sufficient. The Commission has also extended the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the case. Interested parties can submit comments by May 1, 2025, but they must follow specific guidelines, and no new facts can be included in submissions.

The United States International Trade Commission has announced the scheduling of expedited reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel trailer wheels from China might lead to continued or recurring material injury to U.S. industries in the foreseeable future. The reviews were deemed necessary due to an adequate response from the domestic interested party group, whereas the response from the respondent interested party group was deemed inadequate. Interested parties are invited to submit written comments, provided they meet specific requirements, by February 13, 2025, unless the Department of Commerce extends the deadline. The review period may be extended by up to 90 days due to the complexity of these reviews.

The United States International Trade Commission announced that it is conducting expedited reviews to determine if removing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rods from China, India, Taiwan, and Thailand would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry. The Commission has decided to carry out these reviews quickly, as the domestic party response was deemed adequate while the foreign party response was not. Interested parties can submit written comments, but they must adhere to specific guidelines and deadlines. Due to the complexity of these reviews, the Commission may extend the review period by up to 90 days.

The United States International Trade Commission announced the scheduling of expedited reviews concerning antidumping and countervailing duties on quartz surface products from China. These reviews aim to assess if lifting these duties would likely result in continued or new harm to the domestic industry. Stakeholders are invited to submit comments by December 26, 2024, regarding what the Commission's decision should be. The Commission has also decided to extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the reviews.

The United States International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing specific duties on aluminum wire and cable from China might cause significant harm to the U.S. industry in the near future. The Commission found the domestic response to their inquiry was sufficient while the Chinese response was insufficient, leading to a decision for expedited rather than full reviews. Interested parties can submit comments until May 15, 2025, but only if they include no new facts. The Commission may extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the reviews.

The United States International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews. These reviews are to decide if removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel racks from China could result in harm to the U.S. industry. This is part of the procedures outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will also extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the reviews. Interested parties can submit comments, but no new factual information is allowed in these submissions.

The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) decided that getting rid of antidumping duty orders on silicomanganese from India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela would likely cause harm to a U.S. industry. The ITC began these reviews on May 1, 2024, and chose to do expedited reviews in August 2024. They completed these determinations by December 4, 2024, concluding that the antidumping orders should stay in place to protect U.S. industry. This decision is documented in the ITC's publication titled Silicomanganese from India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-929-931 (Fourth Review).

The United States International Trade Commission has announced expedited reviews as required by the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing trade duties on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry in the near future. The reviews stem from a prior determination that responses from domestic parties were sufficient, but responses from respondents weren't. Interested parties can submit written comments with their views on the matter by January 14, 2021, though they must not include new factual information. The reviews have been deemed complex, allowing for a possible extension of the review period by up to 90 days.

The United States International Trade Commission has determined that ending the antidumping duty orders on strontium chromate from Austria and France would likely harm U.S. industry. These findings are based on reviews started in October 2024, with the Commission deciding to conduct expedited reviews by January 2025. The complete findings are detailed in USITC Publication 5605, issued in April 2025.

The United States International Trade Commission announced that it will conduct expedited reviews to decide if revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China could result in material injury. These reviews come under the Tariff Act of 1930, and the Commission established that the domestic group's response was adequate while the respondent group's response was not. The process will include staff reports and written submissions, with a chance for public comment, and the review period might be extended by up to 90 days.