Search Results for keywords:"countervailing duty orders"

The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the countervailing duty orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rods from India and China would likely result in ongoing subsidies and harm to the U.S. industry. Therefore, the Department of Commerce will continue these orders. This decision follows a review process that did not receive adequate responses from China, India, or any respondents, leading to an expedited review. Further details and analysis can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accessible online.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain paper plates imported from China and Vietnam. This decision follows final affirmations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission, which determined that these imports are harming U.S. industries due to government subsidies in those countries. As a result, additional duties are imposed on these imports to offset the subsidies. The orders include specific instructions for how duties should be assessed on paper plates from both countries, with additional retroactive duties on Chinese products due to critical circumstances.

The United States International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews. These reviews are to decide if removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel racks from China could result in harm to the U.S. industry. This is part of the procedures outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission will also extend the review period by up to 90 days due to the complexity of the reviews. Interested parties can submit comments, but no new factual information is allowed in these submissions.

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have decided that removing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on steel racks and parts from China would likely result in unfair pricing and subsidies, harming U.S. industries. As a result, Commerce is continuing these orders, meaning U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting duties on these imports. These orders apply to steel racks and parts thereof, with specific exclusions and detailed scope described within the orders. The decision is effective from March 5, 2025, and compliance with protective measures regarding business information is required.

The United States International Trade Commission has announced expedited reviews as required by the Tariff Act of 1930 to decide if removing trade duties on passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China would likely cause harm to the U.S. industry in the near future. The reviews stem from a prior determination that responses from domestic parties were sufficient, but responses from respondents weren't. Interested parties can submit written comments with their views on the matter by January 14, 2021, though they must not include new factual information. The reviews have been deemed complex, allowing for a possible extension of the review period by up to 90 days.

The United States International Trade Commission announced that it will conduct expedited reviews to decide if revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China could result in material injury. These reviews come under the Tariff Act of 1930, and the Commission established that the domestic group's response was adequate while the respondent group's response was not. The process will include staff reports and written submissions, with a chance for public comment, and the review period might be extended by up to 90 days.

The United States International Trade Commission has started reviews to determine if removing duties on uncoated paper from China, Indonesia, Australia, Brazil, and Portugal might cause harm to U.S. industries. These reviews will consider the potential impact on production, prices, and imports of such paper. Companies and organizations involved in producing, importing, or exporting this paper are invited to submit relevant information by specified deadlines. The outcome will decide whether to maintain or revoke these trade orders.

The Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission have decided to continue the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from China. This decision is based on findings that removing these orders would likely result in the recurrence of dumping, government subsidies, and harm to the U.S. industry. The continuation of these orders means that additional duties will still be collected on these imports to protect U.S. businesses. This continuation is effective from January 4, 2021, and further reviews will be conducted in the future to assess the situation again.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overturned previous decisions from the U.S. Court of International Trade regarding aluminum door thresholds from China. These thresholds, imported by Worldwide Door Components, Inc. and Columbia Aluminum Products, LLC, are now classified as subject to antidumping and countervailing duty orders. This decision means that the Department of Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue holding the thresholds until further instructions are given. Additionally, the cash deposit rates for these items will be determined by the rates applicable to similar products from China.

The United States International Trade Commission is conducting expedited reviews to decide if lifting the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam could cause harm to U.S. industry. These reviews, scheduled under the Tariff Act of 1930, aim to assess potential negative consequences within a foreseeable time frame. The Commission has given specific dates for submitting comments related to these reviews and has outlined procedures for participation and document submission. This process allows interested parties to express their views on whether these trade protections should remain in place.