Search Results for keywords:"cease and desist order"

The U.S. International Trade Commission received a complaint from InOvate Acquisition Company, alleging that certain dryer wall exhaust vent assemblies imported into the U.S. infringe on a U.S. patent. The complaint requests an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and seeks a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. The investigation will look into whether the accused products, identified as "wall exhaust vents," violate specific claims of the patent and whether a supporting U.S. industry exists. The respondents named in the complaint include an entity based in China, Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd.

The U.S. International Trade Commission found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 related to certain liquid transfer devices and issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. The original complaint, filed by West Pharmaceutical Services, claimed infringement of a U.S. patent by products imported into the U.S. from three companies. After a thorough investigation, the Commission confirmed the infringement of the patent and ruled that no bond was necessary because the public interest would not be harmed by the orders. Commissioner Kearns disagreed with the final decision and provided a separate opinion.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, alleging that Samsung Electronics violated trade laws by importing and selling certain cellular communication systems and components in the U.S. The complaint seeks an exclusion order, a cease and desist order, and a bond during a review period. The Commission is asking for public comments on the potential impact of these requested actions on U.S. public health, competitive conditions, and consumer interests. Comments must be submitted electronically and include specific details about how these actions could affect public welfare or market conditions in the U.S.

The U.S. International Trade Commission decided to issue a limited exclusion order (LEO) that stops certain components for injection molding machines from entering the U.S. because they infringe on patents held by Husky Injection Molding Systems. This action was taken against Ningbo AO Sheng Mold Co., Ltd. (doing business as AOSIMI) because the company failed to participate in the investigation, leading to a default judgment. Although the complainants also asked for a cease and desist order (CDO), the Commission chose not to issue one, citing insufficient evidence of AOSIMI having significant business operations in the U.S. However, Chair Karpel disagreed and believed both the LEO and the CDO should be issued. The investigation has been closed, but the order will be reviewed by the President, with a bond requirement set at 100% of the value of imported items during this period.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has started an investigation following a complaint by Klein Tools, Inc. This complaint, filed on February 11, 2025, and supplemented on March 3, 2025, claims that Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation has violated patent rules by importing and selling glow fish tape systems and safety helmet systems that infringe certain patents. Klein Tools is asking the Commission to issue orders to stop these products from being imported and sold in the U.S. If the respondent fails to respond to the allegations, they risk having an exclusion order or a cease and desist order placed against them.

Shoals Technologies Group, LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, claiming that certain companies are importing and selling photovoltaic trunk bus cable assemblies that infringe on its patents. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission has decided to investigate these claims to determine if there is indeed a violation. If the investigation finds in favor of Shoals, it might lead to banning the import of these products and issuing orders to stop their sale.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has begun an investigation following a complaint filed by Synesqo SA, Solvay Specialty Polymers USA LLC, and Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A. The complaint claims that certain companies in China are wrongfully importing and selling polyvinylidene fluoride resins in the United States, infringing on specific patent claims. The plaintiffs are asking for the Commission to issue orders to stop these imports and sales. The investigation aims to determine if these claims are valid and if a relevant U.S. industry is significantly impacted or in development.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint from Maxell, Ltd of Kyoto, Japan, alleging that certain mobile electronic devices infringe on several U.S. patents. This complaint claims that Samsung has imported, sold for import, and sold these devices in the U.S., violating section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The complaint has led the Commission to start an investigation on these allegations. Maxell is requesting that the Commission issue orders to stop the importation and sale of these devices if the investigation finds a violation.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is investigating a complaint filed by Gavrieli Brands LLC. The company alleges that certain women's flats with colored outsoles are being imported into the U.S. and sold in violation of their design patents and trade dress, which could harm the U.S. industry. Multiple entities from New York, the Philippines, and China are named as respondents in this investigation. The Commission will decide if there's a need for exclusion orders or cease and desist orders against these entities.

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has started an investigation based on a complaint from Corning Incorporated regarding certain glass substrates used in liquid crystal displays (LCDs). The complaint alleges that several companies, including those from China and the U.S., are importing products that infringe on Corning's patents. The ITC will look into whether these actions violate U.S. trade laws and if an industry in the U.S. is affected. As a result, Corning is requesting the ITC to issue orders to prevent further importation and sale of the infringing products.