Search Results for keywords:"University of Chicago"

Found 2 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"University of Chicago"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7991
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Department of Commerce has approved the duty-free entry of specific scientific instruments for Rice University and the University of Chicago, as announced in the Federal Register. Rice University plans to use a Signal Acquisition ASCI from LiMicro, China, to research neural connections in animals, as there are no equivalent instruments manufactured in the U.S. The University of Chicago will utilize a White Dwarf Optimal Parametric Amplifier System from Class 5 Photonics, Germany, for various experiments involving nanostructured materials and electronic transitions. No public comments were received regarding these applications.

    Simple Explanation

    The Department of Commerce has said yes to letting Rice University and the University of Chicago bring in very special science tools from other countries without paying extra taxes, so they can study brains and tiny materials better because they can't find the same tools in America.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11040
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The International Trade Administration of the Commerce Department issued a decision regarding the University of Chicago's application to import a scientific instrument, specifically a Fiber Laser Amplifier from China, duty-free. The application, filed under docket number 23-018, was denied because the university did not show that equivalent instruments were unavailable in the United States. The regulation requires denial of applications if they are not resubmitted within a certain timeframe after being denied without prejudice, which was applicable here. The decision was signed by Gregory W. Campbell, Director of Subsidies and Economic Analysis.

    Simple Explanation

    The University of Chicago asked if they could bring a special machine from China without paying extra fees, but got told no because the same kind of machine could be found in the U.S. already.