Search Results for keywords:"U.S. Court of International Trade"

Found 13 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"U.S. Court of International Trade"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9308
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the previous determination by the Department of Commerce regarding unfair pricing of wind towers from Spain was incorrect. Consequently, the Department of Commerce has adjusted the final determination and modified the antidumping duty order, changing the dumping margins for Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) and its affiliates. This decision also affects other producers and exporters as new cash deposit instructions will be sent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The changes were published on February 11, 2025, following a series of legal developments and court decisions.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. court said that the earlier decision about unfair pricing of big wind towers from Spain was wrong, so now the U.S. government changed the rules on how much extra money the companies have to pay when they sell them here.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8884
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a correction to its previous decision regarding the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. On January 28, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the original decision was incorrect, prompting Commerce to amend its results. Despite this change, the revised antidumping duty margin for the company Venus Wire Industries remains above the minimum threshold, meaning they will stay included in the antidumping duty order. Commerce will not issue new cash deposit instructions as Venus had already been subjected to another review that established a new rate.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government changed its mind about some rules for selling a special kind of steel from India to the U.S. because the court said the first decision was not right. But one company's steel still costs extra when sold to the U.S. because of an older rule.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 3118
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has made a decision that is not in line with the Department of Commerce's original findings regarding antidumping duties on welded line pipe from South Korea, specifically for the companies Hyundai Steel, SeAH Steel Corporation, and others. As a result, the Department of Commerce has recalculated and adjusted the dumping margins—the percentage that products are sold below fair market value—accordingly. The CIT's decision includes changes to how certain sales and costs were calculated in response to appeals and takes effect from January 14, 2021. This announcement ensures that future imports from these companies have the adjusted rates, pending any new legal challenges.

    Simple Explanation

    The court told the Commerce Department that they needed to change the numbers they used to figure out if some steel pipes from South Korea were being sold too cheaply in the U.S. Now, the Commerce Department has fixed those numbers like the court said to make sure the pipe companies are playing fair.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9225
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    In a decision on January 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the U.S. Department of Commerce's initial findings in an investigation concerning Brazilian raw honey. The Department of Commerce had originally accused Supermel, a Brazilian honey producer, of providing unverifiable data, and had imposed heavy duties as a result. However, the court found Supermel's discrepancies minor and ordered the review of these duties. Following this ruling, Commerce adjusted the duty rates for Supermel and other producers, relying on verified data rather than their previous adverse determination.

    Simple Explanation

    The court found that a honey company from Brazil wasn't cheating as much as first thought, so the U.S. is lowering the extra fees they wanted to charge for the honey it sells here.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8924
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on January 15, 2025, that Commerce's previous findings regarding antidumping duties on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Korea were incorrect. Following this, the Department of Commerce amended its results, affecting companies like Husteel and Hyundai, as well as others not individually examined. These adjustments, however, will not alter existing cash deposit rates due to subsequent reviews already being completed. The liquidation of entries remains suspended until any ongoing or future appeals are resolved.

    Simple Explanation

    The court decided that a mistake was made earlier about how much extra tax companies from Korea should pay for selling steel pipes in the U.S., so now they are fixing it for some of those companies.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 302
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the Department of Commerce's final decision regarding certain superabsorbent polymers from Korea, covering the period from October 2020 to September 2021. As a result, Commerce is changing the antidumping duty order, specifically altering the dumping margins for LG Chem, Ltd. and other producers and exporters of these polymers. This change follows a review of the commercial significance of various characteristics of the polymers, underlining the court's concerns about the initial findings. Commerce will update cash deposit instructions for these goods as these changes are implemented.

    Simple Explanation

    The people in charge of trade in the U.S. changed their earlier decision about the price cheating of certain special materials from Korea because a court found a mistake. Now, they will collect different amounts of extra money from the companies that sell these materials to make it fair.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 107106
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a final judgment on December 18, 2024, in the case involving Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. and others against the United States regarding antidumping duties on tapered roller bearings from China. The court supported the U.S. Department of Commerce's reevaluation of their previous decision, leading to changes in the dumping margins for certain Chinese companies. As a result, the Department of Commerce has announced an amendment to its final results, affecting the dumping margins and instructing new cash deposit procedures for U.S. Customs. Further action depends on whether the court decision is appealed.

    Simple Explanation

    The court said that a government office got some calculations wrong about extra charges on special bearings coming from China and asked them to change it, which means the numbers on the bill for some companies will be different now.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9614
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a final judgment on January 17, 2025, regarding the countervailing duty (CVD) review of corrosion-resistant steel products from Korea, stating that it disagrees with the U.S. Department of Commerce's prior decision. Consequently, the Department of Commerce is amending its results concerning the subsidy rates for KG Dongbu Steel and related entities. Current cash deposit rates remain unchanged, and any entries from these companies during 2019 are still subject to an injunction until any appeals are resolved. If not appealed, the Department will instruct the assessment of CVDs accordingly.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. government looked at how much extra help some Korean companies were getting to make their strong metal products. The court said the first look wasn’t quite right, so the government is fixing it. But, the rules won’t change yet until everything is double-checked, kind of like making sure everyone’s playing fair in a game.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11942
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    On November 26, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade declared part of a previous decision about the antidumping duties on tires from China was incorrect. This decision affects the duties assigned to Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd. The Department of Commerce must now adjust the final results for Kenda's duties, but their current cash deposit rate will not change. The department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to calculate final duties owed on relevant Kenda tire imports.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Court made a decision that changed how much tax Kenda, a company from China that makes tires, must pay when selling their tires in the U.S. The government needs to calculate how much tax they really owe, but for now, Kenda still pays the same amount as before.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11256
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. Court of International Trade issued a final judgment that impacted the antidumping duty investigation on mattresses from Indonesia and found it not in agreement with an earlier determination by the U.S. Department of Commerce. As a result, the dumping margin for PT. Zinus Global Indonesia was adjusted from 2.22% to 0.00%, leading to the revocation of the antidumping duty order. Consequently, Commerce will no longer collect cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties on these mattresses starting February 28, 2025, and all previously suspended entries will remain on hold until a final court decision is reached.

    Simple Explanation

    Imagine a rule that put an extra cost on mattresses from a certain place because some people thought they were being sold too cheaply. A judge looked at this rule again and decided it wasn't needed anymore, so now those mattresses won't have the extra cost.

123 Next