Search Results for keywords:"Section 337 violation"

The U.S. International Trade Commission is asking for public feedback on a recent decision by an administrative law judge regarding potential violations related to certain oil vaporizing devices and similar products. The Commission is evaluating whether to implement orders that could stop these devices from being sold in the U.S. if a violation is confirmed. They are particularly interested in how these potential orders might affect public health, safety, competition, and consumers in the U.S. Interested parties can submit their opinions by April 7, 2025, considering aspects like the availability of similar products made in the U.S. and the impact on consumers.

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is requesting public comments on a case concerning certain wearable monitoring devices. An administrative law judge has found a potential violation of Section 337 regarding the import and sale of these devices by various companies, including Fitbit and Garmin. The ITC is considering issuing exclusion orders and cease and desist orders, but they want feedback on how these actions might impact public health, competition, and consumers in the U.S. Public comments are due by March 8, 2021, and should address specific issues like the availability and production of alternative products and potential impacts on consumers.

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided not to review a decision by an administrative law judge regarding violations of section 337, involving products containing tirzepatide. These violations included trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and false advertising by certain companies. The ITC is now asking for written submissions from different parties on potential remedies, public interests, and bonding issues. If a remedy is ordered, it might include stopping these products from entering the U.S. or cease and desist orders against the companies involved.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is seeking public comments on potential actions against Amazon involving certain video-capable electronic devices, such as computers and streaming devices, related to a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission is interested in understanding how these actions could affect public health, competitive conditions, and consumers in the U.S. The public and interested government bodies can submit their thoughts by March 5, 2025. All submissions will be reviewed, with considerations given to public interest issues raised by the possible remedial actions.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has decided to partly review an initial decision that found certain companies violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing and selling infringing shaker screens used for drilling fluids. These products infringe specific patents and trademarks, leading M-I L.L.C. to request a general exclusion order and a 100% bond on these items during a U.S. Presidential review period. The Commission invites interested parties to submit their opinions regarding possible remedies, the public interest, and the amount of bonding required. Submissions are due on specific dates in January 2021.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is examining a potential violation regarding the importation of certain capacitive discharge ignition systems by MOTORTECH GmbH and MOTORTECH Americas, LLC. The Commission is asking for public comments on whether excluding these products from the U.S. would impact health, safety, the economy, or consumer access. People and agencies can share their views by February 27, 2025, focusing on how these products are used, potential alternatives, and the impact on consumers. If confidential comments are needed, specific procedures for secure submissions must be followed.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint filed by Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Marlin Semiconductor Limited, alleging violations involving certain semiconductor devices and their components. The complaint mentions violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by various companies, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing and Apple Inc. The Commission is seeking public comments on the potential impact of the requested actions, such as an exclusion order and cease and desist orders, on public health, competitive conditions, and U.S. consumers. Written submissions must be filed electronically within eight days of the notice's publication in the Federal Register.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that NJOY, a company involved in the importation and sale of vaporizer devices, has violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by infringing on several JUUL Labs patents. As a result, the Commission issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting the import of NJOY's infringing products and cease and desist orders against NJOY. No bond will be required for the importation of excluded articles during the period of Presidential review. This decision was made after a thorough investigation, and the Commission's findings were communicated to the President and the U.S. Trade Representative.

The U.S. International Trade Commission is partly reviewing a decision that found several companies, including Delta Electronics and Foxconn, violated U.S. trade laws. This involves certain power converter modules and computing systems. They are investigating if these products infringe on patents owned by Vicor Corporation. The Commission is asking for input on possible punishments like stopping imports, and they are also considering the impact on public interests. The review includes examining the commercial success and connections to the patented products. Written submissions are requested from involved parties to address these issues.

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is reviewing a decision by an administrative law judge related to certain patents for dermatological treatment devices. The judge found violations of Section 337 with some patents, but not all, and the ITC is asking for further written submissions on specific issues such as jurisdiction and the economic impact on domestic industries. The ITC is also considering what kind of restrictions or penalties to apply to the companies involved, and whether these penalties would affect public interest like health and consumer rights. Participants in this case must submit their opinions by specific upcoming dates.