Search Results for keywords:"Glycine"

The U.S. Department of Commerce completed its review and found that Kumar Industries in India received unfair financial assistance from the government, which helped it export glycine to the U.S. at a lower cost. As a result, the Department has decided on a countervailing duty rate, which means Kumar will have to pay extra taxes on their glycine imports to the U.S. to offset this advantage. The review covered the period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, and the results will be published in the Federal Register, being effective from December 2, 2024.

The Department of Commerce has decided to cancel the review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from Thailand for the period from August 5, 2019, to September 30, 2020. This decision follows the withdrawal of the review request by the petitioner, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., within the 90-day timeframe allowed for such actions. With no new requests for a review from other parties, the Commerce Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on entries made during the specified period. Importers are reminded to submit certificates regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties to avoid potential penalties.

The Department of Commerce conducted an administrative review on the import of glycine from China for the period between March 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020. They confirmed that some companies had not shipped glycine to the U.S. during this time, while Avid Organics Private Limited remains part of the China-wide entity subject to antidumping duties. The final assessment ensures that antidumping duties will be applied appropriately, with the China-wide entity facing a rate of 155.89 percent. Additionally, cash deposit requirements and policies for importers and companies involved in the trade of glycine from China have been outlined.